Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017464
Original file (20080017464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	       21 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017464 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Vietnam campaign medals and service medals be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states that he was discharged at Fort Lewis, Washington but he was not given any credit for Vietnam in-country service.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 1965 for a period of three years.  At the completion of basic combat and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 36C (Lineman).  His highest grade attained was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.  He served in Germany from 18 January 1966 to 20 June 1966.  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he arrived in Vietnam on 7 August 1966 and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment and Company C, 125th Signal Battalion, 25th Infantry Division.  

4.  His DA Form 20 shows he departed Vietnam on 22 July 1967.  He was credited with participation in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II and the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III campaigns.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on his DA Form 20 lists award of the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, one Overseas Service Bar, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 16 August 1968.  He completed 3 years of active military service with no days of lost time.  His DA Form 20 shows he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service.

7.  His DD Form 214 shows the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and one Overseas Service Bar as authorized awards.  

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 125th Signal Battalion, 25th Infantry Division, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation by Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders Number 17, dated 1968.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 125th Signal Battalion, 25th Infantry Division, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.  

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal correctly known as the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

14.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed a period of honorable service from 17 August 1965 through 16 August 1968.  Therefore, he has met the eligibility criteria for award of the National Defense Service Medal.

2.  The applicant served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  He also received credit for participation in two campaigns during the Vietnam War.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

3.  It appears the applicant has met the regulatory requirements for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 August 1965 through 16 August 1968.  The applicant’s service records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" and was promoted to SP4 during this period.  

4.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period it was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, these awards should be added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 August 1965 through 16 August 1968; and 

	b.  adding the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214.



      _________xxx_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017464





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017464



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014988

    Original file (20100014988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Based on item 41 of his DA Form 20, he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the National Defense Service Medal which are not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009919

    Original file (20090009919.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015505

    Original file (20060015505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of 3 DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), with effective dates of 9 October 1966, 14 August 1968, and 20 September 1973; Headquarters, 3rd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division (Vietnam), General Orders Number 90, dated 9 July 1967; Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division (Vietnam), General Orders Number 964, dated 3 March 1968; DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); and DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record). As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011238

    Original file (20130011238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089254C070403

    Original file (2003089254C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He attained the rank and pay grade of Specialist Four, E-4, was awarded two Bronze Star Medals for meritorious achievement, and there is no record of lost time in the applicant's service personnel records. a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 8 November 1968 through 13 June 1970;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016370C070206

    Original file (20050016370C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned as follows: a. by showing he is entitled to the National Defense Service Medal; b. by showing he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal; and c. by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019185

    Original file (20080019185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he received a shrapnel wound to his right temple near his eyebrow during his service in the Republic of Vietnam and should be entitled to award of the Purple Heart. There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. In the applicant’s case, there are no general orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows his wound was a result of hostile action;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020837

    Original file (20140020837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * military records * DD Form 214 * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 30 of this DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show his Vietnam service dates. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021357

    Original file (20140021357 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows – * promotion to sergeant (E-5) on 21 July 1967 * service in the military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) from 27 October 1965 to 15 February 1967 and 76Y (Unit and Organization Supply Specialist from 16 February 1967 through the end of his enlistment * service in Vietnam from 18 June 1966 through 22 August 1966 * assignment in Vietnam with Company A, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007473

    Original file (20090007473.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant participated in one campaign period during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 23a of his DD Form 214 the entry "71Q3O"...