Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019249
Original file (20080019249.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       3 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019249 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show the date of entry on active duty as 16 November 1950 instead of 16 November 1952.

2.  The applicant states that he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 16 November 1950, but his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows the date of entry as 16 November 1952.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 December 1952 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 November 1950.  However, this form shows he entered active duty in Buffalo, NY, on 16 November 1952.  This form also shows that at the time of his separation, he was assigned as a clerk to Headquarters Company, 373rd Transportation Motor Pool.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 further shows that he completed 2 years of creditable military service, 2 months and 7 days of which was foreign service.  He was appointed/promoted to private first class (temporary) on 26 May 1952 and was honorably separated and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group on 5 December 1952.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The preponderance of the evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 16 November 1950.  However, his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows the year of entry on active duty as 1952 instead of 1950.  He completed 2 years of active military service and was honorably separated on 5 December 1952.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct date of entry on active duty.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "16 November 1952" from item 19 (Date and Place of Entry on Active Duty) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 and adding the entry "16 November 1950."


																XXX
      _________________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019249



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019249



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009335

    Original file (20090009335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that block 19 (Inducted) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 17 November 1950 instead of 17 November 1952 as currently reflected. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 19 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012114

    Original file (20140012114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the United Nations Service Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 19 of his DD Form 214 the year "1952" and adding "1950" and b. adding to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025197

    Original file (20110025197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Army Forces of the United States) to show his correct date of birth (DOB). The evidence of record shows the applicant's DOB is 17 July 1928 and that his DOB is correctly recorded on his SF 88 and in the National Archive's recordkeeping system for veterans. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show his correct DOB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015372

    Original file (20060015372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015372 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his most significant duty assignment, date of induction, and service stars awards be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013706

    Original file (20140013706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Silver Star and that his discharge certificate be corrected to show he was inducted in March instead of May and his last name corrected on his Certificate of Service. He had served 1 year, 9 months and 4 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Korean...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014871

    Original file (20140014871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 correctly credited him with 5 years, 8 months, and 17 days of active service (the period from 19 March 1953 to 17 December 1958) as well as his prior active service of 2 years and 8 months (from 19 July 1950 to 18 March 1953) for a total of 8 years, 4 months, and 17 days of active service. His DD Form 214 correctly captured his active service and there is no need to correct it.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006107

    Original file (20110006107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's NPRC file does not include any documents to show the applicant's USAR service. b. Paragraph 5-9 provides for award of the KSM and it states that the KSM is awarded for service in Korea between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954 and that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the ROK. However, in the event the applicant was seeking award of the ARCAM, the evidence of record does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003015

    Original file (20070003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows, at the time of the applicant’s separation from active duty, the instructions for recording entries in Item 12 (Description – Race) of the DD Form 214 state to enter the Race precisely as shown on the enlistment record filed with the Service Record. The applicant’s military Service Record is not available to the Board. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the applicant’s Race (i.e., being recorded as Black);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017030

    Original file (20080017030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019824

    Original file (20110019824.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). As a result, given the absence of derogatory information in the available NPRC file or on the DD Form 214 and given his valorous combat service record, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity to err in favor of the applicant and to award him the AGCM based on his overall record of honorable service and to add this award to his DD Form 214. The available evidence also shows that based on his qualifying...