Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001015
Original file (20090001015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	   7 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001015 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting the PH for injuries that were incurred as a result of direct enemy attacks while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1971.  The applicant also states that he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 326th Engineer Battalion, 101st Airborne Division, as a heavy bulldozer operator.  In May or June 1971, he was ordered to remove a bulldozer from the trailer.  While attempting to unload the machine, the enemy had located their position and started a mortar attack on them.  In the mayhem of the attack, the bulldozer slid off the trailer sideways, hit the ground at an angle, and rolled over four times down into a canyon.  He was trapped inside the bulldozer, which had a protective cage, but he was rendered unconscious with a severe head trauma and spinal injury.  He was airlifted from the location back to the infirmary at his base camp, but to this day he has no recollection of any of the details.  He was treated and given two days of rest with no duty.  He requested to return to duty and he was returned to a new assignment.  Six years after his discharge, he would require surgery for ongoing inner ear problems.  To date, lower back problems have been a constant issue to the point of an early medical retirement from his career as a professional firefighter.  The lower back and inner ear problems surfaced the first summer 

home from his military discharge.  He knows that he must consider the possibility of the lack of documentation as medical records seem at best to be a bit on the unfocused priority.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 30 June 1970.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 62E (Crawler Tractor Operator).  The highest grade he attained was pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he 
served in the RVN from 30 April 1971 through 30 December 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of this document shows, in pertinent part, that he was assigned to HHC, 326th Engineer Battalion, (Airmobile), Vietnam.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 contains no entry showing he was awarded the PH.
 
4.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  The OMPF also does not contains any medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the Vietnam. 


5.  On 31 December 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing a total of 1 year, 6 months, and 1 day of active military service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual 
Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  The PH is not shown on his DD Form 214.

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  There was no entry pertaining to the applicant on this list of Vietnam casualties.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to the Purple Heart was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to be awarded the PH, substantiating evidence must be presented to show that the Soldier was wounded as the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's military record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  It also contains no medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the Vietnam.  

3.  Further, the applicant's name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of Vietnam battle casualties.  Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in Vietnam, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001015



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001015



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012152

    Original file (20110012152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to support his request for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005420

    Original file (20090005420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH and BSM with "V" Device are not included in the list of awards contained in item 24 and there is no indication the applicant pursued award of the PH or BSM with "V" Device at any time prior to his separation from active duty. Further, there are no medical treatment records on file that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while he was serving on active duty. Therefore, it would not be appropriate award the applicant the PH at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008505

    Original file (20120008505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is not listed on the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and there are no orders or other documents in the applicant's record that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the PH. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the PH, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004552

    Original file (20090004552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, and it contains no medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN. Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action and/or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010212

    Original file (20120010212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared during this enlistment on 2 March 1977 does not include the PH in the list of awards contained in item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016808C070206

    Original file (20050016808C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record showing that the applicant was ever wounded in action, or treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel. However, by regulation in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action while serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002117C071029

    Original file (20070002117C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he was injured during an artillery attack. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or any other documents showing the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. His record is void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012005C071029

    Original file (20060012005C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders, or other documents, indicating that the applicant was ever wounded in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Although the applicant provides photographs indicating that he received injuries to his eye and ankle while serving in the RVN, his record gives no indication that the was ever wounded as a result of enemy action, and there are no medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000573

    Original file (20120000573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of that treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The evidence of record contains no entries or documents that corroborate the applicant's claim that he was wounded as a result of enemy action while serving in the RVN. Therefore, absent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004103C070206

    Original file (20050004103C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides award recommendations for the awards in question from senior medic who served with him in the RVN. In this case, the evidence of record includes no indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured in action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound/injury. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.