Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003505
Original file (20090003505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 July 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003505


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests she be granted benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states nothing was explained to her when her husband, a former service member (FSM), retired in 1978.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  the FSM’s death certificate;

	b.  a copy of her marriage license;

	c.  a copy of her Uniformed Services Identification Card (front and back); and

	d.  a copy of a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is the widow of a deceased FSM who retired on 30 January 1978 with more than 22 years of active Federal service.  The applicant and the FSM were married on 12 August 1972.



2.  When the FSM retired, he completed a DA Form 4240.  Part IV (Survivor Benefit Plan Election) shows the FSM stated he was married with dependent children and that he elected to decline SBP coverage (Part IV, Item 15e).

3.  Part IX (Survivor Benefit Plan Certificates) of the DA Form 4240 states the following:

I, the spouse of [FSM], have been fully informed and counseled concerning the options available under the Survivor Benefit Plan for a survivor annuity.  I understand the decision which has been made and is reflected on the reverse of this certificate.

4.  The statement is signed by the applicant, dated 23 January 1978, and witnessed by a Department of the Army Civilian military personnel clerk.

5.  The FSM died on 20 March 2008.

6.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  

7.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provided less than maximum spouse coverage.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant seeks an SBP annuity as a result of the FSM’s death on 
20 March 2008.  She contends the SBP was never explained to her at the time of the FSM’s retirement.

2.  The applicant signed Part IX of DA Form 4240 stating she was “fully informed and counseled” concerning the SBP and the FSM’s declination of same.  Her signature was witnessed and dated on 23 January 1978.

3.  The available evidence shows the applicant knew that the FSM declined SBP coverage and what that declination meant.  SBP premiums were never deducted from the FSM’s military retirement annuity during his lifetime in retirement. 

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003505



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003505



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011584

    Original file (20060011584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military service records contain a copy of a completed DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 17 April 1978. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant contends, in effect, that the records of the FSM should be corrected to show he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005890

    Original file (20080005890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The FSM, upon reaching age 60 and making application for non-regular retired pay, completed DA Form 4240 indicating that he desired full SBP coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the FSM properly completed and timely filed DA Form 4240 electing to provide for spouse only, full SBP coverage at the time he applied for non-regular retired pay; and b. paying to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002897C070206

    Original file (20050002897C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that Section 24 of the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) contains a signature which has been forged. She requests that this signature be removed and replaced with a statement indicating that she did not agree with the decision of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to decline SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022434

    Original file (20120022434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a Certificate of Death showing the FSM died on 20 December 2009 and was married to her at the time. A DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay, letter dated 31 January 2013 addressed to the FSM's former spouse, stated that with regard to her recent correspondence to DFAS regarding the retired pay account of the FSM and SBP coverage, the following was provided: (1) Former spouse SBP coverage is not automatically granted based on being awarded in a divorce decree; a formal request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017526C070206

    Original file (20050017526C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. The applicant also states, in effect, that the retirement services officer allowed her husband to decline the SBP for a survivor annuity, despite the fact that the applicant was required to be counseled and sign Item 24 of the DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel)....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028587

    Original file (20100028587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM’s military service record shows he reenlisted in the U.S. Army on 23 August 1978. Evidence of record shows the FSM elected to decline enrollment in the SBP program upon retirement and a letter of notification was sent to her since she was unavailable for counseling. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005976

    Original file (20080005976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant divorced on 8 August 1988. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. Evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP for spouse and children coverage in 1984.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000502

    Original file (20080000502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states the following new evidence, unavailable and not in the possession of the applicant at the time of application, is submitted to the Board and proves undeniably that the applicant is the surviving spouse of the FSM; that she was married to the FSM at the time of his death; that no divorce between the FSM and applicant had ever been granted; and that the United States Government recognizes that the applicant is the FSM's widow and was entitled to all appropriate benefits. At the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024109

    Original file (20110024109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 June 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024109 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of her previous application for correction of the military record of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage and to be paid the SBP annuity. The evidence of record shows the applicant signed a DA Form 4240 in December 1991 acknowledging she had been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005952C070205

    Original file (20060005952C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 November 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005952 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The DA Form 4240 indicates that the applicant was notified by letter on 15 October 1975 of the FSM’s declination of the SBP; however, a copy of the letter is not available. As a result, the Board recommends that: a....