Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001965
Original file (20090001965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001965 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 September 2007 be changed to 4 September 2004 and item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) be changed to include his 2 months and 1 day of active service for Desert Storm.  Additionally, he requests that the award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB) be deleted from item 18 (Remarks).

2.  The applicant states that item 12a of his DD Form 214 does not reflect the initial call-up period for mobilization from 4 September 2004.  He also maintains that item 12d does not reflect his call-up period for Desert Storm from 22 January 1991 to 22 March 1991.  The applicant offers that the award of the CAB should be deleted because he was never in combat and all of his military service was performed in the United States.

3.  The applicant provides Orders 1-1 with Annex E, dated 22 January 1991; Orders 3-1 with Annex A, dated 15 March 1991; Orders 04-234-00007, dated 21 August 2004; Orders 05-201-00003, dated 20 July 2005; Orders A-07-617576, dated 11 July 2006; Orders A-07-617576A01, dated 13 July 2006; Orders A-07-617576A02, dated 2 April 2007; Orders 218-1301, dated 6 August 2007; Orders 220-1314, dated 8 August 2007, three DD Forms 214; and two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to have his call-up period for mobilization from 4 September 2004 added to his DD Form 214.  Information obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) indicates that the applicant received active duty pay in a Reserve status from 1 November 2004 through 15 December 2005.  The applicant is required to have a new DD Form 214 prepared to cover this period of active service instead of correcting the existing form.  The applicant has been notified by separate correspondence of the procedures for requesting a DD Form 214; as a result, his call-up mobilization period in 2004 will not be discussed further in the Record of Proceedings.

2.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the United States Army National Guard on 15 January 1982.  On 27 October 1989, the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and, through a series of reenlistments, has continuously served in the USAR.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period from 19 July 1982 to 11 December 1982 credited him with 4 months and 23 days of active Federal service.

4.  Orders 1-1, dated 22 January 1991, and Orders 3-1, dated 15 March 1991, show that the applicant was ordered to active duty effective 22 January 1991 and was released from active duty on 22 March 1991.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period from 22 January 1991 to 25 March 1991 shows that he was credited with 2 months and 4 days of active Federal service.  However, his DD Form 215 corrected his separation date to 22 March 1991 and credited him with 2 months and 1 day of active Federal service.

6.  Orders A-07-617576, dated 11 July 2006, show that the applicant was ordered to active duty from 4 September 2006 through 3 September 2007 for a period of 365 days.  He received two amendments to these orders changing the reporting unit from the U.S. Army Military Police, Military Police School to the 3rd Chemical Brigade, changing the period of active duty from 365 days to 1 year including accumulated leave, and amending the purpose from Contingency Operations Temporary Tour of Active Duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) to Contingency Operations for Active Duty for Operational Support (CO-ADOS) in support of OEF.  Orders 218-1301, dated 6 August 2007, released the applicant from active duty effective 3 September 2007.

7.  Item 12a of the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 2007 shows the date he entered active duty this period as 4 September 2006.  Item 12d shows his total prior active service as 6 months and 27 days.  Additionally, item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) continued in item 18 shows he was awarded the CAB.

8.  There are no orders in the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) that show he was awarded the CAB.  The CAB is not listed on his previous DD Forms 214 or his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record).  Additionally, there is no indication that the applicant was deployed and served in a combat zone or imminent danger area.

9.  There are no other DD Forms 214 or documents in the applicant's OMPF that show he was credited with any additional active duty service other than the three DD Forms 214 previously discussed.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations) establishes standardized procedures for preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states, in pertinent part, to enter the total prior active service in item 12d from previously issued DD Forms 214, less lost time, if any.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 states, in pertinent part, to enter in item 13 all awards and decorations for all periods of service.  Each entry will be verified by the Soldier's records.  Use item 18 as a continuation for entries in items 11, 13, and 14.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the requirements for award of the Combat Action Badge are branch and MOS immaterial.  Assignment to a combat arms unit or a unit organized to conduct close or offensive combat operations or performing offensive combat operations is not required to qualify for the Combat Action Badge.  However, it is not intended to award the Combat Action Badge to all Soldiers who serve in a combat zone or imminent danger area.  The Soldier must be performing assigned duties in an area where hostile fire pay or imminent danger pay is authorized.  The Soldier must be personally present and actively engaging or being engaged by the enemy, and performing satisfactorily in accordance with the prescribed rules of engagement.  The Soldier must [not] be assigned or attached to a unit that would qualify the Soldier for the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Medical Badge.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 dated 3 September 2007, credited him with 6 months and 27 days of prior-active service which is consistent with the active service listed on his previous DD Forms 214:  4 months and 23 days (1982) and 2 months and 4 days, corrected to 2 months and 1 day (1991).  Therefore, it  appears that the applicant's Desert Storm time is included on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 2007.  However, based on the correction listed for item 12c on the applicant's DD Form 215, his prior active service in item 12d should be corrected to show 6 months and 24 days.

2.  Item 12d of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 2007 may require further correction after he obtains his DD Form 214 for his period of mobilization beginning in September 2004.  When he receives that DD Form 214, he may apply to the Board for this correction.

3.  There are no orders in the applicant's OMPF that show he was awarded the CAB.  The CAB is not listed on his DA Form 2-1 and there is no indication that the applicant was deployed and served in a combat zone or imminent danger area.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove this award from his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing 6 months and 24 days in item 12d of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 2007; and


	b.  deleting the Combat Action Badge from item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 2007.



      ___________x______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001965



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001965



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004208

    Original file (20090004208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records do not contain orders that show he was awarded the CAB and/or the CIB. Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry specialty and satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the CAB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009471

    Original file (20070009471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also states that award of the CAB is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined. Also, in order for the applicant to qualify for the CIB he had to be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023193

    Original file (20100023193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his foreign service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) * award of the Iraq Campaign Medal, Combat Action Badge, Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Army Achievement Medal 2. Furthermore, this period of service qualifies him for award of the Iraq Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013002

    Original file (20140013002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 29 March 2007 to show: a. his rank as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and b. award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB). The sworn statements and narrative for award of the CAB provided by the applicant which state he distinguished himself by being personally engaged by the enemy while serving with the 65th Military Police Company (Airborne) on 14 April 2005 during Operation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021006

    Original file (20120021006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Action Badge (CAB). The request he now submits to the board contains two eyewitness statements prepared more than 2 years after the incident that place the applicant anywhere from 100 to 150 meters from the impact or blast.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013636

    Original file (20060013636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the CAB and MUC after he was separated and issued his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the CAB for his active engagement with enemy forces on 29 June 2003, and that his unit was awarded the MUC during his tenure of assignment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000173

    Original file (20070000173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of a second Army Good Conduct Medal, two awards of the Combat Action Badge, and any other awards he may be authorized. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served a qualifying period of time for two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him a second Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004118

    Original file (20130004118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since his DD Form 214 shows the SWASM with two bronze service stars, this portion of his request will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the requirements for award of the CAB are branch and MOS immaterial. Since the CAB is only retroactive to 18 September 2001, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to award him the CAB and add this badge to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 August 1991.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007030

    Original file (20080007030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) instead of the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and that he contributed to the MGIB. Upon confirmation from their chain that the enemy was setting up a mortar system for an indirect fire attack, he and the other two Soldiers fired an initial volley of three high-explosive (HE) rounds. Furthermore, the applicant evidence of record shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and engaged the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016010

    Original file (20060016010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member Ms. Karmin S. Jenkins Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant believes that the Commander, 1st Infantry Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-22 for the types of missions conducted by his platoon in support of the various units. Orders 049-002, 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, dated 18 February 2005, awarded the...