Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002294
Original file (20090002294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002294 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and the orders releasing her from active duty, effective 30 October 2008, be revoked and removed from her records. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was released from active duty on 30 October 2008 and issued a DD Form 214.  However, she was also issued new active duty orders on the same date of her discharge.  Therefore, she did not have a break in service and she continues to serve on active duty today.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214, dated 30 October 2008; a copy of Orders 303-003, issued by the U.S. Army Installation Management Command, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort McCoy, WI, on 29 October 2008; a copy of Orders A-10-720981, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, MO, on 16 October 2007; a copy of Orders A-10-720981A01, issued by HRC-St. Louis, on 23 January 2008; a copy of Orders A-10-821921, issued by HRC-St. Louis, on 30 October 20078; and a copy of Orders                A-10-821921A01, issued by HRC-St. Louis, on 30 October 2008, in support of her request.

4.  On 29 April 2009, by fax, the applicant submitted a copy of her mobilization Orders 06-138-00180, issued by the Army Reserve Medical Command, Pinellas Park, FL, on 18 May 2006, in support of her application.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  With prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as an Army Nurse second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and executed an oath of office on 10 May 1996.  She subsequently completed various training courses, served in various staff and leadership positions, and was promoted to captain on 6 August 2002.  

2.  On 8 June 2006, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 12302, for a period of 545 days beginning on 8 June 2006.  She subsequently served in Iraq from 26 September 2006 to 27 September 2007.

3.  On 16 October 2007, the applicant voluntarily requested extension on active duty and was accordingly ordered to active duty for the purpose of contingency operations for active duty operational support (CO-ADOS) under the provisions of Title 10, USC, section 12301(d) for a period of 11 months and 30 days beginning on 1 November 2007 and ending on 30 October 2008.  She was assigned to the 181st Infantry Brigade, Fort McCoy, WI.

4.  On 1 May 2008, she was promoted to the rank of major.  On 29 October 2008, the U.S. Army Installation Management Command, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort McCoy, WI, published Orders 303-003, releasing the applicant from active duty to the control of her USAR unit, effective 30 October 2008. 

5.  On 30 October 2008, the applicant was accordingly honorably released from active duty to the control of her USAR unit.  The DD Form 214 she was issued shows she entered active duty this period on 8 June 2006 and was separated on 30 October 2008.  She completed 2 years, 4 months, and 23 days of creditable active military service during this period. 

6.  On 30 October 2008, HRC-St. Louis, MO, published Orders A-10-821921 ordering the applicant to active duty for another period of voluntary CO-ADOS under the provisions of Title 10, USC, section 12301(d) for a period of 365 days beginning on 31 October 2008 and ending on 30 October 2009.  She was assigned to the Warrior Transition Unit, Fort Hood, TX.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her DD Form 214 and the orders releasing her from active duty, effective 30 October 2008, should be revoked and removed from her records.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was ordered to active duty, on 8 June 2006, in support of Operation Iraq Freedom.  Prior to release from active duty, she requested and was authorized a voluntary extension to remain on active duty until 30 October 2008.  Upon completion of this period of active duty, separation orders were initiated to release her from active duty and a DD Form 214 was accordingly submitted to accurately capture and document this period of active duty service.  There is neither an error nor an injustice associated with the release from active duty order and/or the DD Form 214.

3.  The evidence of record also shows that on the same date she was released from active duty (30 October 2008), a new set of orders were initiated by HRC-St. Louis that further placed her on active duty, effective 31 October 2008, for a new mission, at a new location, for a period of 1 year.  Upon conclusion of this period of active duty, she will receive another DD Form 214 to capture and document this period of active duty service.   

4.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of compelling information to the contrary, there is no basis for revoking the applicant's DD Form 214 or the orders releasing her from active duty on 
30 October 2008.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.






ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002294



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002294



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517

    Original file (20090014517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019406

    Original file (20090019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her 31 July 2009 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an entry date of 30 August 2006. The instructions for item 12a are to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of a DD Form 214 for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record contains permanent orders which show the applicant was ordered to active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002892

    Original file (20110002892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * page 40 of Department of the Army Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) Consolidated Guidance, dated 18 July 2008 * Orders A-11-823251, dated 17 November 2008, ordering him to active duty for contingency operations for operational support (CO-ADOS) in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) * letter from a physician, dated 16 July 2009 * memorandum, dated 31 August 2009, regarding his MEB * Orders 301-1006, dated 28 October 2009, releasing him from active duty not by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006869

    Original file (20070006869.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she is entitled to a 15-year non-regular retirement based on her medical disqualification from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). On 19 September 2006, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, informed the applicant by memorandum that the PEB determined that she was unfit for duty and that she was permanently disqualified and must be separated from the USAR. On 18 October 2006, HRC St. Louis, Missouri, published Orders Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021035

    Original file (20140021035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Due to the limited time between implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, on 1 August 2009, and his retirement on 28 February 2010, he was not afforded sufficient information or an opportunity to apply for and receive a Certificate of Eligibility and request transfer of his benefits to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024664

    Original file (20100024664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA PPG, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, provided that RC Soldiers who voluntarily requested to serve beyond their 24-month mobilization authorized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code could request an extension under the policy guidance for CO-ADOS. The evidence also shows she requested and was granted a voluntary extension of her mobilization in a CO-ADOS status which began on 22 July 2009 and resulted in her serving continuously in Iraq from 25 October 2008...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002464

    Original file (20070002464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her former spouse did complete his 20 years of qualifying service for retirement, that he did request transfer to the Retired Reserve and that he was granted his 20-year retirement letter notifying him of his eligibility for retirement at age 60. The 20-year letter shows the deceased Soldier completed the required years of qualifying service and that he was eligible for retired pay on application at age 60. The applicant, the deceased Soldier's former spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021201

    Original file (20140021201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of an enlistment or seasonal bonus for his Regular Army enlistment in 2005. The applicant states he enlisted in the Reserve Component (RC) to Active Component (AC) under Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 05-143, dated 16 June 2005, subject: Enlistment of Mobilized USAR or Army National Guard Soldiers into the Regular Army. MILPER Message 05-241, dated 3 October 2005, subject: Enlistment Bonus Program Changes, stated effective 3 October 2005, a prior service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010577

    Original file (20080010577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 September 2007, the National Guard Bureau, Arlington, Virginia, published Orders 257-5, honorably discharging the applicant from the ARNG, effective 9 July 2007, and terminating her Reserve of the Army and Army of the United States appointments. On 13 May 2008, by memorandum, the applicant requested a waiver of the statutory education requirements for promotion to CPT. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012856

    Original file (20060012856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The first such promotion board was the CY2003 IRR/IMA/EAD board. In conclusion, the G1 advisory opinion stated the applicant's 1999 promotion was erroneous and was properly revoked.