Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018047
Original file (20080018047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018047 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank to major be adjusted to 
20 October 2005.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that if his commission had been reinstated  immediately upon his reentry into the active reserves in June of 2002, he would have been promoted to major on or before 20 October 2005 due to his eventual adjusted date of rank to captain of 21 October 1998.  As it was, it took from 
June 2002 until November 2006 before the Army Reserve completed the special board that recommended the return of his commission, which unfairly delayed his promotion to major.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the Chief of Department of the Army Promotions denying date of rank adjustment; a letter from the Chief of Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions Reserve Components regarding re-appointment to captain; two support memorandums; a Bronze Star Medal certificate; and an acceptance letter for enrollment into and a completion notification for Phase I of the Civil Affairs Officer Advanced Course.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
28 June 1971.  On 27 June 1973, he was released from active duty and transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard in 1974 and attained the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6 prior to being commissioned on 
25 July 1983.  He was transferred from the Michigan Army National Guard to the Individual Ready Reserve on 1 December 1988 in the rank of captain.  At some point the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  He was discharged from the Army Reserve on 3 January 2002.

3.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Army Reserve on 
14 June 2002 in the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6 and was later promoted to sergeant first class/pay grade E-7.  He accepted an appointment to warrant officer one on 23 June 2003 and later promoted to chief warrant officer two.

4.  On 31 January 2007, the Office of Promotions Reserve Components issued a letter showing the applicant was re-appointed to the rank of captain effective 
17 November 2006 with an adjusted date of rank to captain of 21 October 1998.  The letter also stated that his promotion eligibility date to major was established as 20 October 2005.  The letter further indicated that he should be identified to the 2008 Major, Army Promotion List, Department of the Army Reserve Component Selection Board.

5.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of major with both an effective date and date of rank of 30 May 2008.

6.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 4–21, states in pertinent part, that except as provided elsewhere in this regulation, the effective date of promotion may not precede the date of the promotion memorandum.  An officer is promoted after selection if all qualifications for promotion are met (chapter 2 and paragraph 4-11).  When an officer does not meet the qualifications for promotion (paragraph 4-11), the effective date of promotion will not be earlier than the later date all qualifications are met.  In no case, will the date of rank or effective date of promotion be earlier than the date the board is approved, or, if required, the date of Senate confirmation.  The date of rank is the date the officer actually or constructively was appointed or promoted to a specific grade.

7.  The Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), is a public law enacted by Congress on 5 October 1994 and implemented on 1 October 1996.  The ROPMA specifies that an officer's promotion cannot be effective prior to the approval of the promotion board by the President Of The United States or his designee.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant does not contest the loss of commission and he has not shown error, injustice, or inequity for the relief he requests.  While it is understandable that the applicant may feel that the reinstatement process should have been more expeditious, it was not.

2.  When his commission was reinstated, he was given a date of rank to captain of 21 October 1998.  As such, he would have been eligible for promotion to major on 20 October 2005.  However, since his reinstatement was not until 
17 November 2006, he was not eligible for promotion until 30 May 2008, the date the next major promotion board was approved.  As such, the applicant's date of rank of 30 May 2008 is appropriate since that is the date the President's designee approved the promotion board which selected him.

3.  It is noted that the applicant did not yet have a commissioned status on the date he is requesting to be used as his date of rank to major.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018047





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018047



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008840

    Original file (20080008840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to captain be adjusted from 29 October 2005 to 30 October 2002. During the processing of the applicant's case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB, Chief, Personnel Division who recommended that the applicant's promotion effective date and DOR be adjusted from 29 October 2005 to 30 October 2003; that he be promoted to major effective 30 October 2007; and that he receive all back pay and allowances as a result of his adjustment and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006638

    Original file (20080006638.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his date of rank (DOR) for captain from 10 April 1998 to 2 October 1997 and adjustment to his DOR for major from 2 June 2004 to the approval date of the 2003 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a second lieutenant and 4 years as a first lieutenant before promotion to captain. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017298

    Original file (AR20080017298.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion stated that the effective date of promotion for an Army National Guard commissioned officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal Recognition. NGR 600-100 states that the promotion of officers in the Army National Guard is a function of the State and that the effective date of promotion for an Army National Guard officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal Recognition,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091744C070212

    Original file (2003091744C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further states that she was also informed that she was past her eligibility date for promotion and that her records had not been reviewed by a promotion selection board. The ARPERSCOM stated that she was considered for promotion to O-4 by the 1997 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) and recommended for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074564C070403

    Original file (2002074564C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) and/or Special Selection Board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. The Board also notes that based on the correction to his DOR’s for captain and major and for the applicant to receive the earliest promotion consideration for lieutenant colonel, it would now be appropriate to submit his records for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019704

    Original file (20090019704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 November 2002, the Board advised the applicant that the records indicated he was a member of a TPU and his DOR and effective date for promotion to captain had been correctly established as 9 January 1999, the date he was assigned to a captain’s position. The Reserve Officer Personnel Act in effect prior to ROPMA required completion of 3 years as a second lieutenant and 4 years as a first lieutenant before promotion to captain. The evidence shows the applicant was appointed as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089630C070403

    Original file (2003089630C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was promoted to major with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 19 June 2002. The Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that the applicant was promoted to captain effective 23 May 1995 and promotion to major required 7 years time in grade. Notwithstanding the delay, the effective date of promotion shall remain as 19 June 2002, the date the President approved the board, and the applicant is not further entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060045C070421

    Original file (2001060045C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that the applicant was in the zone of consideration by the 1996 RCSB with a PED of 10 September 1996 (sic), based on the 12 years TCS requirement. The table states an officer will be promoted on the date he meets the TIG in grade and TCS requirements provided he is recommended for promotion by the selection board that considered him for promotion. If not selected for promotion by the SSB he should be issued a corrected promotion order with a DOR of 10 September 1996 (sic)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064715C070421

    Original file (2001064715C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, United States Code, section 14308(c)(2) states that “Except as specifically authorized by law, a reserve officer is not entitled to additional pay or allowances if the effective date of the officer’s promotion is adjusted to reflect a date earlier than the actual date of the officer’s promotion.” The 1997 board was approved on 27 August 1997. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was promoted to major...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00007

    Original file (BC-2005-00007.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Had he met the UV Board he would have been promoted to major effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 15 March 2002. c. His date of rank to captain was 21 September 1988 and not 24 June 1995 as noted in his military record. DPFOC state’s as they are unable to confirm that his promotion date should be changed from 1 October 2002 to 15 March 2002, they conclude the proper procedures were followed in his submission for mandatory (ROPMA) promotion. ...