Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016928
Original file (20080016928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       26 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016928 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank of Specialist Five (SP5) as permanent (P) instead of as temporary (T), and his date of return from United States Army Europe (USAREUR) as 2 May 1969 instead of 1968.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his 
DD Form 214 should read SP5 (P) and the entry in Item 30 (Remarks) concerning his dates of service in USAREUR should read "USAREUR 16 April 1968 - 2 May 1969."

3.  The applicant provides no documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 24 May 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for 3 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 61C (Marine Engineer).

3.  The applicant served a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 12 March 1967 to 4 March 1968 and a tour of duty in USAREUR from 16 April 1968 to 
2 May 1969.

4.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of SP5/pay grade E-5, effective
13 January 1968.  This appointment was temporary.

5.  On 3 May 1969, the applicant was released from active duty by reason of early separation from overseas and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) as a SP5/E-5.

6.  Item 5a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that his rank as SP5 (T).  Item 30 shows his service in USAREUR as from 16 April 1968 to 2 May 1968.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), in effect at the time, provided that temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade serving would automatically become permanent on the date of completion of the required time in grade and time in service.  For grade E-5 during the period from December 1968 to March 1969, the time in grade requirement was 12 months, and the time in service requirement was 5 years. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his rank as shown on his DD Form 214 should be permanent and that his date of service in USAREUR should end in 1969.

2.  The governing regulation at the time of the applicant's active duty service required a year in grade and 5 years in service to qualify for permanent appointment to grade E-5.  While the applicant met the time in grade requirement, he did not meet the time in service requirement; he only had
2 years, 11 months, and 10 days of active duty service.  Therefore, his request to correct the status of his rank on his DD Form 214 should be denied.

3.  Records clearly show that the applicant served in USAREUR from 16 April 1968 to 2 May 1969.  Therefore, Item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the correct ending year of his overseas service.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X__  ___X__ _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.   deleting from Item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "USAREUR 16 APR 68 - 2 MAY 1968"; and

	b.  adding in Item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "USAREUR 16 APR 1968 - 2 MAY 1969."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing that he was permanently appointed to the grade of E-5.



      ________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016928



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016928



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028198

    Original file (20100028198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to: * award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011138

    Original file (20100011138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Evidence shows his last permanent appointment was to PFC/E-3, which is appropriately entered in item 30 of his DD Form 214. However, the permanent pay grade and date of appointment, if different from items 5a and 5b, will be entered in item 30, as correctly reflected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002778

    Original file (20120002778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Korea and that he was separated in grade E-5. However, his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Korea or that he was separated in the grade of E-5. Records show the applicant served in Korea for 1 year and 1 month, from 7 April 1967 through 6 May 1968, and that this service is recorded in item 22, block c of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001545

    Original file (20080001545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows that, prior to his discharge from active duty, the applicant was appointed/promoted to the temporary rank/grade of SP5/E-5, effective 16 July 1969. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, which fell under the USARPAC Theater of Operations, for a period of 7 months and 18 days, which is correctly shown on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022867

    Original file (20100022867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022867 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the temporary rank/pay grade of SP5/E-5 under the authority of SO Number 234, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division. His record shows he was permanently appointed in rank/pay grade SP5/E-5 on 22 October 1969, which is the day after he was released from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006052

    Original file (20090006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was appointed to the rank of command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9 and that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of CSM (E-9). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) the entry "SGM E-9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) the entry "29 SEP 67"; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served overseas in USAREUR in Germany from 10 September 1966 through 17 September 1969; d. item 33...