Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002223
Original file (20090002223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 JULY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002223 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Army Achievement Medal (AAM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that upon clearing, he did not bring his certificates to submit for the preparation of his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty, on 20 June 2002, and that he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and the Skill Qualification Identifier of P (Parachutist).  

3.  The Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or certificates showing the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM, AAM, CIB and/or EIB.  

4.  On 19 June 2005, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of sergeant, after completing 3 years of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed no overseas service in item 12f (foreign service) and item 18 documents no overseas deployments with his unit.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Parachutist Badge.  

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains preparation instructions for the DD Form 214 and states, in pertinent part, that the source records and documents used for preparation of the DD Form 214 include the Enlisted Records Brief and any other document authorized for filing in the OMPF.  The instructions for item 13 state, in pertinent part, to list awards and decorations for all periods of service and to verify each entry by the Soldier's records.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the ARCOM, AAM, CIB and EIB should be added to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  By regulation, all awards entered on the DD Form 214 must be verified by the Soldier's records.  In this case, the applicant's OMPF is void of any orders, certificates, or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded any of the awards in question by proper authority while serving on active duty, and his record documents no overseas and/or combat service.  In addition, the applicant has failed to provide any documentary evidence to support his claim that he earned these awards.  As a result, absent any evidence of record or independent evidence from the applicant to support his claim, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  
3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _XXX______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002223



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002223


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003731

    Original file (20110003731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by documenting his completion of the Recondo School in 1988, and by adding the following awards: * Combat Parachute Badge * Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) 2. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014668

    Original file (20110014668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 6 years and 26 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Global War on Terrorism Service Medal. The applicant indicated that he had no records and that he did not receive his DD Form 214 at the time of discharge. Accordingly, the award of the AFEM should be added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002898

    Original file (20120002898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following: * award of the: * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) * Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM) * Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) * Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM) * Combat Infantryman Bade (CIB) * Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) * British Military Parachutist Badge * Shoulder Sleeve Insignia –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001716

    Original file (20130001716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) * EIB certificate * ARCOM and AAM orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The certificate provided by the applicant which states he successfully completed EIB training in 2004 and the entry on his DA Form 638 which states he received the EIB are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base adding the EIB to his DD Form 214. The Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004874

    Original file (20120004874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 11 (Primary Specialty) – 3 years, 10 months, and 15 days * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – * Order of the Spur * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) * Purple Heart * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award) * item 14 (Military Education) – * Airborne School, 3 weeks, February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020938

    Original file (20100020938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders awarding him the CIB * A memorandum from his commander with a copy of Permanent Orders 337-002 requesting that the applicant be awarded the AFEM for participating in combat operations in Afghanistan during the period 10 October 2001 to 7 January 2002 * A memorandum from his commander with a copy of Permanent Orders 337-01 requesting that the applicant be awarded the AFEM with Arrowhead Device for a combat jump into enemy territory on 19 October 2001 * A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000644

    Original file (20080000644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Letter, dated 12 December 2007; DD Form 214; Department of the Army (DA) PUC General Orders (GO) Number (#) 25, dated 8 June 2001 and GO # 75, dated 2 December 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66); and Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division Special Orders (SO) # 32, dated 1 February 1968. However, the evidence of record confirms his entitlement to one award of the PUC based on his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091562C070212

    Original file (2003091562C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, his record does show that he earned the PH, for being wounded in action while serving in the RVN and that he received the Parachutist Badge based on his completion of the Airborne Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021903

    Original file (20130021903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It shows the applicant successfully completed the EIB test and was awarded the EIB. Furthermore, there is no evidence showing he had ever actively participated in such ground combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003653C070208

    Original file (20040003653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of the applicant’s DA Form 2- 1 shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Senior Parachutist Badge, Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR)-Numeral 2, Army Service Ribbon (ASR), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), Expert Qualification Badge with Rifle, Mortar and Automatic Rifle Bars, and Marksman Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar. Thus, his...