Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017266
Original file (20080017266.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        03 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017266 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that he served as an Infantryman in Vietnam, but was never awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  He also states that he was never advised by his command of this badge, but that he met the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); and orders, dated 27 September 1972, which released him from active duty on 29 September 1972 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 December 1969.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He departed for the Republic of Vietnam on 26 June 1970, and served as a Rifleman in duty MOS 11B with Company B, 2nd Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment.  He departed Vietnam on or about 9 October 1970, and began a tour in Korea on 21 October 1970.  He returned to the continental United States on 13 July 1971, and served at Fort Carson, Colorado until he was honorably released from active duty on 29 September 1972.  The DD Form 214 that he was issued at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with One Bronze Service Star, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) do not show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  There are no orders in his military records which awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Battle or campaign participation credit alone is not sufficient; the unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  Although the applicant possessed and served in an infantry MOS with an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size during his tour in Vietnam, there is no evidence in his military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that his unit engaged in active ground combat or that he actively participated in ground combat.  In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Combat Infantryman Badge to the applicant in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _  XXX _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017266



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017266



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016366

    Original file (20080016366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military records do show that he served as a Grenadier in duty MOS 11B with Company C, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry Regiment from 16 September 1970 to 1 January 1971, and as a Rifleman in duty MOS 11B with this same unit from 27 January 1971 to on or about 17 May 1971, but there is no evidence in the applicant's military records which conclusively shows that he was personally present and engaged in active ground combat during this period of time. The applicant served in Vietnam from 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016888

    Original file (20080016888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military personnel records did not contain any orders for awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, the evidence of record fails to support the applicant’s claim to the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015628

    Original file (20080015628.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant served with signal units in a non-infantry MOS during his service in Vietnam and was clearly not awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, even though his DD Forms 214 reflect that he was. While the applicant requested that the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006965

    Original file (20140006965.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted on 23 January 1969, REFRAD on 18 October 1969, and he had served 3 months and 20 days in the RVN as of that time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge for satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015042

    Original file (20090015042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his records be corrected awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and showing he served in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following pertinent information: a. award of primary MOS 94B effective 24 January 1969; b. award of secondary MOS 11B effective 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017384

    Original file (20140017384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. It states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002908

    Original file (20110002908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no official orders or other evidence in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009693

    Original file (20080009693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of evidence, which shows the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004810

    Original file (20090004810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that his military records cannot be found and he needs proof he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in infantryman positions with D Company (Ranger), 151st Infantry and D Company (Ranger), 75th Infantry from October 1969 to January 1970, and C Company, 87th Infantry from 2 January 1971 to 27 April 1971. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021017

    Original file (20120021017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the applicant's service in Vietnam in an infantry MOS is not in question, there is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while his unit was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. _______ _...