Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019095
Original file (20080019095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  24 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019095 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, correspondence from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) confirms he was awarded the Purple Heart for tinnitus.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of page 2 of his VA Rating Decision (2008).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 15 April 1963.  Upon completion of basic combat and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's military personnel records contain a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

   a.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows that he served in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 15 August 1965 through 4 April 1966.

	b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to Company B, 2d Squadron, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (USARPAC), from 16 August 
1965 to 3 April 1966.

	c.  Item 40 (Wounds) is absent an entry.

	d.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) fails to show he was authorized award of the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant's military personnel records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he entered active duty on 15 April 1963.  Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) shows he was assigned to Company B, 2d Squadron, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (U.S. Army Vietnam).  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle and (.45 caliber) Pistol Bars, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-1) Rifle and (M-60) Machinegun Bars.  Item 27 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) contains the entry "none."  The DD Form 214 also shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 10 April 1966 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining military service obligation.  At the time he had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 26 days of net active service this period; 2 years, 11 months, and 26 days of total active service; and 7 months and 24 days of foreign service.

5.  There is no documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.  There is also no evidence that the applicant was admitted to a military hospital at any time during his tour of duty in the RVN.  In addition, a review of the Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division Casualty Reference Name Listing for Vietnam confirmed that the applicant’s name is not listed on the roster.
6.  A thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicant’s records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  In addition, a search of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System for the Vietnam Conflict failed to produce orders showing award of the Purple Heart to the applicant.

7.  In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of page 2 of his VA Rating Decision (2008).  Paragraph 1 (Service connection for tinnitus) shows, in pertinent part, "[a] review of your service treatment record does not show complaint, treatment, or diagnosis for hearing loss of either ear.  Your DD Form 214 shows that you served in Vietnam in an armor unit.  Your decorations include the Purple Heart Medal.  You reported military noise exposure (emphasis added)."  This paragraph also shows that an evaluation of 10 percent was assigned and granted for recurrent tinnitus effective 7 March 
2008.  Paragraph 2 (Service connection for bilateral hearing loss) shows, in pertinent part, "[a] review of your service treatment record does not show complaint, treatment, or diagnosis for hearing loss of either ear.  Your DD Form 214 shows that you served in Vietnam in an armor unit.  Your decorations include the Purple Heart Medal.  You reported military noise exposure."  This paragraph also shows "[t]he examiner stated that [the applicant’s] hearing is normally [sic], bilaterally."

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  This Army regulation, in pertinent part, states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  It also gives examples of enemy-related injuries, which justify award of the Purple Heart, which includes concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.  It also provides that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  This regulation also provides examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart and cites, in pertinent part, accidents involving explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounds or injuries not related to or caused by enemy action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge document should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because his Department of VA Rating Decision confirms he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's name is not listed on the Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division Casualty Reference Name Listing for Vietnam; and there are no orders in the applicant’s military personnel records or in the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.  In addition, there is no evidence in the applicant’s military service records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that such wound required treatment, or that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

3.  The applicant’s claim that he received the Purple Heart during his service in the RVN was carefully considered.  However, the applicant provides no official documentary evidence pertaining to the nature of the injury (e.g., battle casualty report, medical treatment records, etc.) in support of his request.  In addition, the VA Rating Decision confirms that the applicant’s military service treatment records do not show complaint, treatment or diagnosis for hearing loss of either ear.  Moreover, notwithstanding the VA Rating Decision that indicates that the applicant’s decorations include the Purple Heart, there is no evidence of record that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart.  It is noted that the Military Awards regulation provides examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart and cites, in pertinent part, accidents involving explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounds or injuries not related to or caused by enemy action.  In this regard, the applicant contends that his tinnitus was related to "military noise exposure."  Thus, the applicant provides insufficient evidence in support of his claim to the Purple Heart.  Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


BOARD VOTE:
________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019095



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019095



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002119

    Original file (20120002119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA documents severe hearing loss in both ears and this condition has left him with poor communication skills which cannot be improved and has affected his employability since his return from Vietnam in 1970. c. A second self-authored statement, dated 22 December 2011, in which he describes two additional sapper attacks during his service in Vietnam. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020430

    Original file (20100020430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While a civilian physician stated the applicant's hearing loss was due to noise exposure in Vietnam, the VA physician opined that noise exposure in Vietnam probably did not cause hearing loss based on his hearing at the time of enlistment. Without evidence that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient basis to grant his request. __________ X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000416

    Original file (20080000416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Assault Badge, the Long Range Reconnaissance Platoon (LRRP) Badge (Tab), the Purple Heart, and any other citations to which he is entitled. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant completed an air assault training course. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show the LRRP Badge (Tab) is noted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080017432

    Original file (AR20080017432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's military personnel records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty this period on 13 February 1964. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41; his DA Form 2-1 does...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012022

    Original file (20110012022 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart and his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005941

    Original file (20090005941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant was a 2-year draftee serving from 27 March 1969 to 26 March 1971. There is no evidence the applicant’s temporary hearing loss in his left ear was caused by hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011848

    Original file (20130011848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 April 2013, his request was denied based on the medical documentation provided by the applicant that indicated his follow up examination for subjective hearing loss and tympanic membrane perforation following exposure to an IED attack was normal and without limitations. The fact that the applicant sustained a perforated eardrum while serving in Iraq is not disputed; however, the evidence provided by the applicant shows that on 1 December 2005, he sought treatment for ear pain and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003440

    Original file (20140003440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the award. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available military service records do not show any evidence that he was wounded or injured in action as a result of a hostile act of the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017672

    Original file (20110017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he received a blast injury from enemy explosives while serving in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. While the attending medic provided a statement which shows the blast was a result of explosive devices planted by the enemy, his statement alone does not provide the conclusive evidence necessary to support award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022373

    Original file (20100022373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The symptoms got worse and he was sent to the hospital with a headache, nausea, dizziness, vision loss, abdominal pain, weight loss, and diarrhea. A DA Form 2173, dated 17 January 2007, states he was treated at the Medical Clinic, Balad, Iraq, on 8 May 2006 for multiple welts and a rash on his back. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide conclusive evidence to show he received injuries/wounds as a result of this mortar attack or that he was treated...