Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019421
Original file (20080019421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        26 MARCH 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019421 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his category of participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage. 

2.  The applicant states that the FSM listed her as his beneficiary for SBP benefits and he never changed it because he wanted her taken care of in the event of his death.  She goes on to state that she was married to the FSM for 14 years and although he remarried, he was always there for her and the children.  She continues by stating that the FSM was adamant that she was to remain his beneficiary for his SBP benefits, despite objections from his current spouse; however, he would not change it.  Accordingly, the Board should honor his wishes and provide her with the appropriate SBP annuity.

3.  The applicant provides a two-page explanation of her application, a copy of her divorce decree from the FSM, a copy of a DD Form 2656-7 (Verification For Survivor Annuity),  a copy of the FSM's Last Will and Testament, a copy of the FSM's death certificate, and four letters of support from four of the FSM's daughters and his former brother-in-law.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was born on 13 September 1947 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 March 1967.  He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 19 March 1987.  He married the applicant on 12 May 1980.

3.  On 24 April 1992, while stationed at Fort Dix, New Jersey, he applied for voluntary retirement by reason of length of service, to be effective 31 August 1992.

4.  On 30 July 1992, the FSM completed his SBP Election and opted to elect full coverage for spouse and children.  

5.  His application was approved and he was released from active duty on 31 August 1992 and was placed on the Retired List, effective 1 September 1992.  He had served 25 years, 5 months and 12 days of total active service.  His youngest child's date of birth was in August 1987.

6.  The FSM filed for divorce in Williamsburg, Virginia and on 29 September 1994, the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce.  The divorce decree contains no provisions regarding the FSM's military pension or SBP benefits.  The FSM was residing in New Jersey at the time of the divorce.

7.  The FSM passed away in New Jersey on 23 October 2007.  The death certificate issued indicates that he was married at the time of his death.

8.  In the processing of this case a staff member contacted officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Cleveland, Ohio to ascertain the status of the FSM's SBP account.  Officials at the DFAS indicated that the FSM's SBP annuity is being paid to his widow.  There was no evidence in his records at the DFAS to show that he ever made a former spouse election and his records contain a copy of his divorce decree and his marriage license.

9.  Public Law 92-425, the Survivor Benefit Plan, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Retiring members and spouses were to be informed of the SBP options and effects.  This law also provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Election of beneficiaries is made by category only, not by name.  Except as provided by law, an election, once made, is irrevocable.

10.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: (1) if the service member voluntarily elects to provide a former spouse annuity; (2) the election is made in order to comply with a court order; or (3) the election is made to comply with a voluntary written agreement related to a divorce action and that voluntary agreement is part of a court order for divorce, dissolution, or annulment.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM made an irrevocable election for full spouse and child coverage at the time he completed the election forms just prior to his retirement.

2.  It appears that since there were no provisions contained in the divorce decree directing that the FSM provide SBP benefits to the applicant/former spouse that the FSM elected to retain the SBP benefits for his current spouse/widow.  The law provides that when an election of former spouses coverage is voluntary it must be made within 1 year of a divorce.  

3.  Inasmuch as the FSM's widow (current spouse at the time of his death) is currently receiving the SBP annuity and the applicant has not provided a statement from her that shows she agrees to change the FSM's election, there is insufficient basis to grant the relief requested. 
4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019421





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019421



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021045

    Original file (20130021045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The divorce decree shows that the Court ordered the FSM to execute the documents required "to effect the expressed reservation of the said military retirement account." The evidence of record shows that an SBP annuity has not been paid to the applicant because neither the FSM nor the applicant notified DFAS within 1 year from the date of their divorce to change the FSM's SBP beneficiary to former spouse. Additionally, if the applicant is able to show when the FSM married Renee B. and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013171

    Original file (20100013171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her former spouse's records to show she made a deemed election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year of their divorce. d. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. f. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023708

    Original file (20100023708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record is void of any indication the FSM complied with the divorce decree to maintain SBP coverage for the applicant as "former spouse" and there is no indication the applicant requested a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the divorce. DFAS records show the FSM's SBP coverage designation at the time of his death was still "spouse only" and the FSM's widow is now the legal beneficiary of the SBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008265

    Original file (20090008265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows the FSM ever made the Former Spouse SBP election directed in the divorce decree, or that the applicant requested a deemed election be made within one year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: (1) if the service member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017623

    Original file (20140017623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a letter dated 14 August 2012, DFAS denied her request and informed her that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for the SBP, the former spouse had to be awarded the SBP in the divorce decree and the applicant or her attorney would have to deem her election for former spouse SBP coverage within 1 year of the date of the divorce. Records on file at DFAS reflected the retiree's SBP election was for spouse coverage and they did not receive a deemed election from her within 1 year of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002952

    Original file (20130002952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the FSM’s record be corrected to show the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary for the FSM's SBP benefits. Counsel states at the time of their divorce the FSM and the applicant were unaware of the requirement set forth in the U.S. Code requiring a former spouse deemed election with respect to the FSM's SBP. On 14 August 2012, DFAS stated, in response to the above letter, that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for the SBP the former spouse had to be awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024481

    Original file (20110024481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier request for correction of her deceased former husband's records, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. The applicant states: a. she now provides a notarized statement from the FSM's widow renouncing her right to an SBP annuity as indicated in the "Discussion and Conclusions" section of the original Record of Proceedings; and b. contrary to the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007672

    Original file (AR20140007672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DFAS provided multiple documents among which was: * copy of the applicant's deemed election request for former spouse coverage, which was submitted within 1 year after the divorce * counsel's reinforcement of the applicant's deemed election request * applicant's and FSM's divorce decree * FSM's Death Certificate showing he died on 9 February 2014 * applicant's Death Certificate showing she died on 1 June 2014 * DFAS' denial of benefits letter to the FSM's widow * widow's Marriage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012684

    Original file (20090012684.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he participated in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with former spouse coverage. This document shows the applicant requested that the Court equitably distribute the parties' retirement plans, including, in pertinent part, "Military Retirement, or any and all other forms of retirement and death or survivor's benefits." c. Thus, the evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003451

    Original file (20130003451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired and deceased former service member (FSM), requests payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant and the FSM were divorced in 1995.