IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 July 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002215
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and his combat service.
2. The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect his combat service.
3. The applicant provides a copy of a Western Union Telegram and a DD Form 214 in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 22 January 1965 and upon completion of initial entry training was awarded military occupational specialty 31B (Field Radio Mechanic). He was involuntarily ordered to active duty on 15 May 1968 and entered active duty on 26 May 1968. He served in Vietnam from 14 May 1969 to 19 November 1969 while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry. He was honorably released from active duty on 22 November 1969.
3. Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "0 6 9."
4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal as authorized awards.
5. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 7296, dated 21 June 1969, awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 14 June 1969. However, these orders were revoked by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 9199, dated 20 July 1969.
6. The Vietnam casualty roster shows the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on 14 June 1969.
7. The applicant provided a copy of a Western Union Telegram from The Adjutant General, Department of the Army, addressed to his spouse stating that the applicant had been slightly wounded in action in Vietnam on 14 June 1969 by fragments while at an artillery firing position when the area came under attack by a hostile force.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
9. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. At the time, the regulation required the last overseas theater to be entered in item 22c. The regulation did not require Vietnam service dates to be entered on the form.
10. A review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. It shows the unit the applicant was assigned to while in Vietnam was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for actions during the period 18 March 1968 through 2 May 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.
12. Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows the campaigns for Vietnam.
During the applicant's tour in Vietnam he participated in three campaigns: the Tet 69 Counteroffensive, Vietnam Summer-Fall, and Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
14. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. He was released from active duty in the rank of specialist five with 1 year, 5 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with no lost time. His records do not contain adverse information and his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his conduct and efficiency ratings as "excellent" throughout his period of active duty service.
15. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and his combat service has been carefully reviewed and found to have merit.
2. General orders awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 14 June 1969. Although these orders were later revoked, the reason for the revocation is unknown. Based on the fact that his name is listed on the Vietnam casualty roster as being wounded as a result of hostile action and the Western Union Telegram provided which states the same, there is sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant was assigned to a unit which was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show these unit awards.
4. The applicant was credited with participation in three campaigns while in Vietnam. He is therefore entitled to three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
5. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this award.
6. The applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist five with 1 year, 5 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with no lost time. He has no derogatory information in his records and his conduct and efficiency were rated as "excellent" throughout his active duty service. The applicant therefore met the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 May 1968 to 22 November 1969 and it should be awarded to him at this time.
7. The applicant's records shows he served in Vietnam for 6 months and 9 days but the theater where he performed his foreign service is not identified on his DD Form 214. Therefore, item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214 should be amended to add "USARPAC" (i.e., U.S. Army Pacific Command). This entry, combined with the addition of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214, will confirm his combat service.
BOARD VOTE:
__X_____ ___X___ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 14 June 1969;
b. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 May 1968 to 22 November 1969; and
c. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and three bronze service stars to be worn on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal; and
d. adding the entry, "USARPAC" in item 22c of the applicant's DD Form 214.
__________X_______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002215
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002215
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016724
The applicant states he sustained a fragment wound from an enemy mortar on 25 May 1968 and notes that the Purple Heart is not annotated on his 1968 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 25 May 1968 as a result...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003460C070205
The applicant requests two awards of the Purple Heart, two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and military instructor school be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Additionally, the Purple Heart Certificate is sufficient evidence to correct his records to show this award; as a result, the applicant is entitled to two Purple Hearts, one for this wound, and one (which has already been added) for the wound he incurred on 18 May...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001203C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23 February 1969 while serving in Vietnam; however, his discharge document does not show the award. The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army on 6 March 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 23...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003161C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003161 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016364
He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to Company E, 1st Battalion of the 501st Infantry in Vietnam from 16 December 1967 until he was wounded in action on 22 March 1968 and transferred to the United States on 18 April 1968 for further medical treatment. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079219C070215
In support of his application, he submits a copy of a Western Union telegram, dated 18 February 1968 and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There are no orders available to the Board which authorized award of the Purple Heart to the applicant. Upon review, the Board has determined that this evidence is sufficient as a basis to correct his military records to show award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002048
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart due to wounds received in Vietnam on 26 August 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect this award. The evidence shows that the applicant served in Vietnam from 29 May 1968 to 28 May 1969 and met the criteria for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009823
The applicant states the FSM should have received the Purple Heart because he was wounded on 22 April 1967 in Vietnam. The applicant provides: * Service medical records * FSM's death certificate * FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Page 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Western Union telegram CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001327
The applicant's military service records show that he was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer in the Army of the United States on 15 July 1968. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 7 April 1969 and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025322
Headquarters, 3d Field Hospital General Orders Number 154, dated 3 June 1969, show he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 June 1969 in Vietnam. Although he contends he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds (left eye/head and back) received in action on 3 June 1969 when his vehicle went over a landmine and the entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20 also shows he was wounded on 3 June 1969, orders show he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 June...