Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019647
Original file (20080019647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        27 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019647 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a Certificate of Achievement for Meritorious Service be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he was recommended for the "award" by his company commander, but he never received it.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  a copy of a Recommendation for Award memorandum, dated 2 February 1967, for the U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Certificate of Achievement and

	b.  a copy of a letter of commendation with endorsement, dated 3 January 1967.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years on 13 April 1965.  Following basic combat training at Fort Knox, KY, he was transferred to Fort Gordon, GA, for advanced individual training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police).

3.  The applicant was awarded MOS 95B on or about 5 November 1965 and transferred to Fort Devens, MA.  He served at Fort Devens until on or about 28 April 1966 when he received orders to Vietnam.

4.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on or about 18 May 1966 and was assigned to Company C, 716th Military Police Battalion with duty as a Military Policeman.  He departed Vietnam on or about 2 April 1967.

5.  The applicant’s record shows he was selected as the outstanding Soldier of Company C, 716th Military Police Battalion; the outstanding Soldier of the 716th Military Police Battalion; and he received a letter of commendation for his actions in the investigation of the fatal shooting of a Danish citizen in Saigon.

6.  On 2 February 1967, the commanding officer of Company C, 716th Military Police Battalion, recommended the applicant for the USARV Certificate of Achievement for his outstanding duty performance as a patrolman and static security guard in the Saigon-Cholon metropolitan area.  The applicant’s record does not contain a copy of the Certificate of Achievement and it cannot be determined if the recommendation was approved.

7.  USARV Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards), then in effect, provided that the USARV Certificate of Achievement was awarded to military personnel serving in USARV in recognition of meritorious service, acts, or achievements which do not meet the standards for a U.S. Army decoration (e.g., Distinguished Service Medal, Legion of Merit, Bronze Star Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, or Army Commendation Medal).  It was considered appropriate for award to deserving personnel not otherwise recognized immediately prior to their departure from the Republic of Vietnam as a reward for loyal and efficient service as a member of the command.  The USARV Certificate of Achievement was not to be given in addition to any other award for the same period of meritorious service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It provided, in pertinent part, that item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) would list awards and decorations received during the period of active duty.  Certificates were not included in item 24.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests a USARV Certificate of Achievement be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  Although the applicant has shown he was recommended for the USARV Certificate of Achievement, there is no proof it was ever approved.  Even if it had been approved, Army Regulation 635-5 did not provide for its inclusion on the DD Form 214.

3.  From the applicant’s record, it is obvious that he provided outstanding service as a Military Policeman during his almost 2 years of inducted service.  During that time he was selected as the outstanding Soldier of Company C, 716th Military Police Battalion; outstanding Soldier of the 716th Military Police Battalion; and he received a letter of commendation for his actions in the investigation the fatal shooting of a Danish citizen in Saigon.  Therefore, wants the applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX_________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019647



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019647



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060162C070421

    Original file (2001060162C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record clearly establishes the applicant’s entitlement to the MUC based on his assignment tenure and service with the 716 th Military Police Battalion in the RVN. However, the record also confirms that applicant’s unit was awarded the Navy Unit Commendation for a period of service prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101622C070208

    Original file (2004101622C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be amended to show he attended dog handler's training and that he is authorized to wear the Navy Unit Commendation (NUC) and two bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal. In pertinent part, it states that a soldier may wear a unit award permanently if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017887

    Original file (20080017887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows the applicant served as a military policeman during his assignment in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015738

    Original file (20110015738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008736

    Original file (20110008736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 16 August 1967 to 15 August 1968 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with the 527th MP Company from 19 August 1967 to 6 August 1968 * item 38 he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings 4. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020553

    Original file (20130020553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision promulgated in Docket Number AR20120012588, dated 17 January 2013, wherein he requested correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant states: * he is requesting the Board's assistance in correcting his records to show he was awarded the ARCOM - his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013621

    Original file (20080013621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. In the absence of evidence that the applicant actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005955

    Original file (20080005955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's several DA Forms 20 do not show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018818

    Original file (20070018818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Army Good Conduct Medal. The applicant's military personnel records show he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018225

    Original file (20070018225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Standard Forms (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 16 August 1967 and 14 April 1970. j. SF 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 16 August 1967 and 19 April 1970. k. Two DA Forms 2658 (Health Record-Abstract of Service), dated in November 1967. l. DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status or Release from Active Service), dated 9 April 1970. m. SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 9 December 1968. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does...