Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017950
Original file (20080017950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        26 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017950 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device was not listed on his DD Form 214 and that he was never awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of the general orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 30 July 1965.  He completed training, including basic parachutist training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B1P as an airborne infantryman.  He qualified as a marksman with the service rifle, automatic rifle, and the M-60 machinegun.

3.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 2 February 1966 and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2d Battalion (Airborne), 502d Infantry Regiment, until 27 March 1966 when he was transferred to Company A.

4.  The applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 29 March 
1966.  U.S. Army Vietnam General Orders Number 3038, dated 21 May 1966, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device for heroic action as a machine gunner on a night patrol on 1 March 1966.

5.  The applicant was advanced to specialist four/pay grade E-4 on 8 August 
1966, returned to the United States on 20 January 1967, and was promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 on 26 July 1967.

6.  He was released from active duty on 29 July 1968 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) with an honorable characterization of service.  His DD Form 214 lists his authorized awards as the Parachutist Badge, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, National Defense Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

7.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), item 38 (Record of Assignments), shows that his conduct and efficiency ratings were exclusively "excellent."  There is no evidence of any court-martial conviction.

8.  The following information is relevant to the applicant's awards:

	a.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 
1955 are not disqualifying.

	b.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows the campaigns periods for Vietnam.  During the applicant’s tour in Vietnam he participated in two campaign periods.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

	c.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Credit Register) lists the unit awards for the Vietnam era.  It shows that the 2d Battalion, 502d Infantry, was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for action during the period 2 June 
1966 through 20 June 1966 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) 59, dated 1968; the Valorous Unit Award for the period from 17 January 
1966 through 25 March 1966 by DAGO 1, dated 1969; the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 29 July 1965 through 1 October 1966 by DAGO 1, dated October 1966; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the periods 1 through 31 July 1966 and 9 December 1966 through 18 January 1967 by DAGO 21, dated 1969.  Note:  Uniform regulations prohibit wearing more than one Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states that the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device was omitted from his DD Form 214 and that he was never awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  He was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device by general orders and it should be shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service with all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and it should be shown on his DD Form 214.

4.  He served in Vietnam during two designated campaign periods and is authorized to wear two bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal.

5.  The applicant's weapons qualifications should be shown on his DD Form 214 as the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Automatic Rifle Bar, and Machinegun Bar.

6.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time that unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Although he may wear only one Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, both (plus the other unit awards) should be added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X __  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 30 July 1965 through 29 July 1968; and

	b.  showing that, in addition to the awards already listed on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device; Army Good Conduct Medal; Presidential Unit Citation; Valorous Unit Award; Meritorious Unit Commendation; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award); Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Automatic Rifle, and Machinegun Bars; and two bronze service stars for wear on the already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017950



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017950



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009944

    Original file (20110009944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) he qualified: * Sharpshooter with the M-14 Rifle on 29 April 1966 * Expert with the M-60 Machinegun on 7 July 1966 * Sharpshooter with the M-16 Automatic Rifle on 1 July 1966 b. item 31 (Foreign Service) Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 13 September 1966 through 21 August 1968; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the: (1) 68th Assault Helicopter Company, from 27 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009483

    Original file (20100009483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214 and b. adding the following to item 24 of his DD Form 214: (1) the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106935C070208

    Original file (2004106935C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, during his service in Vietnam, Company B, 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 506th Infantry Regiment, 101st Air Cavalry Division was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004697

    Original file (20120004697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. DAGO Number 73 of 1968 and Army Pamphlet 672-3 both show that the applicant's unit, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment is authorized the Valorous Unit Award, but not the Presidential Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020495

    Original file (20140020495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records shows Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders (GO) Number 1650, dated 25 March 1968, and GO Number 7444, dated 7 November 1968, announced award of the AM to the applicant for meritorious achievement from 12 October 1967 to 29 February 1968. Therefore, it is concluded that he is entitled to correction of his records to show one award of the AM; b. GOs awarded the applicant the Soldier's Medal for heroism; c. the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008723

    Original file (20090008723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), Combat Infantryman Badge, Parachutist Badge, Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, Aircraft Crewman's Badge, and three overseas service bars. Concerning his service with the 173rd Airborne Brigade, that service is shown in the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007670

    Original file (20080007670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence shows that while the applicant served in Vietnam he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device; the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal; and the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073882C070403

    Original file (2002073882C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The five members of his squad who were evacuated received Purple Hearts. The applicant's service medical records do not show that he was treated for a shrapnel wound injury on 2 February 1966. It states that the Purple Heart is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who has been wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011988

    Original file (20140011988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device orders and certificate * Bronze Star Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) certificate and citation * letter authorizing acceptance of the Gallantry Cross Medal with Bronze Star awarded by the Republic of Vietnam with orders and translation * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Additionally, this item shows his conduct and efficiency ratings were “excellent.” e. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations): * National Defense...