Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000442
Original file (20090000442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        12 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000442 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his last duty assignment as Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 32nd Artillery Regiment instead of the 30th Artillery Regiment. 

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 is in error because it shows he was assigned to the 30th Artillery Regiment instead of the 32nd Artillery Regiment.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 6 September 1968; and a copy of a letter that he wrote to his spouse, dated 21 February 1968, in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 September 1966.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64B (Heavy Truck Driver). 

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is not available for review with this case.

4.  On 12 July 1967, Headquarters, 197th Infantry Brigade, Fort Benning, GA, published Special Orders Number 151 awarding the applicant MOS 76A (Supply Specialist). 

5.  The applicant’s record does not indicate the date he arrived in the Republic of Vietnam.  However, his record contains a copy of Special Orders Number 191, issued by Headquarters, 6th Battalion, 32nd Artillery, on 21 December 1967, that released the applicant from the U.S. Army Republic of Vietnam (USARV) Transient Detachment and assigned him to Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 32nd Artillery, effective 19 December 1967. 

6.  The applicant’s record shows he was honorably released from active duty, as an overseas returnee, in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) on 6 September 1968.  Item 11 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was assigned to Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 30th Artillery, USARV.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced individual training and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time stated, in pertinent part, that item 11 shows the Soldier’s last duty assignment and major command.  For example, "Troop A, 1st Squadron, 2nd Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army Europe (USAEUR)." 







DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct unit of assignment.  

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 32nd Artillery Regiment, in the Republic of Vietnam, on 19 December 1969.  There is no evidence or indication that he was further reassigned to any other unit.  It appears that upon separation, the 30th Artillery was erroneously entered on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct unit of assignment.  

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting “Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 30th Artillery Regiment” from item 11 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 and adding “Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 32nd Artillery Regiment.”




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000442



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000442



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004216

    Original file (20150004216.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations for which he was authorized for his Vietnam service, specifically a Presidential Unit Citation and Combat Action Badge. Additionally, his records show he has qualifying service for three campaigns, although his DD Form 214 only shows one bronze service star, and he is authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000067

    Original file (20100000067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal. This publication shows that the 2nd Battalion, 35th Artillery Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited for award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 23 June 1968 - 15 January 1971 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 51, dated in 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020860

    Original file (20110020860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM for: meritorious service in support of United States objectives in the Republic of Vietnam during the period October 1966 to August 1967 while serving as a member of Headquarters and Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 29th Artillery, 4th Infantry Division. The applicant claims he should be awarded the CIB because he was an RTO in an infantry unit and was present when the unit engaged in active ground combat. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012376

    Original file (20060012376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 that was issued to him at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” (for Valor) Device, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant participated in three campaigns during his tour in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000340

    Original file (20150000340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show Company B, 4th Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he served in Battery A, 3rd Battalion, 34th Artillery Regiment, 9th Infantry Division. Item 12 of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release indicates his last duty assignment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004784

    Original file (20110004784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's SSN during his active service was "xxx-xx-8xxx"; however, his DD Form 214 was issued with an incorrect SSN of "xxx-xx-0xxx." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 3 of his DD Form 214 the entry "xxx-xx-8xxx" and replacing it with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002507

    Original file (20090002507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016739

    Original file (20110016739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM; however, neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification statement pertaining to his first award of the AGCM; therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award), for the period 8 September 1966 and 6 September 1968, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104534C070208

    Original file (2004104534C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no derogatory information and there is no documented record of a disqualification from any of the applicant’s active duty commanders that would have precluded him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002755

    Original file (20150002755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. His DD Form 214 shows this award already, depicted as the "Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...