Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016742
Original file (20080016742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  27 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016742 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) be added to his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his military personnel and medical records will confirm his entitlement to the CMB.

3.  The applicant provides Special Orders Number 230 which shows the applicant was retired for physical unfitness and rated 90 percent disabled, his DD Form 214, and excerpts from his physical evaluation board (PEB).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 January 1966 and was awarded the military occupational specialty of medical specialist.

3.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 26 July 1967 and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry as a medical specialist on 31 July 1967.

4.  On 30 September 1967, the applicant's parents were sent a Western Union telefax which informed them that the applicant was slightly wounded in Vietnam on 29 September 1967 as a result of hostile action.  In the telefax it was explained that the applicant sustained a gunshot wound to both buttocks, both legs, and right foot, with traumatic amputation of his index and middle finger of his right hand.  In the telefax it was stated that the applicant was on a combat mission when hit by hostile automatic weapons fire.

5.  On 13 December 1967, the applicant departed Vietnam and was reassigned to a medical holding company in the continental United States.

6.  On 11 December 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-5 and placed on the Retired List for physical unfitness, permanent, rated 90 percent disabled.

7.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service.

8.  Based on the applicant's dates of service in Vietnam, Table B-1 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows he served in the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III Campaign (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968).

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Medical Badge was awarded to a member of the Army Medical Service (colonels and below) who had satisfactorily performed medical duties subsequent to 6 December 1941 while assigned or attached to a medical unit of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or as a member of the medical platoon of an infantry or airborne brigade headquarters company, during any period the infantry unit was engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit was not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy.
10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in pertinent part, that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  After 27 June 1950 to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as 1 year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation.  The regulations state that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign and service medal, which in this case is the Vietnam Service Medal.

12.  Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, as amended, provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was a medical specialist (combat medic) assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam.  The fact that the applicant was wounded when he was hit by hostile automatic weapons fire while he was on a combat mission shows he was engaged in active ground combat.  As such, he is entitled to the CMB.

2.  Since there is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service, it is evident that he was also entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It would be appropriate to now add that award.

3.  Based on the dates of the applicant's service in the Army and in Vietnam, he is also entitled to have the following awards added to his DD Form 214:  the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and a bronze service star to be worn on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the CMB;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 January 1966 to 11 December 1968; and

	c.  amending his DD Form 214 to add this badge and this award along with the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and a bronze service star to be worn on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016742



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028632

    Original file (20100028632.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 March 1974 to show the Combat Medical Badge (CMB), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and any other unit awards to which he may be entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 1974 the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004884

    Original file (20080004884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with the period ending 21 November 1967 to show award of two Purple Hearts [correctly known as the Purple Heart First Oak Leaf Cluster] and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000346C070206

    Original file (20050000346C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 February 1968 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008105

    Original file (20130008105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 December 1966 to 5 December 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010741

    Original file (20110010741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the U.S. on 27 November 1968. Although ADCARS does not contain the orders showing he was awarded the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Casualty Listing shows him as being wounded in action on 18 May 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exemplary service from 24 January 1967 through 30 November 1968 and amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013484

    Original file (20080013484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 7432, showing awards of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device dated 25 August 1968 and General Orders Number 8597, showing award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, dated 17 September 1968 in support of his request. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004406C070206

    Original file (20050004406C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004406 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011274

    Original file (20140011274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states: * he was not awarded the CMB or AGCM * he was not awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross, but he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for deeds of valor and heroism in Vietnam * he served as a combat medic in Vietnam but was not awarded the CMB 3. His records are void of documentation showing he was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross as an individual award or that he received authorization to accept and wear this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004828C070206

    Original file (20050004828C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows the applicant was awarded of the Purple Heart (1st and 2nd Award) for wounds sustained during hostile action on 7 January 1968 and 3 February 1968 in Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart (3rd Award). However, the Vietnam Casualty Roster, his DA Form 20, and a Western Union telefax show he was wounded in combat by hostile forces on 22 April 1968 and treated for his wounds.