Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019027
Original file (20080019027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080019027 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Air Medal (AM) and the Pathfinder Badge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he attended Pathfinder school in June or July of 1965.  However, both his AM and his Pathfinder Badge are not annotated on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  He further states he would like his Pathfinder Badge sent to him and that his DD Form 214 be corrected to add both his award of the AM and the Pathfinder Badge.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 2578, dated 28 July 1966.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 16 September 1964.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he attained the rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 29 September 1966, and that this is the highest rank he held while serving on active duty.   Item 27 (Military Education) is void of an entry showing the applicant attended a Pathfinder Course conducted by the United States Army Infantry School. 

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the Parachutist Badge, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM).

5.  The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents confirming he was ever awarded the Pathfinder Badge by proper authority.

6.  On 18 September 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD).  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he completed a total of 3 years of active military service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that during his active duty tenure, he earned the Parachutist Badge, CIB, NDSM, VSM, and the RVNCM.

7.  The applicant provides Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 2578, dated 28 July 1966.  This document awarded him the Air Medal for his meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight during the period 22 September 1965 to 18 February 1966.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 8-25, states in pertinent part that the Pathfinder Badge is authorized to any Soldier who has successfully completed the Pathfinder Course conducted by the United States Army Infantry 

School.  It further states in pertinent part that the Pathfinder Badge is authorized to any Soldier who has previously been awarded the Pathfinder award for completion of Pathfinder training.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his award of the AM was carefully considered and found to have merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the AM for his meritorious achievement in flight in the RVN during the period 22 September 1965 to 18 February 1966, as evidenced by the AM orders he provided.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and separation document at this time.

2.  The applicant's contention of entitlement to award of the Pathfinder Badge was carefully considered.  However, the applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents showing he was ever awarded the Pathfinder Badge by proper authority.  Furthermore, the applicant's DA Form 20 is void of any entry confirming his attendance at the United States Army Infantry School to attend a Pathfinder course.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief at this time.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214, dated 18 September 1967, the Air Medal.




2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Pathfinder Badge.



      ________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019027



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080019027



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011984

    Original file (20060011984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011984 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001494

    Original file (20080001494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Company A, 502nd Aviation Battalion from 3 June through 22 September 1966, performing duties in MOS 94B as a cook; and that from 23 September 1966 through 22 June 1967, he was assigned to the 175th Aviation Company, initially performing duties in MOS 94B, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231

    Original file (20090005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013950

    Original file (20130013950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His service record is void of evidence which indicates he completed the Pathfinder Course or orders that show he was awarded the Pathfinder Badge. The evidence of record shows he performed duties as a Pathfinder during his assignment in Vietnam; however, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence which shows he completed the Pathfinder Course or was awarded the Pathfinder Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014402

    Original file (20090014402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), AM, Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and one overseas service bar. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017519

    Original file (20090017519.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and he entered active duty on 20 May 1965. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 20 May 1965 through 14 May 1967 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM for his qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071603C070402

    Original file (2002071603C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he attended Pathfinder Class 1-78, that an earlier DD Form 214 included his CIB, and that other members of his company received the Air Medal but he did not. There is no evidence of record, no USARV Form 131 on the applicant is available, and he has submitted no evidence to show he was eligible for award of the Air Medal. The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows he completed HALO training; however, his DA Form 1307 is not available and he has not submitted a course...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004983

    Original file (20090004983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Combat service alone does not support award of the CIB. _________X_________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088647C070403

    Original file (2003088647C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are also no other award orders or other documents on file in the MPRJ that indicate that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM with “V” Device while serving in the RVN. Paragraph 6-5 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the “V” Device. However, although the record confirms he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service, it contains no evidence to indicate that he received the “V” Device with this award or with any other award he received during his tenure...