Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000316
Original file (20090000316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       30 JUNE 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000316 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests payment for civilian clothing allowance in the amount of $1,163.89.

2.  The applicant states that he was entitled to civilian clothing allowance from July 1998 until his retirement on 1 October 2008, but has not received this allowance since 1 October 2004.  The applicant maintains that he discovered this error in May 2008.  Upon discovery, he states that he requested payment on three separate occasions, May, July, and September 2008.  The applicant adds that in October 2008 he was told that although he is entitled to the money for the clothing allowance, he can no longer be paid through the active duty pay system due to his retirement. 

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 4 December 2008, in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted into the Regular Army (RA) on
13 April 1988.  On 30 September 2008 he was released from active duty by reason of sufficient service for retirement and transferred to the U.S Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired).

2.  In a memorandum, subject:  Request for Civilian Clothing Allowance [Applicant], dated 4 December 2008, the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-1, United 
States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), Fort Belvoir, Virginia, stated that due to an administrative oversight, the applicant's request was not processed prior to his retirement.  He further indicated that the applicant was entitled to receive a total of $1,163.89 in clothing allowance based on the following periods: 
	
   a.  October 2004 through September 2005, $281.81;

	b.  October 2005 through September 2006, $287.45;

	c.  October 2006 through September 2007, $293.78; and

	d.  October 2007 through September 2008, $300.84.

3.  On 12 January 2009, the Chief, Case Management Division, Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), requested additional information/
documentation from the applicant in support of his claim.  Via email on              12 January 2009, the applicant was asked to provide an explanation as to why he had not applied for clothing allowance since 2004 and prior to his retirement.  Additionally, the applicant was requested to provide a copy of the paperwork he submitted to finance requesting civilian clothing allowance pay and finance's response to his requests.  

4.  On 21 January 2009, the applicant responded to the request for additional information.  The applicant stated that due to his association with his former Army unit affiliation and based on the information required on the civilian clothing allowance requests, all of his requests were classified.  He added that his unit agreed to create an unclassified memorandum to substantiate his claim.  The applicant then stated that his failure to claim his civilian clothing allowance was an administrative oversight that he did not discover until he reviewed his records shortly before his last permanent change of station in late May 2008, at which time he submitted his request.  He followed up in early August 2008 at which time additional information was required.  Having yet to receive any payment, he followed up again in October 2008 at which time he was told the finance office personnel could not make any input since he (applicant) already retired.  He was advised to submit an application to this Board for resolution.     

5.  There is no information in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that shows his unit of assignment during the period in question.  In fact, there is no information on his OMPF that verifies his military service after July 1998.  

6.  In the process of this case, a staff of the Board attempted to obtain financial information from the Special Operations Office at U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC), but no information was available.

7.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, Chapter 29, provides for Permanent Duty Civilian Clothing Allowances.  The regulation states that the Permanent Duty Civilian Clothing Allowance has two parts, the Initial Civilian Clothing Allowance and the Replacement Civilian Clothing Allowance.  The Initial Civilian Clothing Allowance is payable upon assignment to qualifying permanent duty when authorized by the Service concerned.  When entitled, the Replacement Civilian Clothing Allowance is payable annually at the end of the service member’s anniversary month using the applicable rate then in effect.  The amounts authorized by the Service concerned shall be within the maximum rates established in Table 29-8.

8.  The regulation further states that the Service may be given authority to pay the Initial Civilian Clothing Allowance and up to two Replacement Civilian Clothing Allowance payments in an up-front lump sum to members when it is projected that they will continue to meet the eligibility criteria for a Civilian Clothing Allowance on a career basis.  Such a lump-sum payment may be made only one time in a member’s career and that is when the member first becomes eligible for the allowance.  At the end of the anniversary months for the third and subsequent years of eligibility, the member will be paid the Replacement Civilian Clothing Allowance.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The Chief, ABCMR Case Management Division, requested that the applicant provide additional information, such as his request to finance and their response to him concerning his claim for civilian clothing allowance for the period 2004 through 2008.  However, the applicant failed to provide this documentation citing that the information was deemed classified.  

2.  Nevertheless, the Assistant Chief of Staff, INSCOM provided a memorandum substantiating the applicant's entitlement to civilian clothing allowance, the period of the entitlement, and the amount.  Therefore, based on the evidence provided and provided an audit of the applicant's records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirm that the civilian clothing allowance for the periods in question has not already been paid, it would be appropriate to grant the applicant's requested relief.  



BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is entitled to receive a total of $1,163.89 in clothing allowance for the following periods (after first auditing his DFAS records to ensure the clothing allowance for these periods has not ready been paid):  

   a.  October 2004 through September 2005, $281.81;

	b.  October 2005 through September 2006, $287.45;

	c.  October 2006 through September 2007, $293.78; and

	d.  October 2007 through September 2008, $300.84.




      ___________XXX____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000316



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000316



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010279

    Original file (20140010279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he did not receive any special pay for this time period but continued to work as an active duty dentist at Fort Knox until his medical retirement on 20 June 2014. There is no record of a prepared, executed, approved, processed, or paid HPOIP contract at $20,000/year payable $1,666.66/month effective for any period after 20130610. c. Since he was scheduled for release from active duty on 20131210, he was ineligible for the Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) HPOIP contract which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003085

    Original file (20130003085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter from DFAS shows $80.69 was paid in premiums each month in 2000. b. DFAS states the additional money her husband was paying was due to the buy-in premiums or "Open Season" cost. However, only the spouse SBP premiums are refundable through Public Law 92-425. c. Public Law 105-261 states all SBP premiums will be terminated effective 1 October 2008 for all members who are at least 70 years old and have paid SBP premiums for 360 or more months.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050004916

    Original file (20050004916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis J. Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The applicant provides no evidence to show her and the FSM were improperly briefed when he enrolled in the SBP during the 1981 through 1982 Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010014

    Original file (20080010014.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant has failed to submit evidence showing that he executed an ISP agreement in a timely manner. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was authorized to submit an agreement for ISP for the years in question. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he submitted his ISP agreements in a timely manner and auditing his military pay account and paying him any monies owed as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017525

    Original file (20100017525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 8 September 2006 * the requirements of his contract required him to complete basic combat training, Officer Candidate School, Basic Officer Leadership Course II, and Military Intelligence Basic Officer Leadership Course III (MI BOLC III) * the Selected Reserve Officer Accession Incentive Program, Accession Bonus Addendum states "I shall receive a bonus of $10000 paid in one lump sum upon my successful completion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015263

    Original file (20070015263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 7d of the applicant's DA Form 597-3 states, "I understand and agree that if I am disenrolled from the ROTC program or if I fail to accept a commission, if offered, the Secretary of the Army or his designate may order me to active duty as an enlisted Soldier for a period of not more than four years or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, may require me to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money plus interest, equal to the entire amount of financial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025088

    Original file (20110025088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * payment of back retired pay of about $474,093.88 plus interest from 1980 to the present * removal of the DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty) from his records * removal of any documentation related to his death from his pay records * determination of why the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) stopped his retired pay without notice * determination of why DFAS officials stopped working his claim and using the excuse that his issue was being handled...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024989

    Original file (20100024989.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024989 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he deposited $600.00 in his Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) account. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. changing the DD Form 1131, dated 28 February 2005, to show the applicant made...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212

    Original file (2003090619C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002741

    Original file (20080002741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This agreement stated that in connection with his affiliation with the USAR under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP), he would receive a lump sum bonus of $10,000 upon his assignment to the designated position, unit, or pay grade pursuant to the written agreement. He stated that at the time of his affiliation with the USAR, the applicant's SSI was not authorized a bonus. The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered into an Officer Affiliation Bonus Written Agreement...