Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000028
Original file (20090000028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       23 APRIL 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090000028 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that his left arm nerves were severed during a fire fight in Iraq in 2003 and that he submitted a request for the Purple Heat in 2004 and was told he would be awarded it but never received it.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter, dated 15 December 2008, from the National Personnel Records Center in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army fort a period of 3 years on 7 May 1997.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  His records also show he executed a 5-year reenlistment in the Regular Army on 8 May 1999.  The applicant's records show he served in Iraq from 2 March to 21 May 2003.

3.  The applicant was honorably discharged due to a "physical condition, not a disability" with entitlement to severance pay in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 21 November 2003.

4.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal (4th Award), the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Expert Infantryman Badge, and the Air Assault Badge. 

5.  The applicant's records do not contain permanent orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant's medical records are not available for review with this case.  However, his separation packet indicates he was separated based on a diagnosis of "anxiety disorder and depressive disorder, not otherwise specified." 

7.  An email, dated 9 April 2009, from the Deputy Chief, Army Casualty and Mortuary Branch, Human Resources Command, Alexandria, VA, indicated that there was no casualty report recorded for the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  This regulation also states, in pertinent part, that when contemplating an award of the Purple Heart, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not the sole justification for award.  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The decision whether to award an individual the Purple Heart is made by the commander having award approval authority after ensuring that the individual met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds.  

2.  In the absence of documentation, such as a completed, authenticated, and verified casualty report, or other evidence which clearly shows the applicant suffered a wound or injury as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for this wound or injury, and that his treatment was made a matter of official records, there is insufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart in this case. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   ___XXX____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000028



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090000028



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015087

    Original file (20080015087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained 28 September 1970 while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 28 September 1970; b. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; c. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007679

    Original file (20080007679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 9 February 2005; his sworn statement, dated 16 February 2005; a DA Form 1156 (Casualty Feeder Report), dated 8 June 2003; orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge and Army Commendation Medal; a narrative for the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device; discharge orders, dated 9 May 2005; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a deployment memorandum; a DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record), dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010664

    Original file (20100010664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Among other awards, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 shows "Purple Heart" and lists the authority as Army Regulation 672-5-1 instead of the general orders number and the Headquarters that awarded the Purple Heart. It shows his name and lists his service number as US56XXXXXXX. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official orders awarding him the Purple Heart or additional corroborating evidence that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025791

    Original file (20100025791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service medical records do not show he was wounded in combat and/or treated for any combat wounds. In this case, there is no evidence in the applicant's records and he did not provide any evidence that he was wounded or injured in action. With respect to the Combat Infantryman Badge, there are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001966

    Original file (20090001966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An email, dated 27 April 2009, from the Army Casualty and Mortuary Branch, Human Resources Command, Alexandria, VA, indicated that there was no casualty report for an injury or wound as a result of enemy action recorded for the applicant. There is no evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of the alleged anti-tank mine explosion on 9 August 2006 or that he was treated for such injury. In the absence of a completed, authenticated, and verified casualty report, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022259

    Original file (20100022259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010909

    Original file (20120010909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is authorized the Purple Heart. While the applicant's record does show that he was evacuated from Vietnam to Japan as a patient, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence, showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004145

    Original file (20130004145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he received in Vietnam; however, this award is not shown on his DD Form 214. There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 January 1967 through 29 July 1968 * adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023516

    Original file (20100023516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His contemporaneous DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following entries: * item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was transferred from Vietnam on 14 February 1968 to the 106th General Hospital, Japan in a patient status; however, the nature of his injury/illness is undetermined * item 40 (Wounds) does not list any combat injuries * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list the Purple Heart 7. His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089754C070403

    Original file (2003089754C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error, which does not require action by the Board. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested.