Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018279
Original file (20080018279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  5 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018279 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The applicant states that the Department of Defense failed to add the Army Commendation Medal to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides an award certificate and citation for the Army Commendation Medal and a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 25 September 1967.  He served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam and was released from active duty on 23 May 1969.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Army Commendation Medal as an authorized award.

4.  There are no orders for the Army Commendation Medal in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal.  A search of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System did not locate orders awarding the applicant the Army Commendation Medal.

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided an award certificate and a citation for the Army Commendation Medal for the period May 1968 to May 1969.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no orders for the Army Commendation Medal in the available records. In the absence of orders, the award certificate and citation provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Army Commendation Medal.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 to show the Army Commendation Medal.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018279



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018279



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019661

    Original file (20100019661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record does not contain orders for a second award of the Army Commendation Medal. However, absent orders authorizing him a second award of the Army Commendation Medal, this document alone is not sufficient in itself to support correction of his records to show a second award of the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show a second award of the Army Commendation Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004250

    Original file (20120004250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal. He completed 2 years of total active service with no time lost. His service records do not contain official orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal and his DA Form 20 (Personnel Qualification Record) makes no mention of this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005097

    Original file (20140005097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) and the Army Commendation Medal. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal orders that show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026169

    Original file (20100026169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. However, there are no orders or any other Army records that show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal or that he was recommended for the award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD, ABCMR, administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. deleting from item 24 of his 4 October 1967, DD Form 214 the "VSM" [Vietnam Service Medal]; b. adding to item 24 of his 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003925

    Original file (20110003925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders (GO) issued by Headquarters, 1st Signal Brigade, USASTRATCOM, awarded the applicant the following: * Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in the RVN from 6 August 1968 to 31 May 1969 by GO Number 1304, dated 18 June 1969 * Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement in the RVN from 22 September to 13 November 1969 by GO Number 214, dated 23 January 1970 * Bronze Star Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster [2nd Award] for meritorious service in the RVN from 1 June 1969 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004636

    Original file (20110004636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 3 years of total active service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Air Medal with third oak leaf cluster, and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Air Medal with Numeral 16 and with "V" Device * Meritorious Unit Commendation (2nd Award) * Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000070

    Original file (20090000070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of any additional Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation medals, and their addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant one silver service star and three bronze service stars to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017728

    Original file (20140017728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), for the period 18 March 1968 through 9 March 1970, and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. His record shows he participated in three campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his previously-authorized Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030461

    Original file (20100030461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 491, Headquarters, I Field Force Vietnam, dated 1 June 1969, awarded him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against an armed hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam, from October 1968 through June 1969. He participated in five campaign phases during his service in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to a single silver service star for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal, and to correction of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019483

    Original file (20080019483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant is therefore entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award), for the period 29 November 1967 to 2 September 1969 and to have it added to his DD Form 214. As such, under the provisions of the Army Regulation 600-8-22, which preclude awards for the same period and in the absence of orders confirming the award, there is insufficient evidence for the Board to correct the applicant’s records to show...