Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017750
Original file (20080017750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  24 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017750 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of First Sergeant instead of Master Sergeant.

2.  The applicant states that he was not aware that he had the option of being placed on the Retired List as a First Sergeant until recently.

3.  The applicant provides excerpts from his military records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 




has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 9 May 1950, was promoted to pay grade E-7, and was discharged on 9 October 1961.

3.  The applicant had a break in service until his enlistment in the ARNG on 13 June 1975.  He served continuously and was placed in a First Sergeant position on 10 January 1984.  He was promoted to the rank of First Sergeant, pay grade E-8, on 12 July 1984.

4.  The applicant served as a First Sergeant until 11 March 1990.

5.  The applicant then served as a Master Sergeant until 31 July 1991.  

6.  The applicant was laterally appointed as a First Sergeant on 10 December 1991 and served in that capacity until 13 July 1992.

7.  The applicant then served as a Master Sergeant until his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 30 April 1993.

8.  The applicant was placed on the Retired List on 25 April 1993.

9.  Army Regulation 135-180, Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service, paragraph 2-2, in effect at the time, stated that a Master Sergeant E-8 who formerly held the title of First Sergeant and who wishes to be shown on the Retired List in his or her former title must include verification of service in that rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence conclusively shows that the applicant was laterally appointed to, as served as, a First Sergeant.

2.  It is reasonable to presume that the applicant was not aware that he could have requested placement on the Retired List in the rank of First Sergeant.

3.  As such, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records as recommended below.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of First Sergeant.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017750





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017750



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019211

    Original file (20130019211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. The applicant held the rank of MSG, not 1SG, on his last day of active duty. His DD Form 214 correctly reflects the rank and grade he held at the time of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011310

    Original file (20080011310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces. In view of the facts of this case, the applicant’s retirement orders should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the retired grade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006568C070208

    Original file (20040006568C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was advanced on the retired list to pay grade E-7. The applicant provides: a. The applicant held the rank of Staff Sergeant (E-6) at the time he was transferred from the ARNG to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013848

    Original file (20140013848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3964, provides that a retired enlisted member or warrant officer of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which he or she satisfactorily served on active duty (or, in the case of a member of the ARNG, which he or she served on full-time duty satisfactorily), as determined by the Secretary of the Army when his or her active service plus his or her service on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002295

    Original file (20140002295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 30 September 2003 to show his rank/grade as sergeant major (SGM)/E-9. The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows an incorrect rank and grade. He served on active duty while in the U.S. Army Reserve and/or ARNG from September 1983 to December 1990, December 1990 to May 1991, and May 1991 to May 1998.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013273

    Original file (20090013273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank title be changed to first sergeant on his retirement orders and on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, paragraph 12-17, states that NCOs holding the rank of master sergeant at retirement, whose records show successful service as first sergeant, will be placed on the retired list in the rank title of first sergeant. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001955

    Original file (20120001955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as "first sergeant (1SG)" vice "master sergeant (MSG)." The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the 5-week 1SG Course in August 1993 and he served in the rank and duty position of 1SG from December 1993 through May 1994.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026568

    Original file (20100026568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he/his: * LES shows he received casual pay in the amount of $19,488.03 in section 8 (Other Collections) and disability severance pay in section 39 (Remarks) * did receive separation pay, but didn’t receive any disability severance pay * LES is in error * wouldn’t have taken the pay if he thought it would have jeopardized his retirement * commander, executive officer, and separation orders state that he was due separation pay * retired rank should show SFC/E-7 as his highest grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005773

    Original file (20120005773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to support a change to the applicant's grade at the time of retirement or his advancement on the Retired List, there must be evidence that the applicant completed the satisfactory service requirement to complete 2 years of active duty service in the higher grade of MSG. Further, the evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant while showing he was twice promoted to 1SG/MSG and twice administratively reduced to SFC, not due to his own misconduct, while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011626

    Original file (20130011626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his retirement orders show his grade as SSG/E-6. Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending...