Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003805
Original file (20090003805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        23 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003805 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) reflects his service in Vietnam but the awards for this service are not reflected.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  He also states that he enclosed a statement from his commander.  However, no other additional documents were provided with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records, though somewhat incomplete, show the applicant was born on 15 January 1940 and he was inducted in Montgomery, Alabama on 18 October 1963.

3.  He completed his basic training, advanced individual training as an indirect fire crewman, and parachute training and was transferred to Okinawa for assignment to Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment. 

4.  In May 1965, the applicant deployed with his unit to Vietnam as part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, the first major U.S. Army ground unit to be deployed to Vietnam.

5.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 24 April 1965 and on 11 October 1965 he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at Oakland Army Base, California as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 11 months,  and 2 days of total active service and he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Parachutist Badge and his marksmanship badges.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he had served 1 year, 
6 months, and 13 days of foreign service in the U.S. Army, Pacific Command (USARPAC).

6.  A review of the available records failed to show the applicant was awarded the CIB or that he actively engaged the enemy in combat while assigned to an infantry unit.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  Paragraph 2-13d specifically provides that individuals qualified for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 (inclusive) shall remain qualified for that medal.  Upon request, a unit personnel officer may award the Vietnam Service Medal in lieu of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, but the regulation requires that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal be removed from the records of the individual.  No person will be entitled to both awards for Vietnam Service.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal.  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.  Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he meets the criteria for award of the CIB is not in doubt, there simply is no evidence in the available records to support his claim.  Therefore, in the absence of sufficient evidence to show that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned as an infantryman in an infantry unit, there is no basis to award him the CIB at this time.

2.  The applicant's claim that he is eligible for award of the VSM has also been noted and appears to have some merit.  However, the applicant was awarded the AFEM for his service in Vietnam because the VSM had not been authorized at the time he arrived in Vietnam.  While the applicant is authorized to be awarded the VSM, he must first request that the award of the AFEM be removed from his records and replaced with the VSM.  Therefore, until the applicant makes a specific request to replace the award of the AFEM with the VSM, no effective relief can be granted on that portion of his request.

3.  The applicant's contention that he should be awarded the RVNCM has been noted and appears to lack merit.  In order to be awarded the RVNCM, individual had to serve in Vietnam for 6 months, unless evacuated prior to completing
6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action.  The available records show the applicant served in Vietnam from May to October 1965.  Accordingly, it does not appear that he is entitled to award of the RVNCM.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003805



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003805



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | R20050000806C070206

    Original file (R20050000806C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides, in pertinent part, that the VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. While the evidence provided by the applicant indicates that he was authorized to wear the AFEM for his service in Vietnam, his DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the VSM at the time of his REFRAD. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212

    Original file (2003090343C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005533

    Original file (20090005533.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal [for service in Vietnam], Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster and "V" Device, and any other awards which may have been omitted. The regulation stipulates that individuals who qualified for the AFEM for service in the RVN between 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 remained qualified for that medal; however, upon request could be awarded the VSM instead of the AFEM. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022956

    Original file (20120022956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is his preference to have the VSM with proper bronze service stars as opposed to the AFEM * he also desires the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * upon arrival and when he left Vietnam, they were in a full-scale war, nothing expeditionary about it * he is also entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation along with the Army Good Conduct Medal and maybe a host of other unit citations * he held military occupational...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002196

    Original file (20080002196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date of his separation confirms he was REFRAD under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of “Expiration Term of Service (ETS)” and that he was assigned SPN 201. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy. Absent any evidence showing the applicant was recommended or awarded the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty, or that confirms his assignment to and personal participation with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003483C070206

    Original file (20050003483C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). The applicable regulation requires, in the applicant’s case, that he serve 6 months in Vietnam in order to be entitled to award of the RVNCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 9 January 1964 to 3 January 1966, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004440

    Original file (20090004440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Army of Occupation Medal with Berlin Clasp (AOM-Berlin), and Dominican Republic Citation be added to his 1967 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His DA Form 24 (Service Record) for this period of active duty service shows, in Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service), that he served in Seckenheim, Germany, APO 403, from 14 November 1960 through 16 March 1963. Item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010052

    Original file (20110010052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). He had served 2 years of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), and the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008495

    Original file (20070008495.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Good Conduct Medal (GCM), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with Bronze Service Stars, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar (81mm), the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Campaign Medal, and any awards his unit was authorized, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062854C070421

    Original file (2001062854C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military record shows that he entered active duty on 1 July 1964. Evidence shows the applicant had an excellent record of service, accordingly, the Board believes that he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 May 1965 thru 21 May 1966. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Purple...