Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001429
Original file (20090001429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	   28 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001429 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Expeditionary Medal (Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal when he was sent to the Dominican Republic and it does not show on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 24 September 1963, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 23 September 1966 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  He completed 
2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service and the highest rank/grade he held during his tenure of service was Specialist Five (SP5)/E-5.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists the National Defense Service Medal.  It does not show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in Item 31
(Foreign Service) shows that he served in the Dominican Republic from 3 May 1965 to 21 May 1966.  Item 41 (Awards and Decoration), shows the National Defense Service Medal.  It does not show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance to friendly foreign nations.  Qualifications for this award includes the requirements to be a bona fide member in a unit engaged in the operation or to serve in the area of operations for 30 days, or to be engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involves entering the area of operations.  The regulation also provides that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal may be awarded if the individual served the full period in cases when the operation is less than 30 days in duration, if the individual is engaged in actual combat with armed opposition regardless of the period of service, if the individual participates as a member of an aircraft flying in support of the operation, or if the individual is recommended (or attached to a unit recommended) for award of the medal if the above criteria have not been met.  The designated military operations and dates of eligibility for this award are specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that he is entitled to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was carefully considered and found to be without merit.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s military service records that shows he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  There also is no evidence in his records that shows he served in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations to assist friendly foreign nations.  The qualifications for this award includes the requirements to be a bona fide member in a unit engaged in the operation or to serve in the area of operations for 30 days, or to be engaged in direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.  There is no evidence in his available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to support of his request.  In view of all of the foregoing, the applicant provides insufficient documentary evidence to support his claim for award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal in this case.

2.  The sincerity of the applicant’s request for the Expeditionary Medal is not in question.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support granting his request. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

_____X___  _____X___  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001429



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001429



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013449

    Original file (20090013449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013449 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record fails to support the applicant's contention that he served 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days in the Dominican Republic during the authorized designated period from 28 April to 16 September 1965 (i.e., the date of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013913

    Original file (20090013913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013913 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for Thailand and Cambodia. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086032C070212

    Original file (2003086032C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 27 April 1972 be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by; a. awarding the applicant the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for the period ending 30 August 1968. c. amending the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 April 1972 to show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010481

    Original file (20100010481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspace there over during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he arrived in and departed from Vietnam, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013577

    Original file (20080013577.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show all awards and decorations he earned as a result of his service in the Republic of Vietnam and a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for serving in the Dominican Republic. Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. With respect to a bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013501

    Original file (20090013501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a 5-point veterans' preference and award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medals for Grenada and Lebanon. He was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for his service as proof that he was there during that period but the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was not added to his DD Form 214. With respect to the Armed Forces Service Medal, there is no evidence that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011258

    Original file (20100011258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 10 December 1965 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020016

    Original file (20130020016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, the evidence of record does not show he served in Vietnam. ___________X_________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009524

    Original file (20060009524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009524 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant was subsequently separated from the service and requested that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018629

    Original file (20070018629.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the applicant’s military service in Germany, members of the Armed Forces of the United States participated in military operations throughout Europe, Asia, and South America. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) governs award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance to friendly foreign nations. The evidence of...