IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 June 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003463
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
2. The applicant states that he regrets the incident ever happened and praises the young lady that he hurt.
3. The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of this case.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 July 1987. He successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B (Cannon Crewman).
3. On 17 May 1988, the applicant was convicted, contrary to his plea, by a general court-martial, of one specification of rape. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 24 months, confinement for 30 months, and a Bad Conduct Discharge.
4. On 19 October 1988, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review (USACMR) affirmed the findings and the sentence.
5. On 5 January 1989, the U.S. Court of Military Appeals (USCMA) denied the applicant's petition for a grant of review.
6. United States Disciplinary Barracks, U.S. Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth (KS) General Court-Martial Order Number 31, dated 8 February 1989, directed that the applicants Bad Conduct Discharge be executed.
7. On 17 March 1989, the applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge under the provisions of chapter 3 of Army Regulation
635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of court-martial. He completed
10 months and 10 days of creditable active service with 305 days of time lost (confinement).
8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
10. In accordance with The Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209) and Title 10 of the U. S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board
acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction by a court-martial
convened under the UCMJ. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant's trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense for which he was charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
2. By law, the ABCMR may not disturb the finality of a court-martial. The Board is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
3. The applicant's entire record of service was considered in this case. However, given the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted, it is determined that his service was not sufficiently meritorious or mitigating to warrant the relief requested.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ____X__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090003463
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090003463
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004758
The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge. The sentence was approved and, except for the part of the sentence pertaining to a bad conduct discharge, ordered to be executed. U.S. Army Correctional Brigade, General Court-Martial Order Number 757, dated 4 December 1990, shows the applicant's sentence to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 14 months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances, adjudged on 29 September 1989, as promulgated in General Court-Martial Order...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021480
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021480 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-10, provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a General or Special Court-Martial. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018608
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000608
Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, KY, Special Court-Martial Order Number 91, dated 19 June 1990, shows the applicant's sentence having been affirmed and complied with, the convening authority ordered his bad conduct discharge executed. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Separations), chapter 3, with a bad conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008301
Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a General Court-Martial and the findings and sentence were affirmed by the U.S. Army Court of Military Review. After a thorough review of the applicants record and issues the Board found no basis for granting clemency in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015109
His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) with a bad conduct discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable or general discharge is not warranted in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002702
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000346
The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, reconsideration of his previous request for correction of the characterization of service shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from "bad conduct discharge" to "honorable discharge." Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001119
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Conviction and discharge were affected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. The applicant's entire military record was taken...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002715
The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.