Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019880
Original file (20080019880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019880 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Honorable Discharge papers be corrected to show the rank of first lieutenant as opposed to the rank of second lieutenant currently shown.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was released in the rank of first lieutenant. This is an obvious clerical error as orders confirm his rank at the time of his release.

3.  In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his discharge orders from his enlisted status to accept an appointment as a commissioned officer, his honorable discharge certificate from his officer status, and a copy of one of his reassignment orders showing his rank as first lieutenant.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The evidence shows the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army as a first lieutenant from his former enlisted status on 8 January 1977.

3.  A copy of Headquarters, First United States Army letter, Subject:  Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army Under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 591 and 593, dated 10 December 1976; and a copy of the corresponding DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) are on file in the applicant's service personnel record.  These documents show the applicant was appointed a commissioned officer in the rank of first lieutenant.

4.  Orders 233-1, prepared by Headquarters, First United States Army, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, dated 28 November 1977 show the applicant was released from assignment to the 330th General Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, with an effective date of 29 November 1977 and assigned to the US Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement), St. Louis, Missouri, due to conflicts he was experiencing between his Reserve service and his employment.  The rank shown in the standard name line of these orders is first lieutenant.

5.  On 23 August 1978, the Office of The Adjutant General, Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, published AGUZ-PAD-R (N2) Orders 08-1080898 honorably discharging the applicant, effective 31 August 1978.  The rank shown in the standard name line is second lieutenant.

6.  On 31 August 1978, a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) was prepared for the applicant.  The applicant is identified as a second lieutenant on the discharge certificate.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army.  Entries on the appropriate discharge certificate will be typed in capital letters followed by the social security number, grade [rank], and career branch.






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the rank shown on his discharge certificate should read first lieutenant as opposed to the now shown second lieutenant.  The applicant's contention has merit.

2.  The evidence shows that the applicant was appointed a commissioned officer in the rank of first lieutenant from his former enlisted status on 8 January 1977.  There is no evidence the applicant ever served in the rank of second lieutenant.  The applicant was reassigned from his unit to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to conflicts he was experiencing between his Reserve service and his employment and he was subsequently discharged from the Reserve on 31 August 1978.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has submitted and his service personnel records contain evidence that satisfies this requirement.  He is therefore entitled to a correction of his honorable discharge papers to show he was honorably discharged in the rank of first lieutenant.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  amending Office of The Adjutant General, Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center Orders 08-1080898 to show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR, effective 31 August 1978, in the rank of first lieutenant; and

   b.  providing to the applicant an appropriate document to replace the DD Form 256A to show he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of first lieutenant.



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019880



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019880



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068447C070402

    Original file (2002068447C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The retirement grade of major shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). The retirement orders submitted by the applicant supporting his contention that he was promoted to the grade of major, dated 2 May 1978, show his highest grade held on active duty was captain, not major.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003260C070206

    Original file (20050003260C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    An advisory opinion was requested from the Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG). The Army had the benefit of the applicant's 12 years of prior nursing experience from the time he was appointed and took his oath of office on 2 July 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he was awarded 3 years of constructive service credit upon his appointment in the USAR which made him eligible for appointment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002476

    Original file (20140002476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her service as a Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadet be credited for retirement pay purposes. She respectfully requests this information be favorably considered even after the extended length of time and her service record (DD Form 214) be corrected to accurately reflect her Reserve service from 7 September 1976 through 22 December 1978. DOD Financial Management Regulations show the above time is not creditable service; therefore, she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012721

    Original file (20080012721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 September 1968 and was honorably separated from active duty as a CPL on 25 April 1970. Upon completion of his military service obligation on 16 September 1974, he was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of SP4. However, there is no evidence to show he served as a CPL and, in September 1977, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016539

    Original file (20140016539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. correction of the separation date shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was retained on active duty through 31 August 1978; and b. correction of his DD Form 214 or DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his release from active duty (REFRAD) and discharge resulted from service-connected disabilities. There is no evidence that definitively shows the applicant was retained on continuous active duty for a period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208

    Original file (2004102698C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03092048C070212

    Original file (03092048C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: He was discharged from the Guard on 14 June 1974 in order to accept an appointment in the Ohio Army National Guard. The applicant's chronological statement of retirement points that he submits with his request shows that he was a member of the USAR from 2 April 1977 without a break in service through 1 April 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013210

    Original file (20140013210.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier request for correction of the following documents to show her rank and grade as major (MAJ)/O-4 instead of captain (CPT)/O-3: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 November 1982 * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 6 October 1994 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 6 October 1994 * USAR Personnel Center (DARP) Form 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018366

    Original file (20130018366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: a. she served as a Regular Army (RA) officer from May 1977 – November 1982, at which time she was honorably discharged in the rank of CPT; b. she served in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) with the 168th Support Group from November 1982 to November 1990, during which time she was promoted to MAJ in 1989; c. following her service with the 168th Support Group, she served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010525C070208

    Original file (20040010525C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) from the Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC), Infantry (IN) Branch, as a second lieutenant effective 12 May 1969, with an educational delay to obtain a bachelor's degree. The applicant submits a copy of his MRD Computation Sheet that indicates his date of initial appointment as 12 May 1969; total break in service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days; authorized service time as 28 years; date...