Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019775
Original file (20080019775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  26 March 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019775 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served overseas in Europe and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for a total of 26 months and not 17 months as indicated on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a chronological outline of his service and his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 8 November 1965.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 36H (Dial Central Officer Repairman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) confirms he served in Europe for 1 year, 5 months, and 2 days from 22 June 1966 through 23 November 1967 and in the RVN for 8 months and 6 days from 20 January 
1968 through 25 September 1968.

4.  On 27 September 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of specialist five after completing 2 years, 10 months, and 20 days of active duty service.  Item 22c of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 4 months, and 9 days of overseas service.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The instructions contained in the version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's REFRAD stated, in pertinent part, to enter all overseas service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214, as documented on the DA Form 20, in item 22c.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that all of his overseas service is not reflected in item 22c of his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and found to have merit.  The governing regulation, in effect at the time of his REFRAD, provided for entering the total of all overseas service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 in item 22c.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served in Europe for 1 year, 5 months, and 2 days between 22 June 1966 and 23 November 1967 and that he served in the RVN for 8 months and 6 days between 20 January 1968 and 25 September 1968, as evidenced by entries on his DA Form 20.  Therefore, it is clear the current entry in item 22c of his DD Form 214 does not document all of his overseas service.  As a result, it would be appropriate to correct this entry to reflect the 2 years, 1 month, and 8 days of overseas service he completed during the period of active duty service covered by the DD Form 214.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to reflect he completed a total of 2 years, 1 month, and 8 days of overseas service and by providing him a correction to his DD Form 214 that reflects this change.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains correcting item 22c of his DD Form 214 to reflect he completed a total of 26 months of overseas service.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019775



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019775



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011172

    Original file (20090011172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he had service in Vietnam. The regulation in effect at the time stated, in pertinent part, that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater (e.g., USAREUR for U.S. Army Europe) in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c. The applicant contends that item 22c of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003087

    Original file (20110003087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 and military record does not contain any evidence to show he ever served in Europe. It states that the following will be entered in the items indicated: a. item 22c include the total active duty service outside the continental limits for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008732C071029

    Original file (20060008732C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also includes orders confirming he was awarded the BSM and ARCOM for meritorious service while serving on active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged errors now under consideration on 31 December 1968; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 30 December 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003419

    Original file (20110003419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. In this instance, the "presumption of regularity" is based on Army Regulation 635-5, chapter 2 which prescribed the instructions for entering the Soldier's foreign service in item 22c of the DD Form 214. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003597

    Original file (20090003597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed a total of 3 years, 9 months, and 29 days of active duty service from 23 February 1966 through 4 December 1969, as reflected in item 22a(1) of his DD Form 214. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 22b to reflect this total period of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011799

    Original file (20090011799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c the entry "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USARPAC-RVN)"; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023996

    Original file (20100023996.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010826

    Original file (20080010826.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12f (Foreign Service) of his final 31 May 1997 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of the DD Form 214 issued to him at that time shows he completed 1 year and 1 day of overseas service during the period covered by the separation document (29 January 1968-30 June 1972), and Item 30 (Remarks) contains an entry confirming he served in the RVN from 1 June 1969 through 31 May 1970. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023902

    Original file (20110023902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. There is no order or other available evidence that shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006648

    Original file (20110006648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show his RVN period of service.