Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019368
Original file (20080019368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       5 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019368 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Army Commendation Medal.  

2.  The applicant states that these medals were not listed on his military discharge document upon separation.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  his DD Form 214; his award certificate, dated 19 April 1970, for award of the Bronze Star Medal; General Orders Number 2423, dated 15 April 1970, awarding him the Bronze Star Medal; his award certificate, dated 1 May 1970, for award of the Army Commendation Medal; his separation orders, dated 16 April 1970; his request for award of the additional military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B4O (light weapons infantryman), dated 19 April 1970; and his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, dated 19 April 1970.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 August 1968.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded MOS 31B (field radio mechanic).  His highest grade attained was sergeant, E-5.  He was assigned to Vietnam on 29 May 1969 with Company A, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division.  

3.  Headquarters, General Orders Number 804, dated 6 February 1970, awarded the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 August 1968 to date of separation on or about 28 March 1970.  

4.  Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 2423, dated 15 April 1970, show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement during the period 7 December 1969 to 7 January 1970.

5.  The applicant provided an award certificate, dated 1 May 1970, which shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam from May 1969 to May 1970.  There are no orders which authorize him award of the Army Commendation Medal.  

6.  The applicant was released from active duty on 4 May 1970.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and two Overseas Service Bars.  

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal any orders for the Army Commendation Medal.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to Company A, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders Number 3, dated 1970.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to Company A, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

11.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows the campaigns for Vietnam.  During the applicant’s tour in Vietnam he participated in the Tet 69 Counteroffensive 1969 Campaign, the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 Campaign, the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 Campaign, and the Sanctuary Counteroffensive Campaign.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement during the period 7 December 1969 to 7 January 1970.  Therefore, the Bronze Star Medal should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant provided an award certificate for the Army Commendation Medal.  Regrettably, however, absent orders authorizing him award of the Army Commendation Medal, this document alone is not sufficient to support correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.  However, if the applicant has orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal, he is advised to provide a copy of these orders for reconsideration of his request.

3.  General orders show the applicant was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division during a period the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, these foreign unit awards should be added to his DD Form 214.

5.  Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, records show the applicant participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of four bronze service stars to be affixed to the previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ______X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing the Army Commendation Medal on his DD Form 214.  




      _______ _   XXX_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019368



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019368



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000498C070205

    Original file (20060000498C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 OCTOBER 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000498 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the Vietnam Service Medal. Orders verify that the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show awards of the ARCOM and the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008567

    Original file (20080008567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Silver Star and the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Silver Star, the Army Commendation Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016202C070206

    Original file (20050016202C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016566

    Original file (20070016566.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the awards of the ARCOM; Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 23 May 1968 to 22 May 1970; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021495

    Original file (20100021495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) 13. Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069325C070402

    Original file (2002069325C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards and decorations as the Army Commendation Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below will correct an error. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025343

    Original file (20100025343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: 20100025343 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Purple Heart * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Overseas Service Ribbon (5th Award) * Bronze Star Medal * Expert Infantryman Badge * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000609

    Original file (20110000609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 January 1967 through 14 January 1970; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082808C070215

    Original file (2002082808C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Air Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Gallantry Cross, and the Purple Heart. Evidence shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for the period January 1969 to January 1970, and the Air Medal for the period 29 January 1969 to 23 October 1969 while serving in Vietnam, and as such his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect these awards. The applicant completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010761

    Original file (20090010761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010761 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides an undated letter from his son, addressed "To Whom It May Concern," requesting that his request be expedited; a statement dated 11 January 2009 from a retired lieutenant colonel who contends that he was the Delta Company Commander; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); a copy of a certificate...