Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001730
Original file (20090001730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001730 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be provided back retired pay and allowances from 2 October 1999, the date he was placed on the Retired List.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that for the past 10 years he has called and written to the Department of the Army (DA) requesting retirement after 22 years of service.  He claims the response was always that his records could not be found and he kept receiving incomplete retirement points summaries they had available.  He finally requested the assistance of a Member of Congress and his information was forwarded to DA through her office.  Three months later he was notified that 2 additional years of qualifying service were found and he was provided this information and his retirement request to DA at St. Louis.  He was then notified that he could only be provided with 6 years of back pay as a result of the statute of limitations.  Finally, in October 2008, he received back pay for 6 years and began receiving his retired pay.  He claims since the error that caused him not to receive retirement within the statute of limitations was through no fault of his own, since he has been attempting to receive his retirement throughout all these years, he should have received back retired pay from October of 1999, the date he was eligible to be placed on the Retired List.  He is now requesting he be paid the 3 years of back retired pay from 1999 through 2002, because the Government failed to maintain his records properly and caused the delay in his receiving retirement pay.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, retirement orders, and a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letter with attachments, dated 14 April 2008, in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he served on active duty in the United States Navy for 4 years and 1 month between October 1956 and November 1960 and in the United States Army for 2 years, 11 months and 25 days from 8 December 1960 through 2 December 1963.

3.  The applicant's record also shows that upon his discharge from the Regular Army in 1963, he entered the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), where he served through 4 November 1967.

4.  On 15 September 1973, after a break in service between 5 November 1967 and 14 September 1973, the applicant entered the Army National Guard (ARNG), where he served through 14 September 1979.

5.  On 15 September 1979, the applicant transferred from the ARNG to the USAR, where he continued to serve through 24 July 1985 when he was honorably discharged.

6.  A Reserve Personnel Accounting Statement on file in the applicant's record shows that during his military service between 1956 and 1985, he completed a total of 21 years, 1 month, and 2 days of qualifying service for Reserve retirement.

7.  The applicant's record confirms that Reserve retirement officials from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, did not confirm the applicant's qualifying service and eligibility for retirement until sometime in February 2008, at which time he was mailed the forms to submit for retirement.

8.  On 14 April 2008, HRC-St. Louis Orders P04-805121 directed the applicant's retirement and placement on the Retired List in the rank of staff sergeant effective 2 October 1999.

9.  In a 16 September 2008 letter to a Member of Congress, DFAS officials indicated that the applicant's retirement packet was received on 18 April 2008 and he was paid $32,886.57 (gross payment of $46,750.10 less Federal taxes of $13,757.23 and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums of $106.30) on 10 September 2008, and that on 1 October 2008, the applicant would begin to receive monthly retired pay.  DFAS officials also informed the Member of Congress that in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3702, commonly known as the barring statute, they were only allowed to pay retroactive military retired pay back to 6 years prior to the claim, or 8 March 2002, and if the applicant believed he suffered an injustice or that his DFAS record was in error regarding his military pay, he could apply to this Board for a final determination.

10.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues. 
Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should not be subjected to the barring statute given he has been attempting to correct his records for the past 10 years was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that HRC-St. Louis retirement officials were not able to confirm the applicant's qualifying service and retirement eligibility until February 2008, almost 9 years after the date the applicant was eligible to receive retired pay.  As a result, given it appears the delay in processing the applicant's retirement was through no fault of his own, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's record to show was found to be eligible for a non-regular retirement prior to 2 October 1999 and that he applied for and was granted retirement and was placed on the Retired List on 2 October 1999.  Further, based on this records correction, it would also be appropriate to provide him all back retired pay and allowances due from 2 October 1999 through 2 August 2002, which he was previously denied under the barring statute.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was found to be eligible for a non-regular retirement prior to        2 October 1999, that he applied for and was granted retirement and was placed on the Retired List on 2 October 1999, and by providing him all back retired pay due from 2 October 1999 through 2 August 2002.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001730



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001730


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010800

    Original file (20070010800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM's OMPF also contains a SBP Election Certificate (DD Form 1883), dated 8 January 1990, in which the FSM elected full "Spouse and Children" coverage under Option C (Immediate Coverage). On 5 July 2007, the applicant contacted the Transition and Separations Branch, HRC-St. Louis which informed her that the FSM had made a Reserve Component (RC) SBP election for Option C (Immediate Coverage);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022764

    Original file (20100022764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a waiver of the Barring Act and payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity she is due based on the death of her husband, a former service member (FSM). On 19 December 2007, DFAS informed the applicant her request for RCSBP benefits was being denied based on the Barring Statute because her claim had not been submitted within 6 years of the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011636

    Original file (20090011636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The GAARNG should have placed the FSM in the Retired Reserve for medical reasons and issued him a 15-year letter. The evidence of record shows the FSM was discharged from the GAARNG on 2 July 1991 by reason of medical unfitness. He was discharged from the Selected Reserve effective July 1991, over a year before the authority to issue 15-year letters was enacted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002680

    Original file (20130002680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of all retired back pay effective from the date of his eligibility for retired pay. Nonetheless, the evidence of record shows the applicant was eligible to receive retired pay effective 28 March 1998. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was notified in a timely manner that he was eligible for retired pay at age 60, that he applied for retired pay in a timely manner to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017302

    Original file (20130017302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the Army paid him for six years of retirement pay, but he is owed payment for ten years * he entered a buy-out program (Reserve Special Separation Pay (RSSP)) on 15 October 1994; a condition for entering the buy-out program required he submit his retirement papers * he believes the U.S. Army lost his retirement papers and he was not paid his retirement when he reached age 60 on 19 March 2002 * he would like to receive the additional four years retirement pay that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000043

    Original file (20150000043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The applicant contends that the records of the FSM should be corrected to show she filed a timely application for the receipt of his RCSBP annuity. Therefore, the FSM's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010872

    Original file (20090010872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states the following: a. the applicant initially requested a survivor benefit annuity on 23 February 2006 but was denied by Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, MO because the FSM elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage for his first wife. The FSM's military record contains a DD Form 1883, dated 19 September 1993, which shows in section II, Item 8 that he elected SBP coverage for spouse and children and in 9c that he elected Option C (Immediate coverage). As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019406

    Original file (20090019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her 31 July 2009 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an entry date of 30 August 2006. The instructions for item 12a are to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of a DD Form 214 for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record contains permanent orders which show the applicant was ordered to active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091598C070212

    Original file (2003091598C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record contains active duty separation documents that confirm the applicant completed a total of 19 years, 1 month, and 18 days of active military service as of his final separation date of 14 July 1997. The information and documents considered during this review included all the documents provided by the applicant, the retired account data on file at HRC, St. Louis, and all available master pay account documents provided by the DFAS. Although the review of the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010698

    Original file (20090010698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 28 October 1985 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date in lieu of being discharged. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that each Reserve component Soldier who completes the service required to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 will be...