Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019163
Original file (20080019163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        28 APRIL 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019163 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 6 September 1963 to show his date of entry as 21 January 1961.

2.  The applicant states that the copy of his DA Form 261 (Request for Records and Official Statement of Service from The Adjutant General) clearly reflects that he entered active duty on 21 January 1961.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DA Form 261, dated 3 June 1963; a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 18 August 1961; a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 September 1963; a copy of Special Orders Number 208, dated 26 August 1963, releasing him from assignment and duty; and two pages of medical notes. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 

substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States) shows that on 23 January 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.  He successfully completed his training as a light weapons infantryman.

3.  On 18 August 1961, the applicant was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  At the time of his discharge during this period of service from 23 January 1961 through 18 August 1961 he completed 6 months and 26 days of creditable active service.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service.

4.  The applicant immediately reenlisted in the RA on 19 August 1961 for a period of 3 years.  After completing 1 year, 1 month, and 7 days of net service this period, he was honorably retired on 6 September 1963 by reason of temporary disability.  At the time of his retirement, the applicant was furnished another DD Form 214 to reflect his current period of service.  It also reflects his
6 months and 26 days of other service [relating to his prior active service] covered by his previous DD Form 214.

5.  The DA Form 261 that the applicant submitted in support of his application is dated 3 June 1963 and it shows his date of enlistment in the RA as 21 January 1961.  The form was prepared by a medical personnel officer and in the remarks section of the form it reads "Above information has not been verified by service record of enlisted member."

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of release from active duty (REFRAD) or discharge.  It further states that for item 19c (Date of Entry), enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued (emphasis added).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 September 1963 should be corrected to show his date of entry as 21 January 1961.
2.  The applicant's DD Form 4 shows that he initially enlisted in the RA on 23 January 1961.  The applicant was subsequently discharged on 18 August 1961 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  As a result, the applicant was furnished a DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 August 1961 that properly reflects his period of service from 23 January 1961 through 18 August 1961.  

3.  The applicant provided a DD Form 214 that reflects his date of entry in the RA as 19 August 1961.  This DD Form 214 was furnished to the applicant to reflect his second period of service which terminated on 6 September 1963.  This DD Form 214 shows, in effect, that he entered active service this period on
19 August 1961 and was released from active duty on 6 September 1963 and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List.  The DD Form 214 for this period also properly reflects this period of service and is signed by the applicant.

4.  The applicant served during two periods of active duty serve and was properly issued two DD Forms 214, each reflecting the specific period of service completed.  Therefore, the DD Forms 214 issued to the applicant are correct as constituted.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019163



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019163



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010045

    Original file (20130010045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 29 April 1985, to reflect the entry date of 8 January 1976. Item 12b of his 1985 DD Form 214 has an entry date of 2 August 1979 and it should be 9 March 1976. The applicant provides: * 1976 DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement – Armed Forces of the United States) (3 pages) * 1978 DD Form 4 (1 page) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025252

    Original file (20100025252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The evidence of record also shows he completed a period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000344

    Original file (20120000344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019706

    Original file (20100019706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 31 October 1982 to: * show he had no inactive service * show he completed 5 years of foreign service in Panama and two 12-month tours in Korea 2. The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for this period of service shows he completed 1 month and 20 days of foreign service in Korea during the period covered by this DD Form 214. With respect to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017617

    Original file (20140017617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 3 (Social Security Number (SSN)) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 10 January 1969 to show his SSN as "X96-XX-XXXX" instead of "X69-XX-XXXX." The regulations stated the DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. Therefore, the evidence of record is sufficient to support correction of item 3 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011780

    Original file (20060011780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter requested that this particular headquarters be authorized to correct the applicant’s DD Form 4, dated 7 September 1961. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 3 years of honorable service from 14 September 1960 through 13 September 1963 and was promoted to specialist four. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 September 1964 to show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004387

    Original file (20120004387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show awards of the: * National Defense Service Medal * Cold War Certificate * “Foreign Service Medal” (i.e.,Overseas Service Ribbon) 2. The applicant provides: * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center * Statement of Service, CAARNG * Honorable Discharge Certificate, CAARNG * Honorable Discharge Certificate, USAR * Honorable Discharge Certificate, RA * DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012916

    Original file (20110012916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 18 March 1954 through 6 September 1955. The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 7 September 1955 through 25 July 1957. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to the Remarks section of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 July 1963 the following entry: * Inducted on 18 March 1954 * Honorably discharged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003818

    Original file (20150003818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 18 January 1965. His record contains a DA Form 24, for the period 15 January 1962 through 18 January 1965, that shows in: * Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) – * he was reduced to pay grade E-2 on 4 January 1963 * he was advanced to pay grade E-3 on 8 April 1963 * he was promoted to pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011760

    Original file (20130011760.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His records are void of any of the DD Forms 214 he may have been issued during his active duty service between 20 February 1963 and 22 March 1978. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...