Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002486
Original file (20090002486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002486 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states she had 3 consecutive years of honorable service but was never awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence or official documentation in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant's military personnel records show she enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 February 2001 for a period of 3 years.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92F (Petroleum Supply Specialist).  She was promoted to specialist (SPC)/pay grade E-4 effective 1 March 2002.

3.  The applicant served in Operation Iraqi Freedom from 13 April 2003 to 9 May 2003.

4.  On 16 June 2004, the applicant was honorably discharged by reason of disability with severance pay.  She had completed 3 years, 4 months, and 2 days of active service.

5.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows she is authorized the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon.  Item 13 does not contain an entry for the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  After 27 June 1950, to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as 1 year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of active enlisted Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  In the instances of disqualification as determined by the unit commander, the commander will prepare a statement of rational for his or her decisions.
 
7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part, that the immediate unit commander's decision to award the Army Good Conduct Medal will be based on his or her personal knowledge and of the individual's official records for period of service under previous commander during the period for which the award is to be made.  The lack of official disqualifying comment by such previous commanders qualifies the use of such period toward the award by the current commander.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed her first 3-year period of service on 14 February 2004.  There is no evidence the applicant received her first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) that she was disqualified by her chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Her records do not contain any records of court-martial or instances of non-judicial punishment.  There is also no record of time lost.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence showing disqualification, it is appropriate to award the applicant the Army Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 15 February 2001 to 14 February 2004.  It would also be appropriate to add this award to item 13 of her DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 15 February 2001 to 14 February 2004 and adding this award to item 13 of her DD Form 214.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002486



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002486



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021085

    Original file (20100021085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows she served during a qualifying period for award of the Army Service Ribbon which is not shown on her DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award her the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct her records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001327

    Original file (20140001327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her deployment to Uzbekistan and Afghanistan be shown on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 9 January 2003. After 27 June 1950, to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as 1 year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of active enlisted Federal military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001300

    Original file (20150001300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service in support of OIF in Iraq from 11 October 2003 to 26 December 2003 qualified her for award of the GWOTEM; however, the applicant requests award of the ICM. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 April 2001 through 4 April 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004627

    Original file (20140004627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her foreign service in: * Kuwait for 1 month * Iraq for 1 week * Iraq for an additional 4 months 2. With respect to showing she served in Kuwait for 1 month, Iraq for 1 week, and Iraq for an additional 4 months, DFAS was only able to verify her service in Iraq for 39 days and in Kuwait for 38 days and she has not provided any evidence to support any additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019691

    Original file (20080019691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show all awards to which she is entitled for her service in Iraq from 15 April 2003 to 5 July 2003. Service members qualified for the GWOTEM by reasons of service between 19 March 2003 and 28 February 2005, in an area for which the Iraq Campaign Medal was subsequently authorized, will remain qualified for that medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019256

    Original file (20100019256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to her DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 June 2008 the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004983

    Original file (20080004983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the awards she received in Korea be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). On 4 August 2003, the applicant was recommended for award of the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 June 2002 through 1 March 2004; and b. adding the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021297

    Original file (20130021297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in Kuwait/Iraq from 13 April through 17 December 2003 (8 months and 5 days) which is not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003675

    Original file (20080003675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further states that neither her TDY service in Normandy, France or her service in Iraq in support of OIF are annotated in Item 18 of her DD Form 214, and now requests that this service be added to her DD Form 214. By regulation formal in-service training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in Item 14 (Military Education). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000778

    Original file (20140000778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no available evidence to support correcting her record to show she was awarded or authorized any additional combat medals or ribbons during her tenure of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 13 February 2001 through 12 February 2004 and b. adding to her DD Form 214 the AGCM (1st Award) and the GWOTSM. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I...