Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003383
Original file (20090003383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      23 JUNE 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003383 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show that she declined the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) to include designation of an "insurable interest" beneficiary.  The applicant also requests, in effect, a refund of her SBP payments.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that in March 2003, when she completed the DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), the words "insurable" and "beneficiary" in item 28 prompted her to enter her son's name.  She contends that there were no guidelines on the DD Form 2656 to help her make an informed decision on how to complete the form.  She states she had no way of knowing that 7 percent of her retired pay would be deducted for making an "insurable interest" election.  She completed the DD Form 2656 based on her own resources and in the midst of a most hectic phase of her career.  

3.  The applicant further states that the last 10 years have entailed 60-hour work weeks and three career tracks, to include military family counseling and serving as a national resource for the National Guard Bureau Family Support Program, nursing professor, and wellness educator.  Her work hours did not coincide with the Reserve Personnel Center hours of availability for consultation and/or questions on completing the DD Form 2656.  It was early in 2008 that the applicant seriously started to consider retirement in her civilian career and closely examined her retirement resources.  In April 2008, the applicant called the retirement services representative to inquire about a discrepancy between her retiree point value and the monthly pay scale.  It was at that time she was advised that her retired pay was being reduced by approximately $800.00 per month as a result of her insurable interest election.  The applicant contends that this was the first time she knew of the deduction.  Since then she has spoken to several persons and wrote a letter in September 2008 requesting cancellation of her insurable interest election.

4.  The applicant provides copies of her NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); DD Forms 2656, dated 7 March 2003 and 7 May 2008; ARPC Form 385-4 (Reserve Component Supplemental Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 7 November 1999; Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) Form 75-E (Acknowledgment of Receipt of Letter of Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60); DFASCL-1900/10 (Reserve Special Separation Pay Earnings Statement), dated 30 November 2001; DD Form      108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits), dated 8 July 2005; and a letter from her to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 24 September 2008, requesting cancellation of the insurable interest beneficiary in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 26 March 1945.  At the time of her application, she was a retired member of the United States Army Reserve in the rank of colonel, pay grade O-6.

2.  On 7 November 1999, the applicant signed an ARPC Form 385-4 electing to decline coverage under the supplemental RCSBP.

3.  On 30 November 1999, the applicant was involuntarily separated from the WIARNG due to unit inactivation/reorganization.  She was immediately transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Retired Reserve).  The applicant had completed a total of 26 years, 11 months, and 18 days of credit service for pay.

4.  On 15 December 1999, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) electing option A to defer her SBP election until she reached 60 years of age.

5.  On 7 March 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 indicating that she had no spouse or dependent children.  She elected coverage for her son indicating that he had an insurable interest in her.  The form was signed by the applicant and witnessed.

6.  On 26 March 2005, the applicant reached 60 years of age and became eligible to receive retired pay.
7.  On 7 May 2008, the applicant completed another DD Form 2656 wherein she deleted the insurable interest beneficiary.

8.  On 24 September 2008, the applicant wrote a letter to DFAS requesting cancellation of the insurable interest beneficiary.

9.  On 8 June 2009, the applicant stated in a telephonic conversation with a member of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records staff that the insurable interest beneficiary was cancelled effective October 2008.

10.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

11.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  

12.  An insurable interest beneficiary, under the SBP/RCSBP, is defined as a person who has a financial benefit or advantage from the continued life of the member.  Insurable interest beneficiaries may be designated when a member is unmarried and has no eligible child.  The unmarried member with a sole dependent child may also elect this option for that child regardless of the child's age or dependency status.  Insurable interest persons include, but are not limited to, relatives no more distant than a cousin and business associates when approved by the Service Secretary.

13.  Public Law 103-337, enacted 5 October 1994, provided for the withdrawal of insurable interest beneficiaries at any time.  It does not provide for refund of paid premiums.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that she was not counseled regarding her election of an insurable interest beneficiary.  Furthermore, the last 10 years have entailed 60-hour work weeks that did not coincide with the Reserve Personnel Center hours of availability for consultation and/or questions.  The applicant desires a refund of paid premiums.
2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant elected an insurable interest beneficiary in 2003 and that she requested cancellation of this election in 2008.

3.  The applicant has not provided any documentary evidence showing that she was improperly counseled or misled regarding the completion of DD Form 2656.

4.  There are no provisions in law or regulation providing for the refund of paid premiums for SBP benefits as a result of voluntary termination of election.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  _____X___  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________XXX______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003383



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003383



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060014769C071029

    Original file (AR20060014769C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the available evidence indicates that at some point, while she was a member of the UTARNG, she completed a DD Form 1883, electing to participate in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) and she named a natural person with insurable interest as her beneficiary. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, October 5, 1994; Changed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020277

    Original file (20090020277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 June 2006, he completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) electing to participate in the RCSBP with coverage for his sister as a person with insurable interest, option C, full retired pay. The evidence of record shows in June 2006, the applicant elected RCSBP coverage for his sister, a person with insurable interest. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he requested termination of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017903

    Original file (20090017903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show that within one year of her marriage she elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with spouse only coverage at the full base rate. DFAS records show that: a. the applicant's letter and marriage certificate were received on 29 April 2008, b. DFAS sent her a DD Form 2656 on 19 June 2008, c. on 24 June 2009, DFAS received the applicant's DD Form 2656 but did not process it because it was received more than a year after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006835

    Original file (20090006835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, dated 17 March 1995, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, October 5, 1994, Changed Provisions of the Uniformed Services Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), provided that SBP premiums will no longer apply as of the effective date of termination of NIP coverage except if the participant terminating insurable interest coverage is a participant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002077

    Original file (20110002077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, her military records be corrected to show she terminated her Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage for a natural interest person (NIP) on 7 August 1997. A letter, dated 12 December 2008, from DFAS states: a. on 15 August 1985, she elected NIP coverage under the RCSBP for her daughter. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062788C070421

    Original file (2001062788C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 March 1987, the FSM was counseled concerning the RCSBP and on that date completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) indicate that the DD Form 1883 was not on file and presumably was not forwarded to DFAS by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command when the FSM applied for retired pay. The DD Form 2656 provides an option not to participate; it does not provide an option to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016884

    Original file (20140016884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60. Based on the available records it cannot be determined what, if any, counseling the applicant received at the time of her initial SBP election in 1996 or at the time of her second submission in 2014. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant requested and was granted a suspension of coverage for her mother as an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009607

    Original file (20080009607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she elected to not participate in the Reserve Components Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant provides, in support of her application, an original DA Form 2656-2 SBP Termination Request [signed by both parties and witnessed]; copies of an SBP Fact Sheet bearing handwritten remarks and strikeouts; a four-page printout of SBP information from a Defense Finance and Accounting Service website, dated 25 May; her retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012836

    Original file (20090012836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, he requests that his military records be corrected to show he elected RCSBP former spouse coverage. The applicant's military records show that he was honorably separated from the New Mexico ARNG on 31 January 2008 and he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. If he is requesting only that his RCSBP coverage be changed from insurable interest to former spouse, based on the evidence of record he has already been refunded the difference in premiums between insurable interest...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017267

    Original file (20130017267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she and her spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Once she made the RCSBP election the premiums would have to be recovered from her retired pay...