Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003404
Original file (20090003404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003404 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his service number on his Honorable Discharge Certificate be changed from ER 51--- --- to US 51--- ---.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was drafted and a draftee's service number started with a US prefix.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) and an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the documents that the applicant provided were sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 lists his service number as US 51--- ---.  It also shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 February 1951 and he served in an active duty status until he was honorably released
19 November 1952 and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Artillery Branch.  This service equals 1 year, 9 months, and 7 days.  This DD Form 214 shows no prior military association.

4.  The applicant’s Honorable Discharge Certificate shows the applicant’s Service Number as ER 51--- ---, that he was inducted on 13 February 1951 until he was transferred to the USAR on 20 November 1952.  He was Honorably Discharged from the Army of the United States on 11 October 1956.  

5.  While the 1950's regulation setting forth the guidelines for service number prefix designations is not available, historically, during the period the applicant served, it was the practice to assign a Regular Army enlisted Soldier the prefix of RA, a draftee the prefix of US, and a USAR enlisted Soldier a prefix of ER.  These prefixes would then be followed by an eight-digit number.  The prefix would change if a Soldier changed components, but the number would not.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was drafted and a draftee's service number started with a US prefix.

2.  The available evidence supports that the applicant entered active duty as a draftee and at the time of the issuance of the 1952 DD Form 214 his designated prefix was US.  However, when he was transferred to the USAR the designation appears to have been properly changed to a prefix of ER.

3.  At the time of the issuance of the 1956 Honorable Discharge Certificate, the applicant is shown to have been an enlisted USAR member.  Therefore, the ER 51--- --- service number on the discharge certificate was and is correct.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003404



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003404



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002791

    Original file (20110002791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100008832, on 12 August 2010. There is no evidence in the available records showing he held a rank higher that PFC while on active duty or that he completed any additional training. There is no evidence in the available records, and he provided none, that confirms he completed any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009737

    Original file (20060009737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009737 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his 24 March 1954 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation) be corrected to show he served in the Regular Army (RA) and had one year of foreign service in Korea. The applicant states his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019824

    Original file (20140019824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 incorrectly shows his service number as "RAXX-XXX-7XX" and his ID card correctly shows his service number as "ERXX-XXX-4XX." The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service number as "ERXX-XXX-4XX" instead of "RAXX-XXX-7XX" was carefully considered. Given the lack of records or other verifiable evidence in this case, there is no way to determine if the numeric portion of his service number is correctly listed on either his DD Form 214 or his ID card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001722

    Original file (20130001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a SGT at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve; however, his discharge certificate shows he was a CPL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * a certificate of promotion, dated 6 June 1955 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 March 1956 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015282

    Original file (20110015282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 22 June 1951; and b. by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 July 1952 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006409C071029

    Original file (20060006409C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also states, in effect, in connection with the date he was wounded in action, that paragraph 6 of the Consideration of Evidence, of the Record of Proceedings, should show he was wounded on 8 September 1951 and not 24 September 1951. The applicant states, in effect, paragraph 7, of the Consideration of Evidence, of the Record of Proceedings, is incorrect about the date Captain D___ joined the unit as its new commanding officer. Paragraph 4, of the Record of Proceedings, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005526

    Original file (20140005526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's complete service personnel records are not available for review; however, his DD Form 214 shows he served on active duty from 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011298

    Original file (20120011298.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Honorable Discharge Certificate to show his service number as "ER xx-xx9-xxx" instead of "ER xx-xx0-xxxx." The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016576 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011298 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011637C070208

    Original file (20040011637C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the United Nations Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and one Overseas Service Bar as authorized awards. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. The applicant served during an authorized period for award of the National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017218

    Original file (20100017218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states he served in the Army in Korea from 1951 to 1952 and he is not getting credit for this time. From 1951 to 1962, item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of the DD Form 214 showed the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214.