Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001907
Original file (20090001907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  19 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019007 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration that his records be corrected to reflect a last name of “VALADEZ” instead of “VALEDEZ”. 

2.  The applicant states that his last name is incorrectly spelled in his military records.  He contends this correction is needed to process his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) paperwork. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate, a copy of a United States of America Passport and a copy of a National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090000136, on 1 May 2009.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service member’s records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  A reconstructed record is being used which consists of his DD Form 214  with the period ending 24 May 1955, a copy of United States of America Passport, issued on 10 April 2004, NA Form 13038, and a copy of an amended certificate of birth. 
3.  On 11 December 2008, the applicant applied to the ABCMR to correct the spelling of his last name.  At that time he provided a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his United States of America Passport.  On 1 May 2009, the board denied the request based on insufficient evidence to show that an error or injustice occurred on the part of the Army.  The applicant has provided a standard certificate of birth which will be considered new evidence.

4.  His DD Form 214 shows that on 4 June 1952, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of three years.  On 24 May 1955, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years, 11 months and 21 days of creditable active duty service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows his last name spelled as “VALEDEZ” and he signed the DD Form 214 with that spelling.  

5.  A review of the documents available in the applicant’s records show that his last name was spelled “VALEDEZ” throughout his service and that he signed those documents spelled the same way.  

6.  The birth certificate he submits is an amended Certificate of Birth dated, 9 October 2009 which changes the spelling of his last name from “VALEDEZ” to “VALADEZ”.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  This regulation has historically stated that item 1 (Last Name, First Name, and Middle Name) of the DD Form 214 will contain the name taken from the Soldier’s personnel record.

8.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant‘s contention that his last name shown in his military records should be changed from “VALEDEZ” to “VALADEZ” was carefully considered but was not supported by the evidence.

2.  The last name shown on his DD Form 214 and other available service documents show that he spelled his last name “VALEDEZ” and served his entire military career with his last name spelled that way.  It also appears that his signature reflected the same spelling.  

3.  Although the applicant has provided an amended copy of his birth certificate showing his last name spelled as “VALADEZ”, he has provided no explanation as to why he spelled his last name differently when he enlisted.

4.  There is no evidence that suggests the applicant has or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining its records with the name under which he served.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in the available records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  While it is understandable that the applicant desires to now record his current last name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date. 

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms his current name, will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions in regard to the difference in the name recorded in his military records and to satisfy his desire to have his current name documented in his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  __x______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 






are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in 
Docket Number AR20090000136, dated 1 May 2009.



      _______ _   ___x____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.e


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019007





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019007



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000136

    Original file (20090000136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his last name as Valadez. However, the Passport alone is insufficient evidence to show that his last name of Valedez on his DD Form 214 should be corrected, and he has not shown that the Army's records are indeed wrong. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012799

    Original file (20140012799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his National Archives and Records Administration (NA) Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service) and his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the proper spelling of his last name and his accurate discharge date, rank/grade at discharge, and date of birth. Based on this information, the applicant's request pertaining to correction of his NA Form 13038 will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013436

    Original file (20130013436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect, he believes a typographical error occurred during the preparation of his DD Forms 214. Although the applicant’s military records are not available for review, he provides a copy of his Certificate of Naturalization, issued to him on 9 September 1954, while he was on active duty, showing 8 June 1926 as his DOB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002992

    Original file (20090002992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He further requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect all military awards to which he is entitled. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002992 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090002992 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019159

    Original file (20140019159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His last name is reflected on both documents as "G---N." d. Newspaper clippings, photographs, and assorted documents which predominantly show the applicant's last name listed as "G---N" during his service; however, there are instances subsequent to his service which list the spelling of his last name and race as he requests. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011493

    Original file (20140011493.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his retirement orders to show his last name as "R________lave." His retirement orders show his last name spelled as "R______lve". As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his retirement orders to show his name as "R______lave" as shown on the DD Form 1343.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015345

    Original file (20130015345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His separation orders show his name using the suffix "Jr." The available documents in his reconstructed record do not show his DOB. The only justification for changing his name or DOB on his DD Form 214 would be if they were not consistent with his name or DOB shown on his initial enlistment documents. _______ X_ _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006205

    Original file (20110006205.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000077

    Original file (20100000077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the spelling of his last name as "F_Y__" instead of "F_I__." His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows the spelling of his last name as "F_I__." The evidence of record shows the applicant used the spelling of his last name as "F_I__" upon his induction into the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017704

    Original file (20140017704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and, in effect, all other records to show his middle and last names as "R--N W---H" instead of "B---N W---E." 2. The applicant's records contain various personnel documents that show the applicant's middle and last names as "B---N W---E." Many of these forms are authenticated by the applicant using this name. The evidence of record shows that upon his enlistment in the RA on 23 July...