Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002358
Original file (20090002358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	21 July 2009    

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002358 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that all documentation relating to his general court-martial be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the court-martial documentation he wants removed from his OMPF has already ruined his military career and he is trying to move on with his life.  He states he is having difficulty successfully acquiring employment and the court-martial documentation in his official military personnel file is destroying his ability to provide for himself and his family.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the court-martial orders in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 April 1994.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of chemical equipment repairer and was promoted to pay grade E-7 prior to being appointed in the rank of second lieutenant effective 27 January 2005.  He was promoted to the rank of captain effective 1 September 2008.

2.  The applicant's OMPF contains General Court-Martial Order Number 12, dated 1 October 2008, which shows that the applicant was convicted of between on or about 8 September 2006 and on or about 10 February 2007, while the commander of 108th Quartermaster Company Rear Detachment, wrongfully having an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. H.B., the wife of Sergeant (E-5) S.B., 108th Quartermaster Company, which conduct is unbecoming an officer and gentleman.

3.  His sentence to be reprimanded was adjudged on 1 April 2008.  The sentence was approved and directed to be executed.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  In pertinent part, this regulation describes what forms and documents are to be filed in the OMPF and where they are to be filed.  Table 2-1 of this regulation specifies that court-martial orders are filed on the performance fiche of the OMPF if there is a finding of guilty of at least one specification.
 
5.  Army Regulation 600-37, Unfavorable Information, paragraph 7–2, Policies and standards, states that once an official document has been properly filed in the OMPF, it is presumed to be administratively correct and to have been filed pursuant to an objective decision by competent authority.  Thereafter, the burden of proof rests with the individual concerned to provide evidence of a clear and convincing nature that the document is untrue or unjust, in whole or in part, thereby warranting its alteration or removal from the OMPF.  Appeals that merely allege an injustice or error without supporting evidence are not acceptable and will not be considered.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is having difficulty successfully acquiring employment, and that the court-martial documentation in his official military personnel file is destroying his ability to provide for himself and his family.

2.  In accordance with Army Regulation 600-37, the applicant must provide evidence of a clear and convincing nature that the document is untrue or unjust, in whole or in part, thereby warranting its removal from the OMPF.  The applicant has not provided any evidence or argument to show the court-martial documentation is untrue or unjust and his court-martial documentation is filed in accordance with regulatory policy.

3.  The ABCMR does not change properly constituted records solely for the purpose of mitigating employment problems.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_____X___  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002358



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002358



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100659C070208

    Original file (2004100659C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following corrections: removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), administrative separation board (ASB) proceedings and promotion flagging orders from his official military personnel file (OMPF); a change to the narrative reason for his discharge; promotion to lieutenant colonel with a date of rank of 15 August 2000 and back pay for 20 years; and issue of a Twenty-Year Letter, dated on or about 5 March 1999. The applicant states, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002188

    Original file (20090002188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of an Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) letter, dated 25 June 2007, and a Memorandum, Subject: Action to Remove Reprimand, dated 28 November 2006 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 15 February 2007, the DASEB considered the applicant's request to have the GOMOR in question removed from his OMPF and opined that given the GO issuing the GOMORhad reconsidered his decision after finding the original action was determined to be untrue...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017321

    Original file (20080017321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice]) from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). It states, in pertinent part, applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080007602

    Original file (AR20080007602.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 29 August 2001, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Following a closed hearing where all matters presented in defense, mitigation, and/or extenuation were considered, the commander affixed his signature in Item 4 of the document directing “[n]o punishment, no evidence to say this NCO has done anything wrong.” Item 5 of this document shows the commander directed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013103

    Original file (20110013103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's contention that the information contained in the GOMOR is unsubstantiated and filing of the GOMOR in his OMPF is unjust and should be removed or transferred to the restricted section of his OMPF has been carefully considered. The evidence of record confirms the GOMOR was properly processed and filed in the applicant's OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006661

    Original file (20150006661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: The applicant requests removal of the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 30 January 2014, from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states, in effect: * the GOMOR resulted from an incident in which she was charged with driving while intoxicated by civilian authority * her case was dismissed and therefore the GOMOR should be removed * she feels her commander acted too quickly, not waiting first for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029900

    Original file (20100029900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). c Paragraph 3-37b(1)(a) states that whether to file a record of NJP in the restricted section of the Soldier's OMPF rests with the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015671

    Original file (20140015671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests either the reversal of the action or removal of any documents related to unsatisfactory participation during his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for the period 29 August 1991 to 25 January 2000. Army Regulation 600-8-104 states, once placed in the OMPF, a document becomes a permanent part of that file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009468

    Original file (20100009468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 16 December 2005, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 3-37b(1)(a) of the military justice regulation states, in pertinent part, that whether to file a record of NJP in the performance section of the Soldier's OMPF rests with the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states, in pertinent part,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017018

    Original file (20090017018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 12 December 2001, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The evidence of record confirms that the applicant elected not to demand a trial by court-martial and chose to have his case disposed of through Article 15 proceedings at a closed hearing with his commander. The evidence of record further shows that this DA Form 2627 is properly...