Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017322
Original file (20080017322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        09 APRIL 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017322 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal. 

2.  The applicant states that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with a certificate and orders, but it is not listed in his DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket).

3.  The applicant provides a citation and certificate showing he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal and a continuation page of unknown orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal in support of this application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 May 1971.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Crewman), and was later awarded secondary MOS 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  He departed for a tour in the Panama Canal Zone on
20 October 1971, and served with Combat Support Company, 3rd Battalion,
5th Infantry.  He returned to the continental United States on or about 3 May 1973.  He was honorably released from active duty on 4 May 1973 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Good Conduct Medal.  It does not show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal; however, he provided a continuation page of unknown orders which awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for the period October 1971 to May 1973.  He also provided a certificate and citation for the Army Commendation Medal for the same period of service, of which a copy of the citation was present in his military records.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal. 

2.  While the applicant did not provide a complete copy of orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal, the undated orders, which contained proper authentication, appear to be authentic.  Additionally, he did provide a properly constituted certificate and citation awarding him the Army Commendation Medal, and a copy of the citation was also in his official military records.  As a result, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his military records to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal.
BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal.

2.  The Board wants to thank the applicant for the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during his military service.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his honorable service in arms.



      ________XXX________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017322



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017322



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017203

    Original file (20130017203.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded an Army Commendation Medal for his service in Vietnam, but the award is not listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 May 1968 through 21 May 1971 and b. adding the following awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000542

    Original file (20130000542.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) and Bronze Star Medal * Item 30 (Remarks) - the entry "GED" (General Education Development) 2. GO awarded the applicant two awards of the Army Commendation Medal during his period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013457

    Original file (20130013457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Overseas Service Bar, Air Medal, and Army Commendation Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004945

    Original file (20110004945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 October 1971 shows award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Army Commendation Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. The evidence of record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 26 June 1969 through 13 October 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001162C070206

    Original file (20050001162C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. The period of service covered by the award coincides with the applicant's dates of service at Fort Hood. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by confirming his award of the Army Commendation Medal; b. by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal; and c. by showing that he is entitled to the Korea Defense Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001162C070206

    Original file (20050001162C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 SEPTEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001162 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001755

    Original file (20130001755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. He provided and his record contains an award certificate which shows he was awarded the ARCOM during his period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017810

    Original file (20090017810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) to show all of medals he is entitled to receive to include the Bronze Star Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The Board also recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003616

    Original file (20080003616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019800

    Original file (20140019800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 May 1969 to 25 May 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars;...