Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002661
Original file (20090002661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	25 June 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002661 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device be upgraded to the Silver Star.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was recommended for the Silver Star but it was denied because he was a medic and it was part of his job.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 December 1968 and successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training.  Upon completion of training he was awarded military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).  He served in Vietnam from 28 May 1969 through 27 May 1970 and was honorably released from active duty on 1 December 1970.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Medical Badge, two overseas service bars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) as authorized awards.

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for award of the Silver Star.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy.  The required gallantry (spirited and conspicuous acts of heroism and courage) must have been performed with marked distinction.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130, provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was recommended for the Silver Star but it was denied.  He also contends that the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device he was awarded should be upgraded to the Silver Star.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant's records which shows he was recommended for the Silver Star.
2.  In accordance with the applicable regulation, the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy.  The required gallantry must have been performed with marked distinction.  While the applicant's courage and valor were unquestionable, it does not appear that his actions merit an upgrade of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device to the Silver Star.

3.  While the available evidence is insufficient for upgrading the applicant's Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device to the Silver Star, this in no way affects the applicant's right to pursue his claim for the award by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002661



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002661



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003329

    Original file (20090003329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain General Orders awarding him the Silver Star. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Silver Star. Nevertheless, while the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Silver Star, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Silver Star by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011686

    Original file (20080011686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, an authorized agent working on behalf of the former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM's Air Medal with "V" Device be upgraded to the Silver Star. The applicant provides, through the office of a Member of Congress, an undated facsimile (fax) transmission sheet which was used to forward the application to this agency; a letter from the Member of Congress addressed to this agency, dated 21 July 2008, providing details regarding the FSM's brave service to this country;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008573

    Original file (20080008573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Army Commendation Medal for Valor (ARCOM with “V” Device) be upgraded to a Silver Star. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. There is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for the Silver Star or the BSM for Valor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016314

    Original file (20080016314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain general orders awarding him the Medal of Honor, the Silver Star, or the Bronze Star Medal. In the applicant's case, it is noted that: a. the applicant's record is void of a recommendation for award of the Medal of Honor; there are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Medal of Honor; and the applicant did not provide any incontestable proof of the performance of the service that shows he distinguished himself conspicuously by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004366

    Original file (20140004366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). General orders awarded the unit to which he was assigned while in Vietnam the MUC and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214 the ARCOM *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001996

    Original file (20090001996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fact that the applicant provided two newspaper articles in which one stated that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device while the other article added that he was pained by shrapnel wounds in both legs and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Purple Heart and a Silver Star are not sufficient evidence on which to add award of the Purple Heart and/or the Silver Star to his DD Form 214. The newspaper articles, in the absence of supporting medical evidence, are not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025135

    Original file (20110025135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show all of the awards he may be entitled to receive including the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, Army Commendation Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, and Silver Star. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007936

    Original file (20120007936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. While the available evidence is insufficient for correcting the applicant's records to show award of the Silver Star or the "V" device for his Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the awards by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014952

    Original file (20080014952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. Letter, dated 22 May 2008, from the applicant's former platoon leader to the applicant's counsel. In June 2008, the applicant solicited the help of his counsel to assist him in upgrading his Bronze Star Medal. After returning the fire, [PFC Hxxxxxt] moved toward the enemy position and eliminated it with fire from his rifle.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009512

    Original file (20090009512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. With respect to the Silver Star or the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the decision of whether to award an individual a decoration and which decoration to award is a judgment call made by the commander having award approval authority. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds...