Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000336
Original file (20090000336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000336 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states that he rose from the grade of E-1 to E-5 as a military policeman in 3 years and feels that he should have been given a second chance. The applicant states that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 6 years of honorable service and that his defense counsel was ineffective.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of this case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 June 1980.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police).  

3.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 13 January 1983 and immediately reenlisted on 14 January 1983.  He was promoted to the rank and grade of Sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 3 December 1983.

4.  On 4 November 1985, the applicant was convicted, in accordance with his pleas, by a special court-martial, of wrongful possession and use of methamphetamine.  His sentence consisted of a reduction to the grade of private (PV1)/pay grade E-1, confinement for four months, and a BCD.  The sentence was approved.  Confinement in excess of 75 days was suspended with the provision for automatic remission.

5.  On 25 March 1986, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review (USACMR) considered the applicant's appeal and found that the findings and sentence were correct in law and fact and affirmed the findings and sentence.

6.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY, General Court-Martial Order Number 14, dated 23 January 1987, directed that the bad conduct discharge be executed.

7.  On 5 March 1987, the applicant was discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, by reason of court-martial.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 20 days of creditable active service on his last enlistment.  The applicant completed a total of 6 years, 6 months, and 20 days of total active service with 60 days of lost time due to confinement.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.
10.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is acknowledged that the applicant had no other record of misconduct.  However, the evidence of record confirms that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses for which he was charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

2.  By law, the Army Board of Correction for Military Records may not disturb the finality of a court-martial.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

3.  The applicant's entire record of service was considered in this case.  However, given the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted, his MOS, and his rank at the time, it is determined that his service was not sufficiently meritorious or mitigating to warrant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000336



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000336



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007100

    Original file (20100007100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007100 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The available evidence shows the applicant committed a serious crime which rendered him triable by court-martial for an offense punishable by a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009848

    Original file (20100009848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 24 June 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, by reason of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the final discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008676

    Original file (20100008676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013675

    Original file (20140013675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The available evidence failed to establish a basis upon which clemency could be granted and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010522

    Original file (20130010522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to an honorable discharge. There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030429

    Original file (20100030429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 August 1983, upon consideration of the entire record, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and sentence as approved. A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was discharged on 22 December 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, section IV, with a bad conduct discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011602

    Original file (20100011602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011602 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant was tried and convicted by a special court-martial and sentenced to a BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009036

    Original file (20090009036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to an honorable discharge. At the time of his discharge he had completed 5 years, 10 months, and 28 days of net active service during the period of service under review. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001661

    Original file (20120001661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of the wrongful distribution of marijuana on 10 May 1983. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. He completed training, was awarded an MOS, advanced to pay grade E-3, and completed a 1-year period of service in Germany prior to being tried.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007143

    Original file (20140007143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-10, and he was given a...