Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000991
Original file (20090000991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000991 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was sentenced to serve six months in the stockade as a result of a special court-martial and while serving his sentence, he was visited by his former captain who told him he could get him out of the Army on a general discharge if he was to sign some documents.  He argues that after being incarcerated for several weeks, being 18 years old and not having the proper legal advice, he thought it were a good idea and when given his discharge papers he realized it was not a general discharge but an undesirable discharge.  The applicant concludes that he has always been ashamed of the fact that he was tricked into signing the documents which resulted in receiving an undesirable discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 December 1959 and upon completion of initial entry training was awarded military occupational specialty 111.00 (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 2 April 1960, the applicant accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failure to repair.  The punishment consisted of extra duty for two hours per day for 14 days.

4.  On 20 April 1960, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 4 April 1960 to 5 April 1960; from 
9 April 1960 to 10 April 1960; from 2100 to 2300 hrs on 13 April 1960; and for appearing in an improper uniform on 2 occasions.  The punishment consisted on forfeiture of $55.00 for 1 month.

5.  On 10 May 1960, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty and for disobeying a lawful order from his superior noncommissioned officer.  The punishment consisted of confinement at hard labor for 6 months and forfeiture of $52.00 per month for 6 months.

6.  The applicant's records include statements from his chain of command which show he was counseled on numerous occasions for unsatisfactory performance, disrupting discipline, indifferent attitude, and for being disrespectful toward superiors.

7.  The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he was in confinement from 16 May 1960 through 13 July 1960.

8.  On 27 May 1960, the applicant's unit commander initiated a recommendation to eliminate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 
635-208 (Personnel Separations) because of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature.

9.  On 6 June 1960, the applicant was notified of his pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness.  He waived his rights to a hearing before a board of officers and to submit written statements on his own behalf.  He also declined counseled.  He indicated he understood that an undesirable discharge may be issued to him and such a discharge will be under conditions other than honorable; that as a result of such discharge he might be deprived of many or all rights as a veteran under both Federal and State law; and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life.

10.  On 20 June 1960, the applicant completed a mental status evaluation and was found able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right and could participate in board proceedings.

11.  On 11 July 1960, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed issuance of an undesirable discharge.

12.  Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 14 July 1960 with a discharge under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness.  He completed 5 months and 14 days of creditable active service with 61 days of lost time.

13.  Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness.  The regulation provided for the discharge of individuals by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it had been determined that an individual's military record was characterized by one of more of the following:  frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities; sexual perversion; drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit forming narcotic drugs or marijuana; an established pattern for shirking; or an established pattern showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

15.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been carefully reviewed and found to be without merit.

2.  The applicant's record of indiscipline includes punishment under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, two court-martial convictions, 61 days of lost time. 

3.  Based on this record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  This misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, he is not entitled to either a general or an honorable discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000991





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000991



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015127

    Original file (20100015127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 1960, his immediate commander recommended his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character) by reason of unfitness. On 29 December 1960, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 by reason of unfitness and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. There is no indication he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017762

    Original file (20070017762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 February 1961, the applicant’s unit commander initiated separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. He had completed 2 years, 7 months, and 28 days of creditable active service, and had 206 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. There is no evidence of record, nor has the applicant provided sufficient evidence to support upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014390

    Original file (20080014390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, there is no evidence that indicates that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003499

    Original file (20090003499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, his service record shows he received four Article 15s and two summary courts-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014695

    Original file (20110014695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, since the applicant's diagnosis was considered to be a character and behavior disorder, it was felt that administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations, Discharge, Inaptitude or Unsuitability) was more appropriate. An intermediate commander stated separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 was not deemed appropriate and he recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011630

    Original file (20090011630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 6 June 1958. On 12 January 1961, the applicant's immediate commander recommended that the applicant be discharged from military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness) for unfitness, citing his prior misconduct. There is no indication that the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015975

    Original file (20130015975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also indicated he understood that if an undesirable discharge was issued to him that such a discharge would be under conditions other than honorable and that as a result of such a discharge he could be deprived of many or all rights as a veteran under both Federal and state laws and that he may expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations where the type of service rendered in any branch of the Armed Forces or the type of discharge received therefrom could have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015838

    Original file (20080015838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 April 1961, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant appear before a board of officers and be considered for elimination from the service in accordance with Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations) for unfitness. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 16 May 1961. The applicant’s entire record of service was considered; however, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing that his misconduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003261

    Original file (20120003261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board of Officers recommended the applicant's separation with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 24 May 1964, the separation authority approved the board's recommendation and directed the applicant's separation with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010977

    Original file (20140010977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 November 1960, the applicant's immediate commander requested the applicant be discharged from military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, paragraph 3a, for unfitness, citing the applicant's prior misconduct to include his court-martial conviction, multiple AWOL offenses, a pattern of irresponsibility, absence of respect to authority, and a bad attitude. b. Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. _______...