Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018817
Original file (20080018817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 May 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018817 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse and child(ren) coverage to former spouse and child(ren) coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, she was unaware of the requirement to change the SBP election based on their divorce.  She found out when she reported the FSM's death on 19 November 2008.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of her application, copies of the FSM's 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), marriage license, two Retiree Account Statements, Judgment of Absolute Divorce, and the FSM's death certificate.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's DD Form 214 shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
19 August 1983.  At the time, he had completed more than 5 years of prior active duty service.  

2.  On 14 February 1987, the FSM and the applicant married.



3.  The FSM served through a series of enlistments and retired due to length of service on 30 November 2000.  He had attained the rank of sergeant first class, pay grade E-7, and had completed a total of 22 years, 6 months, and 11 days of creditable active duty service.

4.  The FSM's DFAS-CL 7220 (Retiree Account Statement), effective
7 December 2000, shows that he had elected SBP coverage for spouse and child(ren).

5.  The Judgment of Absolute Divorce, effective 19 July 2006, required, in effect, the applicant and FSM to complete the documents required for reassigning his SBP benefit from spouse and child(ren) to former spouse and child(ren). 

6.  The FSM's DFAS-CL 7220, effective May 2008, shows that he was still making payments for SBP coverage for spouse and child(ren).

7.  The FSM's death certificate shows that he died on 14 November 2008.  The death certificate also shows that he was divorced. 

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

9.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.

10.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(2) permits a person, incident to a proceeding of divorce, to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse if required by court order to do so.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one 
year of the date of the court order or filing involved.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the FSM's military records should be changed to show that he had elected SBP coverage for former spouse and child(ren).

2.  When the applicant divorced in July 2006, the Judgment of Absolute Divorce assigned the SBP benefit to his former spouse.  There is no evidence showing that either the FSM or the applicant took any action to change the SBP election as required by the divorce decree.  

3.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant continued to make SBP payments from his retiree pay account and was still divorced at the time of his death.

4.  Based on the evidence in this case, it would be equitable to correct the FSM’s records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse and child(ren) coverage to former spouse and child(ren) coverage in the manner prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
	
    a.   showing that he made a written request to change his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse and child(ren) coverage on 19 July 2006 and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner; and



     b.  paying to the applicant the SBP annuity retroactive to the date of the FSM’s death.



      ________X_______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018817



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018817



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028877

    Original file (20100028877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence that shows he changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce, and there is no indication the applicant requested the SBP coverage be deemed to her as a former spouse. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030020

    Original file (20100030020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011766

    Original file (20130011766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel provides copies of the following documents: * FSM's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points * FSM's Death Certificate * Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage * Mediation Agreement * 20-year letter * email messages, dated March 2013 * Military Pension Division Order * former attorney's letter to DFAS, dated 28 December 2009 * extract of DODFMR 7000.14-R * HRC letter, dated 19 January 2012 * applicant's Application for Survivor Annuity, dated 30 January 2012 * HRC letter,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003460

    Original file (20090003460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record confirms the FSM initially elected SBP coverage for “spouse and children” at the time of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000767

    Original file (20120000767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity enrollment election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. On 9 May 2007, the applicant and the FSM were divorced. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, and as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005504C070208

    Original file (20040005504C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests either that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse and children coverage to former spouse and children coverage or that his children be determined to be eligible beneficiaries for the SBP. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015647

    Original file (20080015647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased ex-husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse at the full base pay rate. The applicant states, in effect, she and the FSM, who was already retired from the Army, married in December 1985 and had two children together. There is no evidence that shows the FSM submitted a written request to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553

    Original file (20060013553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004478

    Original file (20090004478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show she submitted a "deemed election" in a timely manner establishing herself as the beneficiary for benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as a former spouse. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. The law also permits the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003177

    Original file (20130003177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * Decree of Divorce * Last Will and Testament * Family Trust * Certificate of Death CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 23 May 2011, the FSM and applicant divorced. The FSM and applicant were divorced in May 2011.