Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020091
Original file (20080020091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080020091 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings) be corrected to show that his retirement was based on an injury or disability resulting from an injury or disease received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty during a period of war as defined by law and that his disability did result from a combat related injury.

2.  The applicant states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Board determined that his degenerative disc disease/arthritis of his spine and his degenerative arthritis of his knees were combat-related.

3.  The applicant provides the CRSC rating decision and his DA Form 199 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Combat-Related Special Compensation, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat-related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.  Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.  Eligible members are those retirees who have 20  years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 
10-percent disabled or who are rated at least 60-percent disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.

3.  Records show the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency CRSC Branch granted the applicant’s request CRSC benefits for numerous medical conditions.  Specifically, the applicant was granted benefits for Traumatic Arthritis C Spine and the justification shows "Parachuting injury or airborne operations verified in VA decision and/or medical records."  The applicant was also granted benefits for a knee condition and the justification was shown as "Parachuting injury or airborne operations verified in VA decision and/or medical records."

4.  The applicant's DA Form 199, which was prepared on 11 January 1980 shows that the applicant's spine and knee medical conditions were caused while in the line of duty during a time of war or National emergency.  However, this form does not show that they were incurred as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty during a period of war as defined by law

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  Evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded CRSC benefits for numerous medical conditions.  However, he did not provide nor is there sufficient evidence to show that the arthritis conditions to his back and knees were incurred as a result of direct combat.

2.  The applicant was awarded the CRSC benefits for these conditions because the CRSC Board determined that the applicant's conditions were incurred during a simulation of war and that the evidence did not support that they occurred as a result of direct combat.   

3.  Furthermore, the DA Form 199 in question was prepared on 11 January 1980 and the CRSC benefit program was not established until almost 20 years after the fact.  It would not be appropriate to apply the current CRSC rules to the disability processing system that was in place in 1980.  The applicant has not shown that the DA Form 199 was not accurate or unjust at the time of preparation.  As a result, it would not be in the interest of justice to amend the DA Form 199 as requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020091



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020091



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016669

    Original file (20120016669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) under Items 10a to 10c to show his right hip injury as a disability that was incurred in the line of duty (LOD) as a result of an instrumentality of war. The regulation states in: a. Paragraph 4-19(2)(b) states in block 10C the board will record its determination of whether the injury was combat-related as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. b. Paragraph 4-19j that in making a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016319

    Original file (20120016319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show: * his back injury was combat-related * he received a 30 percent permanent disability rating 2. The applicant states: * his back injury originally occurred during a training exercise in conditions simulating war in 1997 and it is documented in his Line of Duty (LOD) paperwork * his 2004 injury occurred while loading a tactical truck with equipment (all instrumentalities of war) in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003688

    Original file (20150003688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was asked to provide evidence on how these conditions occurred, such as a line of duty investigation, medical documentation, and/or VA rating decision: * VASRD Code 5009, Arthritis, left knee, No evidence in his claim to show that a combat-related event caused this condition * VASRD Code 5099, Bone Condition, right knee, No evidence in his claim to show that a combat-related event caused this condition * VASRD Code 5201, Limited motion of arm, right shoulder, No evidence in his claim to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021178

    Original file (20090021178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Disabilities that were incurred while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct causal relationship of the applicant’s disabilities to war or the simulation of war there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010463

    Original file (20140010463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * denial letter from HRC, dated 24 March 2014 * webpage from Military.Com explaining CRSC * printout showing eligibility requirements for CRSC * DD Form 2860 Test (Application for CRSC), dated 10 June 2014 * two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Order removing him from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and permanently retiring him * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) * service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003774

    Original file (20130003774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * a self-authored statement, dated 13 February 2013 * his DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), convened on 2 March 2010 * his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 8 December 2011 * a letter from U.S. Army human Resources Command (HRC) CRSC Branch, dated 13 December 2012 * two letters of support, dated 12 July and 27 August 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015133

    Original file (20110015133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service and/or VA medical records are not available for review with this case. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. The applicant has submitted evidence to show that his PTSD and foot injuries were service related.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024695

    Original file (20110024695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His record should show a combat-related service condition for his knee disability * His knee injury occurred in 1968 during a simulated war exercise * His knee came into contact with his weapon while climbing into a foxhole during night live-fire exercises * He has met 3 out of 4 for combat-related special compensation * His record only shows service-connected injury * He was injured while in the Army but he retired from the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR) * He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014768

    Original file (20120014768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 March 2012, a TDRL PEB convened and found his condition continued since being placed on the TDRL. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018589

    Original file (20120018589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * Progress Notes * three letters from the CRSC Branch * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 November 2011, the HRC CRSC Branch informed the applicant that they were unable to overturn the previous adjudications because the documents he submitted still showed no new evidence to link his requested conditions to a combat-related event and he was advised to...