Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020031
Original file (20080020031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       5 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080020031 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her reentry eligibility (RE) code from 
RE-4 to RE-3.  In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment.

2.  The applicant states she needs to have her RE code changed to be able to enlist.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant entered active duty in the Regular Army on 25 January 2007, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 63B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic).

2.  On 27 December 2007, the applicant was given a direct order by her unit commander not to drink, purchase, or have purchased for her, any alcoholic beverages in any form including cough medicines containing alcohol, or to purchase any aerosol product for the purpose of getting a quick high.

3.  The applicant was referred to the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) on 2 January 2008.  She was placed in the outpatient treatment Track II program.  During her enrollment, she participated in one group session and three aftercare sessions.  Her motivation was described as poor.

4.  On 19 January 2008 the applicant was found to be inhaling compressed air (Dust Off) for the purpose of getting a quick high.

5.  On 21 January 2008, the applicant was involved in an alcohol-related incident wherein she was drinking to the point of severe intoxication with another Soldier, both of whom were so intoxicated as to necessitate emergency transportation to a medical facility.

6.  On 24 January 2008, an ASAP Clinical Rehabilitation Program Participation Agreement was prepared, wherein the applicant agreed to abstain from the use of any alcohol or other mind and mood altering substances.

7.  On 7 February 2008, during a Rehabilitation Team Meeting, it was reported that the applicant continued to drink in violation of the conditions of her enrollment in ASAP.  She was declared an alcohol rehabilitation failure.  She was recommended for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 9.

8.  A statement, dated 6 March 2008, reported that during a room inspection, the applicant was found to be intoxicated to the point she could barely speak or hold a conversation.  Two empty and one almost empty alcohol bottles (Jack Daniel's whiskey) were found in her room.

9.  A MEDCOM Form 699-R (Mental Status Evaluation), signed 13 March 2008, notes that the applicant was being evaluated for an adjustment disorder, alcohol abuse, and inhalant abuse.  She was motivated to continue care for her emotional issues but she did not desire intensive alcohol rehabilitation.

10.  On 31 March 2008, the applicant's unit commander notified the applicant that he was recommending she be discharged as an alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure.

11.  On 15 April 2008, after consulting with counsel, the applicant acknowledged the separation recommendation.  She acknowledged her rights to counsel and that she could receive a general discharge which could result in the loss of some State and Federal benefits.  She also acknowledged that she would be ineligible to apply for reenlistment for a period of 2 years.

12.  The discharge authority approved the separation recommendation and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, as an ASAP failure.  She was to be discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
13.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 17 May 2008 with 1 year, 3 months, and 23 days of creditable service.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) lists her reason for separation as under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure with a separation program designator (SPD) of JPD and an RE code of 4.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to the Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention and Control Program or ASAP for alcohol or other drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.

15.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states that Soldiers separated for alcohol rehabilitation failure will be given an SPD of JPD.

16.  The SPD/RE Codes Cross Reference Table, dated 15 June 2006, states that an SPD of JPD requires an RE code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states she needs to have her RE code changed to be able to enlist.

2.  The applicant does not indicate that the reason for her separation was improper or unjust.  Further, at the time the MEDCOM Form 699-R was prepared she indicated that she was motivated to continue care for her emotional issues but she did not desire intensive alcohol rehabilitation.

3.  The applicant has not asked for and there is no apparent reason to change the narrative reason for her separation.

4.  An RE code is driven by the SPD code which, in turn, is linked to the narrative reason for separation.

5.  The applicant was separated as an alcohol and inhalant abuse rehabilitation failure.  She was separated and properly assigned a reentry code in accordance with regulations of an SPD code of JPD and an RE code of 4.
6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X  __  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020031



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080020031



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018997

    Original file (20090018997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He consumed alcohol on 24 December 2008. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals are assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008998

    Original file (AR20130008998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a VA rating decision, dated 7 March 2012; DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award, dated 11 October 2009, indicated she was approved for an ARCOM; and her battalion commander’s recommendation for an honorable discharge, dated 17 November 2010. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001122

    Original file (AR20130001122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 October 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 7th U.S. Army Joint Multinational Training Command, Vilseck, Germany f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 22 June 2007, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 3 months, 15 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 8 months, 17 days i. On 10 August 2010, the unit commander notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013312

    Original file (20090013312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that her narrative reason for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 9 (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure) be changed. The regulation shows that the SPD code "JPD" as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as "alcohol rehabilitation failure" and that the authority for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008196

    Original file (20110008196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 2. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Her records show she was discharged for rehabilitation failure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018924

    Original file (20090018924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 2 September 1999. On 21 January 2005, the applicant was discharged with an honorable characterization of service under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200, alcohol rehabilitation failure after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 11 days of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012781

    Original file (20100012781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 July 2009, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge of the applicant under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that he be furnished an General Discharge Certificate. Pertinent Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006683

    Original file (20140006683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After numerous discussions with behavioral health providers and Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) counselors, it was concluded that there was no other care available on active duty for her situation. On 7 December 2012, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that she be discharged under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 with an honorable discharge. Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010947

    Original file (20100010947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commanded cited his reason as the applicant's ASAP failure with a subsequent DUI and the NJP for failing to report. His DD Form 214 shows he received a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 9-2, as an alcohol rehabilitation failure with a separation program designator (SPD) of JPD and an RE code of 4. It states that the SPD code of JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001726

    Original file (20140001726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of JPD was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 9, for...