Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018845.
Original file (20080018845..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       3 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018845 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, as the mother of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her late son be posthumously awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that her son was mortally wounded by friendly fire that was intended for the enemy.

3.  A letter, provided on behalf of the applicant by her daughter, states that the FSM was killed in Vietnam in 1966, that he did not receive the Purple Heart for his heroic service in Vietnam, and that she believes this was an oversight because his unit was in the middle of a large scale offensive mission at the time. She states that telegrams and a Statement of Casualty report indicate the FSM was shot by friendly fire while on guard duty on 11 August 1966 and later died on 15 August 1966 as a result of cardiac arrest.   

4.  The applicant provides an undated letter from her daughter; a DA Form 52-2 (Statement of Casualty), dated 19 August 1966; three August 1966 Western Union telegrams; numerous entries from her son’s “Vietnam Diary”; an Honorable Service certificate; and a letter, dated 2 September 1966, from the Commanding General, U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam  in support of her application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 January 1965 for a period of 
3 years.  He successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training in military occupational specialty 11H (infantry direct fire crewman).  He arrived in Vietnam on 15 July 1966.

3.  A DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 19 August 1966, states, in pertinent part, that the FSM died on 15 August 1966 in Vietnam as the result of cardiac arrest due to a gunshot wound to the abdomen incurred on the night of 11 August 1966 when he was hit by small arms fire, fired by friendly forces.  This form also states that it was a non-battle casualty report.

4.  A DD Form 1300, dated 31 October 1966, states, in pertinent part, that the FSM died on 15 August 1966 in Vietnam as the result of cardiac arrest due to a gunshot wound to the abdomen incurred on the night of 11 August 1966.  It states that the FSM was moving about the company position in the darkness when he was challenged by a sentry who then fired on him before he could make his identity known.  This form also states that it was a non-battle casualty report.

5.  In support of her claim, the applicant provided Western Union telegrams which state the FSM was placed on the seriously ill list in Vietnam on 11 August 1966 as the result of a gunshot wound to his left thigh while on guard duty and that he died on 15 August 1966 as a result of the gunshot wound.  She also provided entries from his Vietnam diary.   

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided 
to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have 

required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have 
been made a matter of official record.  The regulation also provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart to individuals wounded or killed as a result of “friendly fire” in the “heat of battle” as long as the “friendly” projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s contentions were carefully considered.  However, the non-battle casualty report shows the FSM, while on guard duty, was moving about the company position in the darkness when he was challenged by a sentry who then fired on him before he could make his identity known (i.e., friendly fire).  There is no evidence of record which shows the “friendly fire” was in the “heat of battle,” as required by the governing regulation.  Regrettably, in the absence of evidence to show the guard position was under attack at the time the FSM was struck by friendly fire, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by her son in service to our 

Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her son's service in arms.  




      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018845



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018845



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005587

    Original file (20090005587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, as the mother of a deceased former service member (FSM), through her Congressional representative, reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denial of her request to posthumously award her son the Purple Heart. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080018845, on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005661C070205

    Original file (20060005661C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member, requests, in effect, that orders for the Purple Heart be awarded posthumously to her late husband. Although the 1967 letter shows the Purple Heart was awarded posthumously to the FSM, there are no orders for the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding to him, posthumously, the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021321

    Original file (20100021321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show awards of the: * Purple Heart * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * any and all awards as a result of his service in Vietnam 2. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows the FSM sustained wounds or injuries as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102653C070208

    Original file (2004102653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated that the basic criteria for award of the Purple Heart required that it be awarded to soldiers for wounds or injuries received as a direct result of enemy action. While the statement described what happened on 21 February 1969, the major general does not state that he was present when the aircraft crashed or that he witnessed the aircraft being hit by enemy fire causing it to crash. Notwithstanding the evidence submitted by the applicant, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019769

    Original file (20110019769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the sister of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the late FSM's record to show he was killed in action against an enemy of the United States or as a result of an act of any such enemy or opposing forces. The personal statements also state four of the members wounded that day were awarded the Purple Heart but the FSM and one other member, who were initially listed as missing in action, were not awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011341

    Original file (20110011341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant is basing his request for award of the Purple Heart to the FSM on the WD AGO Form 8-24, dated 12 August 1945, which clearly shows the FSM sustained NBC gunshot wounds after being shot by a Frenchman who also shot into several U.S. The applicant provided insufficient evidence to show the FSM was hospitalized to receive medical treatment for severe frostbite or frozen feet while engaged in combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002886

    Original file (20090002886.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002886 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains an AGPZ Form 80 (Report of Casualty), dated 14 February 1968, which shows he died from a gunshot wound he received while in a building when engaged in a firefight against a hostile force. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018947

    Original file (20130018947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he was wounded by "friendly fire" and awarded the Purple Heart. The FSM's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows that both the U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force award approval authorities considered the evidence and determined there was insufficient available evidence to award the FSM the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018191

    Original file (20140018191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. PFC GPC noticed that PFC JPD had a mortar in his hands and told him that he should leave the mortar alone; however, PFC JPD ignored him. SFC WBA took the empty canister...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010867

    Original file (20070010867.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty), dated 17 November 1967, shows that the casualty status was "Non Battle" and that the FSM died on 8 November 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam as a result of injuries sustained while a pilot of military aircraft which crashed into the water. Because there was no definitive determination that the crash was caused by hostile action, and not the result of mechanical failure or other accident, regrettably there is insufficient evidence on which to base award...