Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003920
Original file (20090003920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	17 September 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003920 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be paid $33,000 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in his enlistment contract.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that when he enlisted he was promised $33,000 for college with the ACF.  He was never made aware that part of the $33,000 included the amount he was to receive for his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB).  He was under the impression that the ACF of $33,000 was a separate entity.

3.  The applicant provides a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program), a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Discussion Thread, and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 June 2003 for a period of 3 years.

2.  The applicant’s records contain a DA Form 3286-66 [date unreadable] which shows in paragraph 1a that he enlisted for a cash bonus.  Paragraph 3 of this form contains the hand-written word "VOID" over the ACF terms.  Paragraph 9 states in part, "I have read and understand the statements above and that these statements are intended to constitute ALL promises and guarantees whatsoever concerning my enlistment.  No other (verbal or otherwise) promise or representation not annexed to my enlistment contract is valid or will be honored."  This form was authenticated by the applicant's signature.

3.  The applicant's records also contain a DA Form 3286-66, dated 22 March 2003, which shows in section 5 that he did not enlist for the ACF or Loan Repayment Program.  The applicant authenticated this form with his signature.

4.  A DD Form 2366 (Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984) shows the applicant enrolled in the MGIB as required for eligibility of the ACF incentive.  This form states, "I UNDERSTAND THAT I MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE ACF.  I WILL COMPLETE A SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR ENLISTMENT IN THE ACF."  This section contains the hand-written note "ACF $33.000" and the applicant's initials.

5.  On 18 June 2006, the applicant was released from active duty.

6.  The applicant provided a copy of a VA Discussion Thread which shows that the applicant coordinated with the GI Bill website regarding his claim that his ACF was being paid incorrectly.  He was informed that military records show that he was only entitled to a "kicker" in the amount of $16.67 per full-time enrollment and was advised to contact the department of the "Navy" concerning any discrepancy.

7.  The Education Incentives Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, confirmed that the ACF is a fixed amount based on the month and year the member entered active duty.

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), Table 9-4 of the version in effect at the time, explained the ACF.  It stated that applicants for enlistment would be advised of the following:  The ACF provided educational assistance in addition to that earned under the MGIB.  The money earned would be deposited in the Soldier's VA account.  Normally, the funds would be disbursed to the participant in 36 equal monthly installments while the person was enrolled in an approved program of education.

9.  The VA booklet, Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents, states the VA will pay education benefits for training in college, technical, or vocational school to eligible veterans.  Benefits are reduced for part-time training.  The VA will pay an additional amount, commonly called a "kicker" or "college fund" if directed by the Department of Defense.  The maximum number of months veterans can receive MGIB benefits is 36 months at the full-time rate or the part-time equivalent.

10.  Section 549, Duncan-Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, Public Law 110-417, authorizes the Secretary of the Army to consider through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, a request for the correction of military records relating to the amount of the ACF benefit to which a member or former member may be entitled under an Army Incentive Program contract.  If the Secretary of the Army determines that the correction of military records is appropriate, the Secretary may pay such amounts as the Secretary considers necessary to ensure fairness and equity with regard to the request.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to additional ACF benefits was carefully considered and it was determined that there is insufficient evidence to support his claim.

2.  Notwithstanding the fact that the MGIB form shows the handwritten entry "ACF $33,000," the applicant's records clearly show in several documents authenticated with his signature that he declined enlistment for ACF benefits and the only incentive he elected was a cash bonus.

3.  Absent evidence which clearly shows the applicant elected to participate in the ACF at the time that he completed his DA Form 3286-66, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003920



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003920



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010130C071029

    Original file (20060010130C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dale E. DeBruler | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DA Form 3286-66 Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program), Paragraph 1a, states that in addition to the Training of Choice and Cash Bonus Options, he was enlisting for the U. S. Army College Fund. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in April 2002, and there is insufficient evidence to show he was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002927C071029

    Original file (20060002927C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. When the applicant entered active duty on 9 June 2000 for a 3-year enlistment, the veteran's rate for basic MGIB benefits was $19,296.00 for a 3-year term of service obligation. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $33,000 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003504C071029

    Original file (20060003504C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DA Form 3286-59 shows he was enlisting for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, the U. S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (Cash Bonus $5,000), and the ACF for $33,000. His DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) states he was enlisting for the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, the Seasonal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003808C070206

    Original file (20050003808C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's DA Form 3286-66, paragraph 1a states he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Station/Unit/Command/Area Enlistment Program, for the ACF. At the time the applicant enlisted, the ACF and the MGIB was a combination of the benefit (MGIB) and the incentive (ACF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018680

    Original file (20090018680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that she be paid $10,424.32 in Army College Fund (ACF) benefits as outlined in her enlistment contract. The applicant provides a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of this application. The VA booklet, Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents, states the VA will pay education benefits for training in college, technical, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015344C071029

    Original file (20050015344C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his initial enlistment contract and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), Table 9-4 of the version in effect at the time, explained the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014185

    Original file (20060014185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member Mr. Gerald J. Purcell Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his enlistment contract be honored as written, and that he receive a full payment of the Army College Fund (ACF) in the amount of $33,000. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $33,000 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014376

    Original file (20050014376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The opinion recommended the applicant's request be denied since he received the ACF amount as listed in his contract. The ACF fixed amount is therefore subtracted from the MGIB benefit to equal the ACF portion of the applicant's MGIB entitlement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010209C070208

    Original file (20040010209C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Form 3286- 59 (Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program) states the applicant is enlisting under program 9A Army Training Enlistment Program and 9C Army Incentive Enlistment Program (ACF $26,500.00) and (Cash Bonus $8,000.00). The applicant's enlistment documents state that he was enlisting, in addition to the U. S. Army Training Enlistment Program, for the "US Army College Fund $26,500." The advisory opinions admit that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002857

    Original file (20060002857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides: his DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program); his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); and college transcripts. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $50,000 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.