Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019600
Original file (20080019600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE: 	        14 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019600 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he has 22 years of dedicated service with the Sheriff's Office and that he is currently a sergeant with the Sheriff's Office in Ulster County, New York.  He contends that he needs the AFEM added to his DD Form 214 to purchase his military credit to retire.  He points out that there is a bill in Congress to remove the need for the AFEM as a requirement and that “the bill is passed but not signed into law.”  He states that he spent two years of dedicated service overseas in Germany during the period of the Grenada Operation.      

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 November 1980 and trained as a personnel records specialist.  He served in Germany from 1 September 1982 through 26 October 1984.  On 30 October 1984, he was released from active duty.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the AFEM as an authorized award.

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Grenada.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), provides, in pertinent part, that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have participated in operations or in direct support of operations for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.  

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, table 2-2 authorizes this award for service in Berlin during the period 14 August 1961 to 1 June 1963.  Qualifying service for this award includes participation in Grenada in support of Operation Urgent Fury from 23 October to 21 November 1983.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant did not serve a period of qualifying service for award of the AFEM.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of this medal. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019600



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019600



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015591

    Original file (20100015591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his participation in Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the AFEM for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000656

    Original file (20150000656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in U.S. military operations, U.S. operations in direct support of the United Nations, and U.S. operations of assistance for friendly foreign nations. The available evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was ever assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 325th Infantry Regiment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000044

    Original file (20110000044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders to South Korea, dated 27June 1975 * Two DA Forms 67-7 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the periods September 1975 - 9 September 1976 and September 1976 - November 1976 * PCS orders from South Korea, dated 9 August 1976 * Certificate of Achievement, dated 1 June 1985 * Three DA Forms 67-8 (U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010177C070208

    Original file (20040010177C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that item 12f (Foreign Service) his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show his foreign service. The applicant provides: a. The applicant provided a copy of a certificate which shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for service in Grenada during the period 24 October 1983 through 2 November 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014960

    Original file (20080014960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy. It states, in pertinent part, that a DD Form 214 will be prepared to document a period of active duty service for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of active duty service between 20 September 1974 and 27 March 1978 and that his service in MOS 11B is properly documented on this separation document.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005198

    Original file (20110005198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests her record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by documenting her service in Grenada and by adding any awards due based on this Grenada service. The evidence of record shows that although the unit received the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service in Grenada between 23 October and 21 November 1983, the unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005605

    Original file (20110005605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this award and his deployment to Grenada in support of Operation Urgent Fury. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002375

    Original file (20080002375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Urgent Fury Ribbon, Jungle Expert Patch, and Cold Weather Patch. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the AFEM requested.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005385

    Original file (20120005385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, the regulation states that for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, enter in item 18 "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)." _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013501

    Original file (20090013501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a 5-point veterans' preference and award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medals for Grenada and Lebanon. He was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for his service as proof that he was there during that period but the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was not added to his DD Form 214. With respect to the Armed Forces Service Medal, there is no evidence that the applicant was...