Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001105
Original file (20090001105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	         26 February 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20090001105 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show her bilateral knee injury was determined to have been incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her bilateral knee injury was incurred during a Joint Forces Field Training Exercise and that this disability was as a direct result of simulation of war.

3.  The applicant provides a CRSC Reconsideration Decision, dated 17 July 2007 and medical documentation in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  CRSC, as established by Section 1413a, Title 10, U.S. Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat-related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10 percent disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was 
amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10 percent disabled or who are rated at least 60 percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.

2.  On 17 July 2007, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) CRSC Branch informed the applicant that her bilateral knee condition was not a qualifying condition because it could not be determined how the disability occurred.

3.  Although evidence shows that the applicant did in fact sustain an injury to both knees, there is no evidence in the available record which shows that the injury was sustained as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. 

4.  The Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military Personnel Policy has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals.  In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have combat- related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant has stated that her bilateral knee condition was directly caused in simulation of war.  Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that her bilateral knee condition was sustained during combat action or simulation of war.  The fact that a disability was incurred in a theater of operations or during a training exercise is insufficient, in and of itself, to warrant approval of CRSC.

3.  Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship between the applicant’s VA rated disabilities and war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant her request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  __x______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001105



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001105



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017498

    Original file (20080017498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10 percent disabled or who are rated at least 60 percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001574

    Original file (20090001574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his injuries were determined to have been incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010856

    Original file (20090010856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000884C070205

    Original file (20060000884C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003280

    Original file (20120003280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her application should be considered because her injuries were incurred while she was on active duty, which was acknowledged by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and an application for CRSC was submitted in a timely manner subsequent to retirement from the U.S. Army. The applicant provides: * four VA Rating Decisions, dated 30 April 2008, 22 September 2008, 10 March 2010, and 1 June 2011 * three letters from the CRSC Branch, dated 28 September 2011, 16 November 2011, and 17 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018831

    Original file (20080018831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Specifically, the VA determined the following conditions to be service-related but there is insufficient evidence to show that they were combat-related: a. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006389C070206

    Original file (20050006389C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his nine Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for degenerative arthritis be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Even if the applicant had submitted documentation showing that he was injured in the Gulf War, he would still have to show that the injury was combat related and that it caused his nine VA rated disabilities for degenerative arthritis. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000867C070205

    Original file (20060000867C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for his knees be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016725

    Original file (20130016725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates he can swear under oath that the patches are a direct result of combat or combat related training. Although the evidence shows the applicant was diagnosed with Degenerative Arthritis of the Spine, Left Spine, Eczema, and Tendon Inflammation Left Shoulder, unfortunately there is no evidence in the available record that shows these conditions were sustained as a direct result of armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011859

    Original file (20070011859.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Evidence shows that the applicant was awarded CRSC benefits for Arthritis (Left Knee); however, the other disabilities identified by the VA were determined not to have been...