Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018134
Original file (20080018134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        3 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018134 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal

2.  The applicant states that he served with the 1st Cavalry Division in the Republic of Vietnam in 1970 and that he was involved in a fire fight on a bunker by himself.

3.  The applicant provides an undated self-authored statement in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 July 1969.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67V (Helicopter Repairer).  The highest rank/grade he attained during this period of military service was specialist five/E-5. 

3.  The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 17 January 1970 to 11 December 1970.  He was assigned to Company A, 15th Transportation Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Army Commendation Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal.  Item 24 does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  The applicant's records do not contain general orders showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  In an undated self-authored letter, the applicant states that soon after his arrival in the Republic of Vietnam, he was placed in a bunker with two other Soldiers to guard the front line of defense.  As the night fell, he started tracking incoming and immediately notified the sergeant of the guard who told him that there had been reports of wild dogs in the area.  These wild dogs, however, turned out to be enemy soldiers who started firing at him.  He adds that the intense exchange of fire did not awaken his two buddies because they were stoned.  He then notified the sergeant of the guard but was told the fire was too intense to send him reinforcements.  He continued exchanging fire with the enemy and by morning, he had expended most of the available ammunition.  When relief arrived in the morning, the sergeant of the guard told him he should receive a Bronze Star Medal for keeping his bunker from being overrun by the enemy.  





8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.  

9.  Title 10 of the U. S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the available records of the award of the Bronze Star Medal other than the statement submitted by the applicant.  Army regulation states that for personal decorations, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement of orders are required.  There is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018134



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018134



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014952

    Original file (20080014952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. Letter, dated 22 May 2008, from the applicant's former platoon leader to the applicant's counsel. In June 2008, the applicant solicited the help of his counsel to assist him in upgrading his Bronze Star Medal. After returning the fire, [PFC Hxxxxxt] moved toward the enemy position and eliminated it with fire from his rifle.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002670

    Original file (20090002670.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device. However, the approval authority appears to have approved a downgraded award and issued orders awarding the applicant the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009366

    Original file (20100009366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022023

    Original file (20120022023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Company B, 1st Battalion, 14th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division’s Casualty Roster * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 * Letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), page 1 * Notarized justification for award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Three DA Forms 67-5 (U.S. Army Officer Efficiency Report) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant also provides: a. Army Regulation 672-5-1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026404

    Original file (20100026404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal. Since the governing regulation states only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, and the Silver Star is properly shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 September 1969, there is no basis for granting his request to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004351C070205

    Original file (20060004351C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and he performed duties as an infantry when the unit was engaged in active ground combat. In this regard, the only evidence which would indicate the applicant did not perform his duties satisfactorily while engaged in active ground combat is the rating by his first platoon leader on his DA Form 20, and his commander’s recommendation to separate him for unfitness. The applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001196

    Original file (20150001196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 20 October 1969 to 8 July 1971 and b. amending his DD Form 214 by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and adding the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013884

    Original file (20100013884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the SS with OLC or the AM. The citation in his award orders for the SS substantiates that he was actively engaged in ground combat while performing the duties of his MOS. Evidence also shows he participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099980C070208

    Original file (2004099980C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the Military Awards Branch advised the Member of Congress by letter, dated 16 May 1997, that the Army Decorations Board, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, had determined the degree of heroism for award of the Silver Star did not merit approval of award of the Distinguished Service Cross or the Medal of Honor. [Soldier's name omitted] distinguished himself while serving as commanding officer, Company D, on a reconnaissance-in-force mission against enemy forces near...