Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080018068
Original file (AR20080018068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      5 MARCH 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018068 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted an extension on the time he was authorized to make his final move upon retirement.  

2.  The applicant states that he was not told he had to request an extension of transportation entitlements prior to the expiration of his entitlements 1 year after he retired.  He states that he took a job teaching the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps in Van Buren, Arkansas, and was unable to sell his home prior to September 2008.  He states as soon as he sold his home he contacted the transportation office at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, and requested an extension of his entitlements but his request was denied.  He states he feels he did everything correctly and that he should not be penalized for not receiving the correct information during his retirement outprocessing.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the disapproval of his request for reinstatement and extension of transportation entitlements.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis Orders C-05-690886, dated 11 May 2006, authorized the applicant's release from active duty for retirement on 31 July 2006 and his placement on the Retired List on 1 August 2006.  These orders also authorized him up to 1 year to complete selection of a home and to complete travel in connection with his retirement.

2.  On 31 July 2006, the applicant was honorably released from active duty for the purpose of retirement in the rank of master sergeant (E-8) and on 1 August 2006, he was placed on the Retired List.

3.  In an electronic mail message, dated October 2008, a member of the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, disapproved the applicant's extension of his travel and transportation shipping entitlement, as the applicant let his travel and transportation entitlement expire on 1 August 2007.  This electronic mail message also stated, in pertinent part, that their office did not have the authority to retroactively reinstate an expired entitlement and essentially recommended that the applicant apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.

4.  Volume 1 (Uniformed Service Personnel) of the JFTR contains basic statutory regulations concerning official travel and transportation of members of the Uniformed Services.  Paragraphs U5130, U5230, and U5365-F contain the policy and procedure pertaining to the shipment of household goods (HHG) to a home of selection (HOS) by uniformed service personnel upon retirement.  In effect, these paragraphs authorize a member travel and transportation allowances to an HOS by the member from his last permanent duty station (PDS) upon retirement.  They state, in pertinent part, that a member on active duty is entitled to travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS upon retirement.  They also establish time limitations for shipment of HHG and state, in pertinent part, that travel must be completed within 1 year from the active service termination date.

5.  Extension provisions to the 1-year time limit are also provided for deserving cases under the Secretarial Process.  This process allows for extensions based on an unexpected event beyond the member's control that prevents movement to an HOS within the specified time limit.  An extension of the time limit may be authorized by the Secretarial Process if it is in the best interest of the service or substantially to the benefit of the member and not costly or otherwise adverse to the service.  These extensions are approved for the specific period of time that the member anticipates is needed to complete the move, and if additional time is required, the member may request a further extension.  Paragraph U5012-I of Volume 1 of the JFTR provides the policy on restrictions to time limit extensions and states, in pertinent part, that a written time limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the extension may be approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial Process.  However, extensions under this process will not be authorized if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the separation/retirement date.  These JFTR provisions and time limitations for the shipment of HHG were also in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for reinstatement and an extension of his retirement transportation entitlements was carefully considered.

2.  The JFTR does indicate that retirement transportation and travel entitlements will be used within 1 year of retirement; however, it also provides for extensions of this entitlement in 1-year increments up to 5 additional years, or a total of 6 years.  While it is clear that the applicant failed to submit a request for extension in a timely manner, it is presumed that had the applicant filed his extension request on time, it would have been granted.

3.  It is clear that the only reason for denying the applicant's extension request was his failure to submit the request in a timely manner.  Although the applicant failed to timely file a request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlements, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct his record to show he was granted the necessary 1-year extensions of his earned and authorized retirement travel and transportation entitlement through 1 August 2009 in order to allow his move to a designated retirement location at Government expense.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was granted the necessary 1-year extensions through 1 August 2009 of his earned and authorized retirement travel and transportation entitlement in order to allow his move to a designated retirement location at Government expense and by reimbursing him the authorized amount if his move has already been accomplished at his own expense.  If the move has not been accomplished, the applicant is cautioned that he must submit future extension requests (i.e., another 1-year extension for the period ending 1 August 2009 and separate requests for the periods ending in 2010 through 2012 through normal transportation office channels and are subject to government approval.   It is recommended that he submit future extension requests not later than 60 days before his entitlement is to expire (i.e., not later than 1 June 2009, and 1 June 2010, etc.).



      __________XXX_______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018068



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018068



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017718

    Original file (20080017718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested an extension of entitlement to ship his household goods. It appears the applicant submitted a request for an extension of his travel and shipping entitlement in September 2008, 2 years subsequent to his retirement date. Although the applicant failed to timely file a request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlements, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003397

    Original file (20120003397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * retirement orders, dated 11 December 2007 * recall to active duty orders, dated 15 May 2008 * request for extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements * letter from U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, Redstone Arsenal, AL, dated 21 January 2009 * a letter from the Transportation Office, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, dated 3 January 2012 * request for further extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006506

    Original file (20080006506.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter to the Senator's office further reads that the applicant's orders erroneously authorized the transportation of HHG to an HOS instead of his HOR or place of entry on active duty and that the transportation office incorrectly advised the applicant that the time limit was 1 year. The Senator's office was informed by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, that if requested by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, they will support the applicant's request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015263

    Original file (20110015263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The transportation office explained that she had two years to complete her final move, but she would need to request an extension after one year. Notwithstanding the Department of the Army G-4's email message that extension is not authorized, it seems appropriate to show the applicant's request for extension and reinstatement of her HHG shipment entitlements was approved through 30 September 2012 (4 years after her retirement). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007095

    Original file (20120007095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she timely requested an extension of her entitlement to ship her household goods (HHG) to her home of selection (HOS). Travel and transportation entitlements expire 6 years from the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she timely requested extension of her travel and transportation entitlements on 30 April 2010 that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000037

    Original file (20150000037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he timely requested an extension of his entitlement to ship his household goods (HHG) to his home of selection (HOS). The JFTR, paragraph U5365, states a member is required to contact a Transportation Office for an extension prior to the 1st anniversary date of his or her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he timely requested and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013323

    Original file (20110013323.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement; an HHG extension request and approval recommendation of local command; a Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, denial of the extension request; and a doctor's letter. He also stated the applicant's orders clearly stated he had 1 year to select a home and complete his travel in connection with his retirement and local transportation retirement briefings provided the opportunity to ask questions. As a result, it would be appropriate and serve the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011849

    Original file (20100011849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They state, in pertinent part, that a member on active duty is entitled to travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS upon retirement. The applicant's request for reinstatement and an extension of his retirement transportation entitlements was carefully considered. Although the applicant failed to timely file a request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlements, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008389

    Original file (20130008389.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    These extensions are approved for the specific period of time the member anticipates is needed to complete the move and the member may request a further extension if additional time is required. Therefore, given that he has explained the circumstances that led to his failure to submit extension requests in a timely manner, it would be equitable to correct his records to show his request for extension and reinstatement of his retirement transportation entitlement was approved through 17 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017414C071029

    Original file (20060017414C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 30 June 2006, the applicant requested a reinstatement and extension of his retirement transportation entitlement and shipment of his household goods (HHG) through 31 December 2006. He stated the reason for the extension request was that his family had not yet made a selection of new home and had not yet used their last move transportation entitlement authorized by his retirement. These extensions are approved for the specific period of time that the member anticipates is needed to...