Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003838
Original file (20090003838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  01 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003838 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in Vietnam.  

2.  The applicant states that while in Vietnam he served with Company A, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division and he held an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 October 1965 for a period of 3 years.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded MOS 11B (light weapons infantryman).    

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Vietnam from 12 May 1966 through 12 May 1967.  Special Orders Number 128, dated 8 May 1967, shows he was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry. 

4.  His DA Form 20 does not list the CIB in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the CIB.

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 11 October 1968.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 October 1968 does not show entitlement to the CIB.

6.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army again on 24 August 1970 and he was honorably discharged on 23 August 1974.  During this period of service he served in Vietnam from 19 January 1971 to 9 January 1972 in MOS 61B (Landing Craft Operator) with the 1099th Transportation Company, 5th Transportation Company, and with the 355th Transportation Detachment. 

7.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 August 1974 does not show entitlement to the CIB.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally Appendix V of USARV 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's statements regarding award of the CIB were considered.  However, he has not provided sufficient evidence on which to grant his request.




2.  To support award of the CIB, the applicant is required to have been an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit engaged in active ground combat, and he must have actively participated in such ground combat.  

3.  The available evidence shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS while assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry during his tour in Vietnam from 12 May 1966 through 12 May 1967.  However, therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant actively participated in ground combat while serving with this unit.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003838



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003838



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007265

    Original file (20080007265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1967 to 17 July 1968 and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size (Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry); however, he held a vehicle mechanic MOS. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed another period of service in the Republic of Vietnam as an infantryman from 4 June 1970 to 18 September 1970 (when he departed on leave), and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002631

    Original file (20130002631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * two sworn statements from fellow Soldiers * orders * awards * Vietnam Combat Certificate * Print out from the Vietnam Memorial * 26 photographs depicting Soldiers in Vietnam * 189 pages of Daily Journals of the 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, dated between 1 April and 13 May 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015133

    Original file (20100015133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 April 1966. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he participated in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004000

    Original file (20090004000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 20 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004000 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * Headquarters (HQ), 1st Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS Special Orders Number 171, dated 17 July 1965; * HQ, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks (USDB), Fort Leavenworth, KS, Special Orders Number 64, dated 31 March 1967; * HQ, USDB, Fort Leavenworth, KS, Special Orders Number 210, dated 25 October 1967 (continuation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023880

    Original file (20100023880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Air Medal (AM) (6th Award) and with "V" Device. The available evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. Although the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the AM (5th OLC), there is no evidence of record and he has provided none to show he was awarded the AM (6th Award) and with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006149

    Original file (20090006149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant has met the requirements for award of the CIB, these orders are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the CIB, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025334

    Original file (20100025334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence shows the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam. However, there is no available evidence that shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008310

    Original file (20090008310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the CIB on the same date he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017971

    Original file (20090017971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any orders or other evidence showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. However, the evidence shows the applicant was awarded MOS 11B, he served as an infantryman in duty MOS 11B while assigned to an infantry company, and he was cited for heroism in military operations against a hostile force in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.