Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003370
Original file (20090003370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      6 JULY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003370 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was only 17 years old at the time of entry.  He argues that if the conditions were different and he was more mature he would have stayed in the service.  He adds that he regrets his actions and can only ask for forgiveness.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 23 February 1960.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 March 1977 (with parental consent) and upon completion of initial entry training was awarded military occupational specialty 17C (Field Artillery Target Acquisition Specialist).

3.  On 7 February 1978, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being disorderly by setting off an unauthorized lit fire cracker which caused a disturbance in a classroom, for disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer, for being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer, and for participating in a breach of peace by wrongfully engaging in a fistfight.

4.  On 27 March 1978, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, (UCMJ), for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on 20 March 1978.

5.  The applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) on 31 March 1978 and on 28 April 1978; he was dropped from the unit rolls.

6.  On 17 August 1981, the applicant was discharged in absentia under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) chapter 14 for misconduct-desertion.  His service was characterized as under other than honorable conditions.  He completed 1 year and 23 days of active service with 1227 days of lost time.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.


9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to have his discharge upgraded has been carefully reviewed and found to be without merit.

2.  Age is not a sufficiently mitigating factor.  The applicant completed basic combat and advanced individual training and there is no evidence that indicates the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who completed their term of military service.

3.  The applicant's record of indiscipline includes punishments under the UCMJ and 1227 days of lost time due to AWOL and desertion.  Based on this record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  This misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, he is not entitled to either a general or an honorable discharge.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __XXX_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003370



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003370



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007225

    Original file (20100007225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the above, the applicant's commander initiated separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 14, for conviction by civil authorities. The Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge on 29 May 1980. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014706

    Original file (20080014706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time, an under other than honorable conditions discharge was normally considered appropriate. However, there is no evidence that indicates that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012054

    Original file (20120012054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 October 1978, the applicant was notified of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for acts or patterns of misconduct. On 6 November 1978, the separation authority approved his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, and directed he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013291

    Original file (20090013291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 15 August 1978, the applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. He was 20 years and 7 months old at the time of his discharge and there is no evidence that indicates he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who completed their terms of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018335

    Original file (20070018335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows that the applicant was almost 19 years of age at the time of his discharge. The applicant's military service records show that he was separated on 9 January 1980, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-33b for frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authority with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. _ ___X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014314

    Original file (20140014314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 1980, consistent with the chain of command recommendations, the separation authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, and directed he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge with reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 8 December 1980...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003567

    Original file (20090003567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003567 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) that shows the applicant was discharged on 17 July 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14-33b, by reason of misconduct – pattern of misconduct, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019246

    Original file (20140019246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 December 1973, the separation authority approved the discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, and ordered the applicant discharged with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant was discharged accordingly on 18 December 1973. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulations at the time and the character of his service is commensurate with his overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005022

    Original file (20130005022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110018487, on 19 April 2012. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Additionally, as cited in paragraph 8 of this document, a Soldier may be separated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002666

    Original file (20140002666.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 4 December 1979, he was notified by his unit commander that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, with a under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.